1 |
♠A3
♥9875
♦T76542
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣2 ♥6 ♠3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣7 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 5.00 1.00 4♦ S -1 ♥A 4-Ording-Ording vs 7-Roy-Winner
170 3.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♦T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 3.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 ♦A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Burke-Burk
200 2.00 4.00 3♠ E +2 ♦A 1-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
420 1.00 5.00 4♠ E ♣7 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
450 0.00 6.00 4♠ E +1 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
|
2 |
♠J5
♥A98
♦T732
♣QJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 3♦ S ♥6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 5.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
100 4.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♥6 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦T 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
200 1.50 4.50 4♦ S -2 ♠K 4-Ording-Ording vs 7-Roy-Winner
200 1.50 4.50 3♦ S -2 ♥6 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Burke-Burk
300 0.00 6.00 5♦ S -3 ♥6 1-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
3 |
♠843
♥7
♦AT764
♣K654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
130 4.50 1.50 2♣ S +2 ♥A 4-Ording-Ording vs 7-Roy-Winner
130 4.50 1.50 2♣ S +2 ♥A 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
80 3.00 3.00 1♠ S ♣T 1-Bell-Ford vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 2.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♦J 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ W ♣4 6-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Burke-Burk
140 0.00 6.00 3♥ W ♣4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
4 |
♠AQT63
♥AK3
♦Q
♣KJ64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Burke-Burk
680 5.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
680 5.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
650 2.50 3.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
650 2.50 3.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
620 1.00 5.00 4♠ N ♦A 1-Bell-Ford vs 7-Roy-Winner
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 ♦A 4-Ording-Ording vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
5 |
♠9632
♥-
♦AQJ7642
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 4♣* W -2 ♦A 4-Ording-Ording vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 5.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 ♣7 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♣A 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♣A 1-Bell-Ford vs 7-Roy-Winner
200 2.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
400 1.00 5.00 3♥ S -4 ♠K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Burke-Burk
800 0.00 6.00 4♦* N -3 ♣6 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
|
6 |
♠AK83
♥93
♦KQJ9
♣AT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.50 0.50 2♥ N ♠2 1-Bell-Ford vs 7-Roy-Winner
110 5.50 0.50 2♥ N ♠2 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 4.00 2.00 3♣ W -1 ♦K 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
50 2.50 3.50 2♥ N -1 ♠2 6-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
50 2.50 3.50 1♦ N -1 ♠2 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Burke-Burk
100 0.50 5.50 2N N -2 ♣K 4-Ording-Ording vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
100 0.50 5.50 2♥ N -2 ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
7 |
♠K2
♥T8
♦A982
♣KJT87
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♠ W ♥T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Roy-Winner
170 4.50 1.50 3♠ W +1 ♥T 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 4-Burke-Burk
170 4.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♦9 1-Bell-Ford vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
200 2.50 3.50 3♠ W +2 ♥T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
200 2.50 3.50 2♣ N -2 ♠A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
300 1.00 5.00 2♣ N -3 ♠A 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 1-Payne-Perkins
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♦A 4-Ording-Ording vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
8 |
♠KT95
♥T72
♦T9
♣8652
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠4 4-Ording-Ording vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 4.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Roy-Winner
50 4.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♥3 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥T 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ E ♠7 1-Bell-Ford vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ W ♦T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
400 0.00 6.00 3N E ♠7 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 4-Burke-Burk
|
9 |
♠KJT
♥Q976
♦KJ
♣KJT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2/1 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2♠ S -2 ♥A 1-Bell-Ford vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
130 5.00 1.00 4♦ E ♠2 4-Ording-Ording vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 3.50 2.50 5♦ E ♠7 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 4-Burke-Burk
600 3.50 2.50 5♦ E ♠5 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 1-Payne-Perkins
660 1.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♣8 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
660 1.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♣8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Roy-Winner
660 1.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♣8 6-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
|
10 |
♠J87
♥K98
♦T6
♣AKT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥5 4-Ording-Ording vs 4-Burke-Burk
120 5.00 1.00 2N N ♣2 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 3.50 2.50 3♣ N ♠Q 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
110 3.50 2.50 3♣ N ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
100 2.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♣3 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 7-Roy-Winner
140 0.50 5.50 2♥ W +1 ♣A 1-Bell-Ford vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
140 0.50 5.50 2♥ W +1 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
11 |
♠QT62
♥AK92
♦K9864
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 6♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 5/4♣ 3♦ ♥1/2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1200 6.00 0.00 5♠** S +1 ♣Q 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
790 5.00 1.00 4♠* S +2 ♣Q 4-Ording-Ording vs 4-Burke-Burk
750 4.00 2.00 5♠* S +1 ♣Q 1-Bell-Ford vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
480 3.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♣Q 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 7-Roy-Winner
420 2.00 4.00 4♠ S ♣Q 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 1.00 5.00 5♠ S -1 ♣Q 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
400 0.00 6.00 5♣ E ♠7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
|
12 |
♠K
♥K3
♦KT43
♣AKT652
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ W ♣A 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 7-Roy-Winner
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ W ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ W ♣A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ W ♣A 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
170 1.00 5.00 3♠ W +1 ♣A 4-Ording-Ording vs 4-Burke-Burk
450 0.00 6.00 4♠ W +1 ♣A 1-Bell-Ford vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
|
13 |
♠KQT873
♥QJ6
♦2
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♥ 1♠ ♦4/3 ♥7/6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♠2 4-Ording-Ording vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
200 5.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♠2 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
100 4.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.50 3.50 3♦ E ♠2 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
110 2.50 3.50 3♦ E ♠2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 1.00 5.00 3♠ N -2 ♥T 6-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Roy-Winner
400 0.00 6.00 3N S -4 ♦3 1-Bell-Ford vs 4-Burke-Burk
|
14 |
♠T5
♥JT5
♦KJ
♣Q97653
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.50 0.50 3♥ S ♠J 1-Bell-Ford vs 4-Burke-Burk
140 5.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣2 4-Ording-Ording vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
100 4.00 2.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 3.00 3.00 4♠ E -1 ♥A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Roy-Winner
50 2.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♠J 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
100 1.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 ♣2 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
150 0.00 6.00 5♥ S -3 ♠3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
15 |
♠T975
♥AK32
♦AK65
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 6.00 0.00 5♦ N ♥7 6-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Roy-Winner
200 4.50 1.50 3♠ S +2 ♥6 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +3 ♥J 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
150 3.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 ♠A 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
130 1.50 4.50 4♦ N ♥7 4-Ording-Ording vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ S +1 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 ♥6 1-Bell-Ford vs 4-Burke-Burk
|
16 |
♠AQ8
♥KJT653
♦K63
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/-♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♠7/6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1/2NT ♥5 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 2♥ N +3 ♠K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Burke-Burk
200 5.50 0.50 4♣ E -2 ♥2 4-Ording-Ording vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
170 4.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♣7 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 2.50 3.50 3♦ E -1 ♥8 1-Bell-Ford vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
100 2.50 3.50 3♣ E -1 ♥7 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
80 1.00 5.00 1♥ N ♣7 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
50 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -1 ♣T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Roy-Winner
|
17 |
♠KQ95
♥T76
♦K9
♣K654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 ♠K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Burke-Burk
110 5.00 1.00 2♥ W ♦K 4-Ording-Ording vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♠K 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♠K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Roy-Winner
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♠K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♠5 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♦K 1-Bell-Ford vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
|
18 |
♠A2
♥873
♦T743
♣Q643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠7 6-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
100 5.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦8 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 7-Roy-Winner
150 3.50 2.50 2N E +1 ♠8 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 3.50 2.50 1N E +2 ♠6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Burke-Burk
180 2.00 4.00 1N E +3 ♠T 4-Ording-Ording vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
200 1.00 5.00 2♠ S -2 ♦8 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
300 0.00 6.00 3♠ S -3 ♦A 1-Bell-Ford vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
|
19 |
♠AT7532
♥T6432
♦A
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥A 1-Bell-Ford vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
420 5.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦J 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
170 4.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♦J 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 7-Roy-Winner
150 3.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♦6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♦J 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 4-Burke-Burk
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♦J 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
50 1.00 5.00 3♣ S -1 ♥Q 4-Ording-Ording vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
20 |
♠T3
♥97
♦A9763
♣AJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
100 4.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♥3 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 7-Roy-Winner
100 4.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥9 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 4-Burke-Burk
100 4.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥9 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ N ♣K 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
100 1.00 5.00 1N N -1 ♦2 1-Bell-Ford vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
300 0.00 6.00 2♠ S -3 ♦8 4-Ording-Ording vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
21 |
♠-
♥64
♦AKQT865
♣KT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: -/1♥ 3♠ ♣0 ♦0 ♥6/7 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 5♦ N +1 ♥A 6-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilkinson-Gunter
600 5.00 1.00 5♦ N ♥A 1-Bell-Ford vs 2-Steiger-Lasser
190 4.00 2.00 3♦ N +4 ♠K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Cowen-Wesolowski
170 3.00 3.00 3♦ N +3 ♠K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dioszegi-Sydes
150 2.00 4.00 4♦ N +1 ♠K 2-Osborn-Nelson vs 4-Burke-Burk
140 0.50 5.50 3♠ E ♦J 7-Lohnberg-Raphael vs 7-Roy-Winner
140 0.50 5.50 3♠ E ♦2 4-Ording-Ording vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|