1 |
♠KQ72
♥A742
♦J
♣KJ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♠ S +2 ♥K 9-Smith-Kerner vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
140 2.63 1.38 3♠ S ♦3 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 0.75 3.25 4♦ W -1 ♠K 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
50 0.75 3.25 4♦ W -1 ♠K 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Cowen-Burk
|
2 |
♠Q9
♥QT87
♦J952
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3N W -1 ♥7 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♠7 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Cowen-Burk
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♠5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♠5 9-Smith-Kerner vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
|
3 |
♠A4
♥K8743
♦A93
♣A65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ N ♦K 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Cowen-Burk
90 2.63 1.38 1N N ♠K 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 1.38 2.63 2♥ N -1 ♠K 9-Smith-Kerner vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
110 0.13 3.88 1♠ W +1 ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
4 |
♠5
♥A4
♦862
♣QJ97532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.67 0.33 2N W ♣Q 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W ♠5 11-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Burk
600 0.33 3.67 3N W ♣7 1-Payne-Perkins vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
|
5 |
♠A97
♥T653
♦Q6
♣AK52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 2N S +1 ♣7 11-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Burk
50 1.17 2.83 2♠ W -1 ♣A 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
50 1.17 2.83 2♦ E -1 ♣4 1-Payne-Perkins vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
|
6 |
♠QJ2
♥3
♦Q5
♣KQJ9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4/5 |
EW: 3/2♥ 2/-NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3♣ N -1 ♥J 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 11-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Burk
140 0.33 3.67 3♥ E ♦8 1-Payne-Perkins vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
|
7 |
♠A974
♥AT2
♦T72
♣K52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.67 0.33 4♠ S ♥3 11-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♥3 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Smith-Kerner
100 0.33 3.67 4♠ N -1 ♣J 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
|
8 |
♠K6
♥AKQT865
♦6
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♥ N ♣A 11-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -3 ♥7 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
50 0.33 3.67 4♥ N -1 ♥3 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Smith-Kerner
|
9 |
♠A2
♥AQ982
♦QT5
♣A84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.67 0.33 4♥ N +1 ♦8 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦7 11-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.33 3.67 4N N -3 ♣5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Smith-Kerner
|
10 |
♠764
♥J2
♦A63
♣AKJ62
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 4N S ♣T 11-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 7N S -1 ♣5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
100 2.00 2.00 6♠ S -1 ♥6 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Kerner
200 0.13 3.88 6♦ S -2 ♥6 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
|
11 |
♠A742
♥Q75
♦AQJ
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5/4 |
EW: -/1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 2♥ E ♠3 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Kerner
110 3.25 0.75 2♥ E ♠3 11-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ E +1 ♠T 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
590 0.13 3.88 4♥* E ♠T 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
|
12 |
♠QJ932
♥A752
♦T
♣Q42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ S ♦A 11-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Haley-Gunter
90 2.63 1.38 1N S ♥6 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Smith-Kerner
PASS 1.38 2.63 Pass Out 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Cowen-Burk
90 0.13 3.88 1N W ♠Q 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
|
13 |
♠842
♥K96
♦T95
♣QJ93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.25 0.75 2N N ♦J 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 11-Kremers-Downing
120 3.25 0.75 1N S +1 ♥2 9-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Haley-Gunter
90 1.38 2.63 1N S ♥2 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.13 3.88 2N N -2 ♠3 1-Payne-Perkins vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠AT9742
♥J4
♦K5
♣972
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4/3♠ ♣6 ♦6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♠ N +1 ♦J 9-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♣3 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 11-Kremers-Downing
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ N ♥A 1-Payne-Perkins vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠KT95
♥A983
♦T74
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 4♣ S +1 ♦K 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 2.63 1.38 4♣ S ♥7 1-Payne-Perkins vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ S ♦K 9-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Haley-Gunter
100 0.13 3.88 5♣ N -1 ♦8 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 11-Kremers-Downing
|
16 |
♠A3
♥J732
♦T85
♣A752
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣Q 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣Q 4-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Smith-Kerner
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♠6 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 3.50 1N E -1 ♦2 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 11-Kremers-Downing
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ W -1 ♥7 1-Payne-Perkins vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
|
17 |
♠-
♥K762
♦K762
♣AJ974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠5 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣T 1-Payne-Perkins vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣T 4-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Smith-Kerner
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♣T 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 11-Kremers-Downing
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣T 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠AT
♥QJ98643
♦7
♣J72
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♥ ♣5/4 ♦5 ♠4/3 NT6/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♠K 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♥K 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 11-Kremers-Downing
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♦8 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Haley-Gunter
120 1.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♦4 1-Payne-Perkins vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥Q 4-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Smith-Kerner
|
19 |
♠63
♥KT74
♦A76
♣KJ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♣ E -3 ♠5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♠6 6-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Cowen-Burk
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♣5 11-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Smith-Kerner
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 ♦9 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
|
20 |
♠87
♥T973
♦AK72
♣Q85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +3 ♦T 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
180 3.00 1.00 2N S +2 ♣4 6-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Cowen-Burk
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♠6 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S ♣4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -1 ♣4 11-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Smith-Kerner
|
21 |
♠KQJT865
♥T2
♦65
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♦A 11-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Smith-Kerner
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ E +1 ♣5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 2.00 2.00 4♦ E +2 ♠A 6-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Cowen-Burk
400 1.00 3.00 5♦ E ♠A 12-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Millslagle-McNeal
420 0.00 4.00 5♦ E +1 ♠A 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Raphael-Elkins
|
22 |
♠KQ63
♥K64
♦54
♣T965
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N E ♦A 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ W ♦5 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Burk
120 1.38 2.63 1N E +1 ♦A 6-Haley-Gunter vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
150 0.13 3.88 2♦ S -3 ♣7 11-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
23 |
♠Q
♥A93
♦KT83
♣T9643
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ S ♣A 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Burk
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ S ♦Q 6-Haley-Gunter vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 0.75 3.25 3♥ S -1 ♠7 11-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 0.75 3.25 3♥ S -1 ♦9 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
24 |
♠K864
♥Q543
♦T3
♣963
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT ♦5 |
EW: 2/1♦ ♣5/4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3♦ E -1 ♠9 7-Millslagle-McNeal vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.63 1.38 3N S -2 ♦4 11-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 0.75 3.25 4♥ N -3 ♠5 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Burk
150 0.75 3.25 3♥ N -3 ♦9 6-Haley-Gunter vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♥ N ♠A 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦Q 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 6-Haley-Gunter
100 0.33 3.67 3♥ S -2 ♦6 4-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♣ S +1 ♦T 4-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣9 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.33 3.67 3♥ W ♣T 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3♠ S -1 ♥A 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W ♠7 4-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 0.33 3.67 4♦ W +1 ♠T 8-Raphael-Elkins vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|