1 |
♠AQJ92
♥T6
♦AT
♣A643
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 2N S +1 ♥5 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 2.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♥2 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦J 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♦J 4-Evenden-Burke vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
2 |
♠K96
♥KQ72
♦K3
♣AK94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♥3 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-Smith
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠Q 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦4 4-Evenden-Burke vs 2-Harken-Harken
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♠3 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
3 |
♠75
♥AQ943
♦AJT6
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♥ 1/2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ S -2 ♣K 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -3 ♣K 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
500 1.00 2.00 5♠* S -3 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-Smith
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♠8 4-Evenden-Burke vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
4 |
♠AJ85
♥Q53
♦Q763
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 1♦ 5♥ 7♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +3 ♣5 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
660 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦J 4-Evenden-Burke vs 2-Harken-Harken
660 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦J 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
620 0.00 3.00 5♣ S +1 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠Q843
♥J4
♦AJ5
♣8654
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥7 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Harken-Harken
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥6 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
300 1.00 2.00 4♥* W -2 ♦5 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥7 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
6 |
♠QJT7642
♥J5
♦J3
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5/4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ W +1 ♥J 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ W +2 ♥J 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Burke
150 1.50 1.50 4♣ E +1 ♠A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Harken-Harken
300 0.00 3.00 3♠* N -2 ♦A 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
|
7 |
♠Q
♥KQ74
♦QT632
♣T82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♠Q 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Burke
90 1.00 2.00 1N W ♠Q 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Harken-Harken
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E ♠J 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
|
8 |
♠73
♥95
♦J8543
♣AT92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♥9 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Harken-Harken
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♦4 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
480 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♥9 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Burke
980 0.00 3.00 6♠ W ♣A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
|
9 |
♠J65
♥A976
♦KJ2
♣QT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ E +1 ♣8 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♣7 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Evenden-Burke
680 0.17 2.83 4♠ W +2 ♠5 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
10 |
♠9642
♥43
♦K632
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 3♦ W +1 ♥4 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
660 0.83 2.17 3N W +2 ♠9 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
660 0.83 2.17 3N W +2 ♥4 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
11 |
♠T5
♥753
♦K63
♣J9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 3N S ♥K 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.83 2.17 3N S -1 ♠Q 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
50 0.83 2.17 5♣ S -1 ♣6 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
12 |
♠742
♥732
♦T92
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 3N W ♣K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Johnson-Osborn
450 0.83 2.17 4♥ W +1 ♣K 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
450 0.83 2.17 4♥ W +1 ♣K 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
13 |
♠2
♥J6532
♦AJ
♣AQJ62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣5 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♣5 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ E ♦8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
200 0.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
14 |
♠Q974
♥4
♦A3
♣A76432
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N E ♥J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Evenden-Burke
400 1.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
400 1.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
400 1.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
15 |
♠4
♥KQJ9753
♦A85
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦2 ♠2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♥ N -1 ♠K 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
200 2.00 1.00 5♥* N -1 ♠K 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥K 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
16 |
♠2
♥K7642
♦JT872
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 2/1NT ♦5/4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣4 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
100 2.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 ♠2 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 1.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♦J 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
180 0.00 3.00 2N E +2 ♦4 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|
17 |
♠J9853
♥KQ9
♦84
♣KT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2N W -2 ♦8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Harken
80 1.50 1.50 1♠ N ♥5 4-Evenden-Burke vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.17 2.83 2N N -2 ♥2 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
18 |
♠T872
♥J42
♦AK3
♣962
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ W +1 ♦A 4-Evenden-Burke vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
450 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +1 ♣8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠KJ64
♥QJ83
♦6
♣AKJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 3N N ♣4 4-Evenden-Burke vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
300 1.50 1.50 3♥ W -3 ♦6 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
200 0.17 2.83 3♥ W -2 ♣A 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
20 |
♠Q3
♥Q7
♦KQT84
♣AT73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♥ ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 2N W -2 ♠Q 4-Evenden-Burke vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
90 0.83 2.17 1N W ♦K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
90 0.83 2.17 1N W ♦4 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
21 |
♠9
♥K53
♦J876
♣KT954
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 3/2♠ ♣6 ♦2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 4♠ E -3 ♣2 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
50 0.83 2.17 4♠ E -1 ♣2 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.83 2.17 4♠ E -1 ♣2 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
22 |
♠9532
♥94
♦763
♣9863
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
580 2.83 0.17 2♣* E +2 ♠A 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
630 0.83 2.17 3N W +1 ♥9 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
630 0.83 2.17 3N W +1 ♥4 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
23 |
♠A876
♥JT9
♦QT4
♣T93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1/2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.83 0.17 3N W +1 ♥J 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♣T 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
690 0.17 2.83 3N E +3 ♣7 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
24 |
♠KJ84
♥743
♦K965
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -1 ♠A 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E ♠A 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
170 0.17 2.83 2♥ E +2 ♠A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Avenmarg-Chase
|
25 |
♠AQ9
♥982
♦AJ3
♣KT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2/3♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.17 0.83 3♥ S ♦4 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 2.17 0.83 2♥ S +1 ♦4 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 4-Evenden-Burke
50 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -1 ♠5 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
26 |
♠Q642
♥KQJT32
♦A5
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ N ♣A 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Smith
130 0.83 2.17 3♣ W +1 ♦A 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 4-Evenden-Burke
130 0.83 2.17 3♣ E +1 ♥K 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
27 |
♠AK983
♥J4
♦Q8762
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Smith
50 0.83 2.17 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 4-Evenden-Burke
50 0.83 2.17 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
28 |
♠K94
♥K86
♦A972
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.83 0.17 1N E ♦2 6-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Harken-Harken
120 1.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♦2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 0.17 2.83 1N W +2 ♥6 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 4-Evenden-Burke
|