1 |
♠T54
♥KQ4
♦A953
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.00 0.00 3N* W -3 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Dean-Williams
90 5.00 1.00 1N N ♦T 1-Osborn-Burke vs 1-Ording-Ording
50 3.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♠8 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
50 3.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Kerner-Smith
50 3.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦7 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 5.00 2♥ S -2 ♦7 7-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
150 0.00 6.00 2♥ S -3 ♦7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠AJ74
♥KT83
♦Q97
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♣Q 1-Osborn-Burke vs 1-Ording-Ording
50 5.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♣6 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
100 3.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♥6 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Payne-Perkins
100 3.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Dean-Williams
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ W ♥3 7-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
120 0.50 5.50 2N W ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
120 0.50 5.50 2N E ♦A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Kerner-Smith
|
3 |
♠-
♥K98
♦QJ875
♣JT652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦6 ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦Q 1-Osborn-Burke vs 1-Ording-Ording
200 4.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♦7 7-Benson-Lasser vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
200 4.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Dean-Williams
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 4-Kerner-Smith
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣A 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Payne-Perkins
710 0.00 6.00 4♠ W +3 ♥K 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
|
4 |
♠874
♥J92
♦64
♣KQ632
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♣3 1-Osborn-Burke vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♣4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Payne-Perkins
100 5.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Dean-Williams
150 2.00 4.00 3♦ W +2 ♣3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Ording-Ording
600 1.00 5.00 3N E ♣4 7-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Kerner-Smith
660 0.00 6.00 3N E +2 ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
5 |
♠T82
♥J543
♦KQ74
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♦4 7-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Kerner-Smith
50 4.50 1.50 1N W -1 ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Tainty-Harken
50 4.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♥T 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Dean-Williams
PASS 3.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Payne-Perkins
80 2.00 4.00 1♥ W ♠2 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Ording-Ording
110 1.00 5.00 1♠ E +1 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
140 0.00 6.00 1♠ E +2 ♣6 1-Osborn-Burke vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠AKQ6
♥K5
♦KJ753
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1520 6.00 0.00 7N N ♠T 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Dean-Williams
980 4.50 1.50 6♥ S ♠8 1-Osborn-Burke vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
980 4.50 1.50 6♥ S ♣T 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Ording-Ording
490 3.00 3.00 3N N +3 ♠J 7-Benson-Lasser vs 4-Kerner-Smith
480 2.00 4.00 4♥ S +2 ♦8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ N +1 ♥J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 7-Payne-Perkins
450 0.50 5.50 4♥ S +1 ♣8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
7 |
♠J985
♥2
♦KQ9432
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦T 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
230 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +4 ♦7 1-Osborn-Burke vs 7-Payne-Perkins
200 3.50 2.50 3♥ W -2 ♠5 7-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Tainty-Harken
200 3.50 2.50 3♥ W -2 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ording-Ording
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 ♣2 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ E ♦J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dean-Williams
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 ♦T 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠AK985
♥93
♦82
♣AKQJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣4 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
430 5.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥6 1-Osborn-Burke vs 7-Payne-Perkins
400 2.50 3.50 3N S ♦9 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dean-Williams
400 2.50 3.50 3N N ♥J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ording-Ording
400 2.50 3.50 3N N ♥4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
400 2.50 3.50 3N N ♥4 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 6.00 3♠ N +1 ♥4 7-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
9 |
♠8432
♥-
♦AQJ6
♣AT976
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 ♠Q 8-Harken-Winham vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
200 5.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Dean-Williams
650 2.00 4.00 5♥ W ♣A 7-Benson-Lasser vs 2-Tainty-Harken
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ording-Ording
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦7 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣5 1-Osborn-Burke vs 7-Payne-Perkins
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣5 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
|
10 |
♠K5432
♥T763
♦KJ
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ W ♣A 1-Osborn-Burke vs 6-Dean-Williams
130 4.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 ♠3 7-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Ording-Ording
130 4.50 1.50 2♣ W +2 ♥3 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
150 2.50 3.50 1N W +2 ♥3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 7-Payne-Perkins
150 2.50 3.50 1N E +2 ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Kerner-Smith
170 1.00 5.00 3♣ W +3 ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Tainty-Harken
210 0.00 6.00 2N E +3 ♠Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠AJ62
♥62
♦K2
♣QJT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.50 0.50 2♣* E -3 ♠T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
500 5.50 0.50 2♣* E -3 ♠3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 7-Payne-Perkins
400 4.00 2.00 3N S ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Kerner-Smith
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣A 7-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Ording-Ording
100 2.00 4.00 2♣ E -2 ♠8 1-Osborn-Burke vs 6-Dean-Williams
50 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♣3 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
12 |
♠64
♥65
♦AT9832
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 4.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♣T 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 2-Tainty-Harken
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♠A 7-Benson-Lasser vs 1-Ording-Ording
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♥3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 7-Payne-Perkins
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♣3 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
200 0.50 5.50 3N N -2 ♣3 1-Osborn-Burke vs 6-Dean-Williams
200 0.50 5.50 3♦ N -2 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Kerner-Smith
|
13 |
♠KQ7
♥9765
♦54
♣JT43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 4/3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 6N W -2 ♦Q 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tainty-Harken
200 5.50 0.50 6♥ E -2 ♦Q 1-Osborn-Burke vs 4-Kerner-Smith
100 4.00 2.00 7♥ E -1 ♦Q 7-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ording-Ording
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Payne-Perkins
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
690 0.00 6.00 3N E +3 ♦7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
|
14 |
♠9
♥KT985
♦873
♣J962
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦K 7-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
50 4.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♥8 1-Osborn-Burke vs 4-Kerner-Smith
50 4.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♠2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
50 4.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 1.50 4.50 2♠ E ♦K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Payne-Perkins
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ E ♦K 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ording-Ording
180 0.00 6.00 1N W +3 ♠9 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
15 |
♠7
♥72
♦T97642
♣AK87
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 2♠* W -2 ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 1-Ording-Ording
150 4.50 1.50 4♦ S +1 ♥9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
150 4.50 1.50 2♦ N +3 ♥J 7-Benson-Lasser vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.00 3.00 2♦ S +2 ♥4 1-Osborn-Burke vs 4-Kerner-Smith
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ S ♣Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
100 1.00 5.00 4♦ S -1 ♠6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Payne-Perkins
120 0.00 6.00 2N W ♣A 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
16 |
♠K85
♥QJT97
♦QJ74
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.50 0.50 4♦ W ♣3 1-Osborn-Burke vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
130 5.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♥3 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ording-Ording
140 4.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Dean-Williams
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♣3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
180 2.00 4.00 2N W +2 ♥Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
200 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +3 ♠9 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Kerner-Smith
660 0.00 6.00 3N W +2 ♥9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
17 |
♠A9632
♥73
♦A954
♣T8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♦ 1♠ 2/-NT ♥5 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.50 0.50 2N W -3 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Kerner-Smith
150 5.50 0.50 2N W -3 ♥7 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Dean-Williams
140 4.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♣4 1-Osborn-Burke vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ S ♣2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ S ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Tainty-Harken
50 1.00 5.00 3♣ E -1 ♠Q 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ording-Ording
120 0.00 6.00 1N W +1 ♥3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠J7432
♥9
♦953
♣AK43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3/4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠A 1-Osborn-Burke vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 5.50 0.50 2♦ S +1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
100 3.50 2.50 3N W -2 ♦5 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 2.50 3♥ W -2 ♦3 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ording-Ording
100 1.50 4.50 3N N -1 ♣8 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Dean-Williams
100 1.50 4.50 2♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Kerner-Smith
120 0.00 6.00 2N W ♣3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
19 |
♠-
♥T74
♦AK98543
♣T54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 6.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Ording-Ording
460 4.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dean-Williams
460 4.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠3 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
430 2.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♠3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
430 2.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♦J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Kerner-Smith
430 2.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♣9 7-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Payne-Perkins
150 0.00 6.00 3♦ N +2 ♥3 1-Osborn-Burke vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|
20 |
♠K6
♥J93
♦932
♣97432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 1♥ S +4 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Ording-Ording
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠9 1-Osborn-Burke vs 2-Tainty-Harken
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ S ♣5 7-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Payne-Perkins
140 4.00 2.00 1♥ S +2 ♣Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 2.00 4.00 1♥ S +1 ♣K 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
110 0.50 5.50 2♠ E ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Kerner-Smith
110 0.50 5.50 2♠ E ♣A 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dean-Williams
|
21 |
♠A72
♥T9862
♦74
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Kerner-Smith
50 5.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥6 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
50 5.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♦7 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 6-Dean-Williams
120 1.50 4.50 2N W ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Ording-Ording
120 1.50 4.50 2N W ♥T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
120 1.50 4.50 1N W +1 ♠2 1-Osborn-Burke vs 2-Tainty-Harken
120 1.50 4.50 1N W +1 ♥2 7-Benson-Lasser vs 7-Payne-Perkins
|
22 |
♠Q9876532
♥A
♦97
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 2♠ -/1NT NT6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♣2 7-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Dean-Williams
100 4.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♠4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
100 4.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♣8 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 4.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♦6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Tainty-Harken
200 1.00 5.00 3N S -4 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
200 1.00 5.00 3N S -4 ♣4 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Kerner-Smith
200 1.00 5.00 3N S -4 ♣3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Payne-Perkins
|
23 |
♠7
♥K764
♦T9432
♣J92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♣4 7-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Dean-Williams
680 4.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Tainty-Harken
680 4.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
680 4.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣4 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
710 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +3 ♥9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Payne-Perkins
710 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +3 ♥5 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
1460 0.00 6.00 6♠ E +1 ♣4 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Kerner-Smith
|
24 |
♠4
♥QT654
♦Q853
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠6 8-Harken-Winham vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
150 4.50 1.50 4♣ S +1 ♠3 3-Allen-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Suddards
150 4.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Payne-Perkins
130 2.50 3.50 3♣ S +1 ♠K 7-Benson-Lasser vs 6-Dean-Williams
130 2.50 3.50 2♣ S +2 ♠K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Wilkinson-Burk
110 1.00 5.00 3♣ S ♥9 6-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Kerner-Smith
100 0.00 6.00 3♠ E -2 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Tainty-Harken
|