1 |
♠4
♥A5
♦AQJ83
♣KT542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2NT ♥5/4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 5♣ N ♠K 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Harken-Harken
170 2.63 1.38 4♦ N +2 ♠5 6-Martin-Benich vs 5-Kremers-Downing
120 1.38 2.63 1N S +1 ♠7 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 2-Burke-Reuben
140 0.13 3.88 3♥ E ♦2 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
2 |
♠AQ9765
♥AKQ5
♦5
♣Q9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4/5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ N +1 ♣7 6-Martin-Benich vs 5-Kremers-Downing
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ N +1 ♣7 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 2-Burke-Reuben
100 1.38 2.63 5♦* E -1 ♣A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Harken-Harken
130 0.13 3.88 3♦ E +1 ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
3 |
♠862
♥874
♦AKT7
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦A 6-Martin-Benich vs 5-Kremers-Downing
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♠8 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Keen
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦A 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 2-Burke-Reuben
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Harken-Harken
|
4 |
♠A7
♥AKJT43
♦K72
♣A6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 6/4♥ 4/3♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +1 ♣9 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Martin-Benich
620 2.63 1.38 4♥ N ♥2 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
200 1.38 2.63 3♥ N +2 ♦4 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Burke-Reuben
170 0.13 3.88 3♥ N +1 ♣9 1-Haley-Cole vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
5 |
♠82
♥AJ854
♦832
♣J86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ W +2 ♦2 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Burke-Reuben
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ W +2 ♦2 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
450 0.75 3.25 4♠ W +1 ♦8 1-Haley-Cole vs 3-Johnson-Keen
450 0.75 3.25 4♠ W +1 ♦8 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Martin-Benich
|
6 |
♠532
♥732
♦K432
♣J84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ E ♣A 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Burke-Reuben
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ E ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Martin-Benich
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ E ♣A 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♣A 1-Haley-Cole vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
7 |
♠Q854
♥J832
♦Q2
♣J32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 7♥ 1♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ E +1 ♠2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Haley-Cole
680 2.63 1.38 4♥ E +2 ♠3 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 5-Kremers-Downing
710 0.75 3.25 4♥ E +3 ♠2 2-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Zinman-Karter
710 0.75 3.25 4♥ E +3 ♣K 6-Martin-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
8 |
♠K3
♥JT
♦T8543
♣QT62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♥ E -2 ♦7 6-Martin-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Keen
50 2.63 1.38 4♥ E -1 ♦7 2-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Zinman-Karter
420 0.75 3.25 4♠ W ♦7 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Haley-Cole
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ W ♠K 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 5-Kremers-Downing
|
9 |
♠AK
♥Q975
♦J3
♣Q9764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 2N N -1 ♠4 6-Martin-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Keen
100 2.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♦T 2-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♦T 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Haley-Cole
150 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -3 ♥3 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 5-Kremers-Downing
|
10 |
♠KJT762
♥JT
♦65
♣764
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3/2NT ♣5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♦ W -1 ♣7 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 2.63 1.38 3♦ W +1 ♣6 1-Haley-Cole vs 6-Martin-Benich
630 0.75 3.25 3N E +1 ♠4 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 8-Harken-Harken
630 0.75 3.25 3N E +1 ♣T 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Reuben
|
11 |
♠T7
♥J9632
♦T32
♣Q42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N W ♣2 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 8-Harken-Harken
450 2.63 1.38 4♠ W +1 ♥9 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Reuben
480 0.75 3.25 5♠ W +1 ♣2 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
480 0.75 3.25 4♠ W +2 ♣2 1-Haley-Cole vs 6-Martin-Benich
|
12 |
♠A
♥A73
♦86542
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 1N W -2 ♦8 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 3.25 0.75 2♥ E -2 ♠8 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 8-Harken-Harken
50 1.38 2.63 2♥ E -1 ♠4 1-Haley-Cole vs 6-Martin-Benich
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ E ♠8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Reuben
|
13 |
♠Q73
♥T9
♦A8752
♣873
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♦K 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Martin-Benich
180 3.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♠2 2-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♠4 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Kremers-Downing
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♥3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♣2 1-Haley-Cole vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
|
14 |
♠T
♥J965
♦KQT8
♣QT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +2 ♥2 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Kremers-Downing
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♦5 1-Haley-Cole vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Martin-Benich
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣2 2-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
15 |
♠-
♥KJ93
♦K8752
♣JT93
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦Q 1-Haley-Cole vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣J 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Kremers-Downing
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ E ♦Q 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Martin-Benich
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♦5 2-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
16 |
♠Q92
♥J3
♦542
♣KT985
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +2 ♦A 2-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Haley-Cole
200 3.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♦3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Zinman-Karter
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♦K 3-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S ♦K 5-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♣A 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 6-Martin-Benich
|
17 |
♠A82
♥J83
♦Q732
♣T73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2/3♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N N ♥4 2-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Haley-Cole
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W ♣T 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 6-Martin-Benich
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣A 3-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Zinman-Karter
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦2 5-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
18 |
♠KT
♥Q83
♦K7632
♣K42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1/-♠ ♣6/4 ♦5 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6/5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♣Q 5-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♣5 9-Claussen-Dawson vs 6-Martin-Benich
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣Q 2-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Haley-Cole
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣Q 3-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Harken-Harken
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣Q 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠964
♥QJT54
♦43
♣954
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♦ ♥6 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 3-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Burke-Reuben
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣8 6-Martin-Benich vs 8-Harken-Harken
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Kremers-Downing
110 1.00 3.00 1♠ S +1 ♣8 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Haley-Cole vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
20 |
♠J83
♥K964
♦852
♣T53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥4 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Kremers-Downing
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠3 6-Martin-Benich vs 8-Harken-Harken
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♥4 1-Haley-Cole vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♥4 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♣T 3-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Burke-Reuben
|
21 |
♠T7
♥JT42
♦2
♣AT9854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Kremers-Downing
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 3-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Burke-Reuben
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♠2 6-Martin-Benich vs 8-Harken-Harken
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣7 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
500 0.00 4.00 4♦* S -2 ♠2 1-Haley-Cole vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
22 |
♠7
♥K542
♦KT
♣AQT952
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠6 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
400 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠4 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Johnson-Keen
400 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠3 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Haley-Cole
150 0.50 3.50 4♣ N +1 ♠3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Benich
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ N +2 ♠J 2-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
|
23 |
♠QT4
♥T8732
♦KT
♣AT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Johnson-Keen
130 2.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 ♣6 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
130 2.50 1.50 2♣ E +2 ♣4 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Haley-Cole
180 1.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♥3 2-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Benich
|
24 |
♠AK9865
♥J852
♦QT3
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠4 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Haley-Cole
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♥A 2-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♥A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Johnson-Keen
50 1.00 3.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Benich
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♣Q 7-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
|
25 |
♠KJ7543
♥A6
♦65
♣A62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♦ ♦6/7 ♥4 ♠1/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +1 ♥J 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
230 2.63 1.38 3♠ N +3 ♥J 3-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
100 0.75 3.25 5♣ W -1 ♠5 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 0.75 3.25 4♣ W -1 ♥A 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
|
26 |
♠AKJ94
♥Q
♦853
♣AK87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N ♣9 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Zinman-Karter
140 3.25 0.75 1♠ N +2 ♣3 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
100 1.38 2.63 3♥ W -1 ♠A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♦7 3-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
|
27 |
♠K872
♥QT43
♦963
♣T2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N W +1 ♥3 3-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Claussen-Dawson
240 2.63 1.38 2N W +4 ♠2 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Haley-Cole
400 0.75 3.25 3N W ♠2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Wasserstrom-Smith
400 0.75 3.25 3N W ♥3 5-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|