1 |
♠875
♥AQJ92
♦7
♣A864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♥5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 ♥T 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 ♠5 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ E -1 ♥8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Keen-Loops
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
2 |
♠KQ86
♥64
♦Q9743
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4/5 ♦3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥7 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
500 2.00 2.00 4♥* W -3 ♠K 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♥9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥7 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Keen-Loops
|
3 |
♠QT72
♥T764
♦-
♣AJ943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 6♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Keen-Loops
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦4 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
200 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +3 ♠3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 0.50 3.50 6♥ S -1 ♠3 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
50 0.50 3.50 6♥ S -1 ♦6 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
4 |
♠AK762
♥AT6
♦K96
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 3♠ 5NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♣J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
170 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +3 ♥4 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
140 1.00 3.00 1♠ N +2 ♥Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Keen-Loops
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 ♥3 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
5 |
♠T6
♥JT985
♦A873
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♠ E +1 ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ E ♣K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
450 0.75 3.25 4♠ W +1 ♥J 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
450 0.75 3.25 4♠ E +1 ♣K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Keen-Loops
|
6 |
♠J94
♥AT83
♦AKT2
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♥5 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
460 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♣5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Williams-Dean
430 0.50 3.50 3N S +1 ♠2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
430 0.50 3.50 3N S +1 ♥5 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
7 |
♠83
♥T876
♦KQJ
♣KT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 5♥ S ♠A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦3 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♥T 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Williams-Dean
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
8 |
♠AQJT
♥8432
♦K6
♣K52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠5 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Williams-Dean
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥J 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣4 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
|
9 |
♠KQ72
♥KJ74
♦96
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ -/2NT ♣6 ♠6 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦* W -1 ♠K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Williams-Dean
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ N +1 ♠J 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
50 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♦2 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♥T 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
|
10 |
♠A5
♥Q42
♦AJ52
♣AT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ E ♠4 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♦6 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Williams-Dean
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♠A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♠A 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
|
11 |
♠-
♥AQJT983
♦K753
♣82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ -/1♠ ♣4/6 ♦4 ♠6/7 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♦ ♣6/5 ♥2 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦4 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Keen-Loops
300 2.00 2.00 5♦* W -2 ♥A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +4 ♦2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -2 ♦4 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
12 |
♠QT7432
♥9
♦KQ864
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1/-NT ♦6 ♠3 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♠* N ♦J 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Winham-Nelson
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦J 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♠5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Keen-Loops
590 0.00 4.00 4♥* E ♦7 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
13 |
♠AKQ75
♥J5
♦J3
♣KQT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦1 ♥0 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♠ N -2 ♥3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Winham-Nelson
300 3.00 1.00 5♠ N -3 ♥3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
680 1.50 2.50 5♥ W +1 ♠A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Keen-Loops
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +2 ♠A 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
1050 0.00 4.00 5♥* E +1 ♠A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
14 |
♠QJT6
♥KQJT
♦K6
♣A32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦4/3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠9 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Keen-Loops
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ S +1 ♣5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Winham-Nelson
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ S +1 ♣4 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
15 |
♠K
♥AKT2
♦QT8
♣AKJ42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♠3 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Keen-Loops
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♦A 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Williams-Dean
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ N +1 ♦6 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
16 |
♠-
♥KQJ752
♦KJ93
♣743
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 ♥4 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Williams-Dean
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♥4 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N ♣K 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♦2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Keen-Loops
|
17 |
♠64
♥K532
♦AJ87
♣J42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ N ♣A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ S -1 ♣3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.00 2.00 4♦* S -1 ♥9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Keen-Loops
110 1.00 3.00 1♠ E +1 ♥Q 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Williams-Dean
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♦K 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
18 |
♠AJT3
♥QJ98
♦872
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6/5 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♦4 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 ♣A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Keen-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣3 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
|
19 |
♠A96
♥JT654
♦A64
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 3/2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♥5 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♣7 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E ♦J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Keen-Loops
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E ♥Q 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Williams-Dean
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♥3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
20 |
♠KJ9762
♥Q65
♦J96
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 5♦* W -3 ♣7 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Williams-Dean
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♥7 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Keen-Loops
100 0.13 3.88 4♣ E -1 ♦T 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
21 |
♠QT85
♥94
♦Q4
♣QT974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ W ♣7 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
430 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥3 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Winham-Nelson
430 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♦8 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
490 0.50 3.50 3N E +3 ♦6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Williams-Dean
490 0.50 3.50 3N E +3 ♣3 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
22 |
♠AQ7
♥7
♦KT865
♣T973
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4/3 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♦3 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♣2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Winham-Nelson
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♥6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
23 |
♠KQ542
♥J754
♦964
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1/-♠ ♦4 ♠7/6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠9 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Winham-Nelson
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣T 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♣T 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♣3 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♣7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
24 |
♠4
♥KQ7
♦AQ542
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ 2♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♦T 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
90 2.00 2.00 1♦ N +1 ♣T 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♦6 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Winham-Nelson
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♦7 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
|
25 |
♠T6
♥Q98
♦KJ83
♣KQJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 4/5♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♠ E -2 ♣A 4-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Keen-Loops
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Davidson-Nelson
50 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♥5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Winham-Nelson
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 ♥J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Williams-Dean
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|