1 |
♠JT3
♥AJ
♦A98
♣J9654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Zinman-Karter
400 3.00 1.00 3N N 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 1-Stone-Winham
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Chase-Smith
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ S -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
|
2 |
♠K5
♥K76
♦AT752
♣542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 5♠ 1/5NT ♦5 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♠ E -2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Chase-Smith
50 2.50 1.50 6♠ E -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 2.50 1.50 5♠ W -1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 1-Stone-Winham
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 2-Shipman-Keen vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
|
3 |
♠JT74
♥T53
♦Q2
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 4♥* S -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Chase-Smith
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ E +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 1-Stone-Winham
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ E +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
4 |
♠J762
♥AJ5
♦952
♣K72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Chase-Smith
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 1-Stone-Winham
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
|
5 |
♠73
♥9654
♦T9764
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 1-Stone-Winham
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
420 1.50 2.50 5♣ E +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
420 1.50 2.50 5♣ E +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Zinman-Karter
920 0.00 4.00 6♣ W 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Chase-Smith
|
6 |
♠5
♥KJ62
♦J94
♣AT942
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 2N E -3 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Stone-Winham
100 1.50 2.50 1♠ E -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 2-Chase-Smith
|
7 |
♠J96
♥97
♦863
♣QJ853
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4/5♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Stone-Winham
200 3.00 1.00 6♥ E -2 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 2.00 5♥ E -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 2-Chase-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 5♠ S -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
650 0.00 4.00 5♥ E 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|
8 |
♠65
♥AQ94
♦QJ53
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N S 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
140 2.50 1.50 1♥ S +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 2-Chase-Smith
70 1.00 3.00 1♣ W 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Stone-Winham
90 0.00 4.00 1♣ W +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
9 |
♠QJ8763
♥K5
♦AJ
♣J95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Zinman-Karter
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 2-Shipman-Keen vs 2-Chase-Smith
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Stone-Winham
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ E +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|
10 |
♠K72
♥AT985
♦-
♣AKT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1/2♠ ♣5/6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
730 4.00 0.00 3♥* S 2-Shipman-Keen vs 2-Chase-Smith
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Stone-Winham
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
300 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|
11 |
♠T875
♥AQ986
♦853
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Chase-Smith
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 4-Zinman-Karter
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 1-Stone-Winham
50 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|
12 |
♠JT
♥AK7654
♦T
♣JT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ W +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 1-Stone-Winham
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 4-Zinman-Karter
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Chase-Smith
|
13 |
♠K987
♥Q9763
♦7
♣A52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♥4/5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 1-Stone-Winham
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Chase-Smith
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
14 |
♠KQJT76
♥4
♦K
♣J9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1520 4.00 0.00 7N S 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
980 3.00 1.00 6♠ N 2-Shipman-Keen vs 1-Stone-Winham
920 2.00 2.00 6♣ S 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Chase-Smith
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
420 0.00 4.00 5♣ S +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
15 |
♠T97
♥KJ6
♦A83
♣AQ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2/1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +3 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Chase-Smith
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ N +2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 1-Stone-Winham
|
16 |
♠J97
♥54
♦AQ943
♣T85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ N -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Stone-Winham
100 3.00 1.00 3♥* S -1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Chase-Smith
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
17 |
♠AQ632
♥76532
♦7
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ S 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Chase-Smith
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Stone-Winham
400 0.00 4.00 3N S 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠A875
♥QJ2
♦J
♣QT643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 5♦ ♣4/3 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Stone-Winham
100 2.50 1.50 5♥ S -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Chase-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
400 0.00 4.00 5♦ E 2-Shipman-Keen vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|
19 |
♠74
♥54
♦Q7
♣KT96543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
50 2.50 1.50 4♣ N -1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Stone-Winham
50 2.50 1.50 3♣ S -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ S -2 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Chase-Smith
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
20 |
♠J4
♥T8653
♦J832
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Chase-Smith
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Stone-Winham
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
|
21 |
♠J63
♥982
♦K32
♣JT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥0 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 4/5♣ 4♦ 7♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 4.00 0.00 2♠ W +4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
430 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Stone-Winham
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 2-Chase-Smith
|
22 |
♠T975
♥83
♦Q9832
♣Q5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 2-Chase-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Stone-Winham
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 2-Shipman-Keen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
23 |
♠K63
♥J976
♦A94
♣AT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ W +1 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Stone-Winham
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 2-Chase-Smith
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 2-Shipman-Keen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
24 |
♠96
♥A974
♦Q82
♣J984
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2/1♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ W 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Stone-Winham
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 2-Chase-Smith
|
25 |
♠2
♥A85
♦A97653
♣T74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 1-Schamberg-Williams vs 2-Chase-Smith
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 2-Shipman-Keen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Turnquist-Nelson
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 3-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Stone-Winham
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Andrews-Andrews
|