1 |
♠AJ987
♥A83
♦2
♣J852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠J 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Burk-Cowen
50 4.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠6 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Harken-Tainty
50 4.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♠6 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 3-Roy-Nelson
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠6 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Gunter
430 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♦6 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
450 0.00 6.00 4♥ E +1 ♦6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
2 |
♠AK75
♥AKQT94
♦T5
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
300 5.00 1.00 5♣ E -6 ♥8 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Harken-Tainty
230 4.00 2.00 3♥ N +3 ♠6 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 3-Roy-Nelson
200 3.00 3.00 2♥ N +3 ♠6 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ N +2 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 5.50 6♠ S -1 ♣T 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Burk-Cowen
100 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -1 ♣A 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Gunter
|
3 |
♠J654
♥KT876
♦QT
♣KT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 6N E -4 ♦5 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 4.50 1.50 6♠ E -1 ♥2 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 3-Roy-Nelson
100 4.50 1.50 6♠ E -1 ♥2 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
650 2.50 3.50 5♠ E ♦5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Gunter
650 2.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♠8 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Burk-Cowen
680 1.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
1430 0.00 6.00 6♠ E ♥6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
4 |
♠A964
♥753
♦QT
♣J543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♣A 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Harken-Tainty
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ E ♣A 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ E ♣A 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 2-Burk-Cowen
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ E ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Modest-Gunter
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ E ♣A 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Roy-Nelson
|
5 |
♠T2
♥T954
♦K95
♣KQ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 6.00 0.00 1N W +3 ♣3 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 2-Burk-Cowen
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Modest-Gunter
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♣K 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Harken-Tainty
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♣K 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♣3 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
980 1.00 5.00 6♠ W ♣6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Roy-Nelson
1010 0.00 6.00 6♠ W +1 ♦9 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠AQ92
♥A6
♦Q942
♣843
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♠3 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 2-Burk-Cowen
200 5.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥4 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 4.00 2.00 3♠* S -1 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Modest-Gunter
110 3.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 ♠9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Roy-Nelson
150 2.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♦K 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Harken-Tainty
180 1.00 5.00 1N W +3 ♦2 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
600 0.00 6.00 3N E ♦K 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠Q754
♥K64
♦KQT98
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♦K 5-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
200 5.50 0.50 1N W -2 ♦K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♠A 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♦2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Burk-Cowen
PASS 1.50 4.50 Pass Out 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Modest-Gunter
PASS 1.50 4.50 Pass Out 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
200 0.00 6.00 2♣ N -2 ♥3 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 3-Roy-Nelson
|
8 |
♠AQ6
♥A54
♦AT2
♣AT86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥8 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Modest-Gunter
210 5.00 1.00 1N N +4 ♥8 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 3.50 2.50 3♦ S +2 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 3.50 2.50 3♦ S +2 ♥K 5-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.50 4.50 4♦ S ♥8 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ S +1 ♥K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Burk-Cowen
90 0.00 6.00 1N N ♥8 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 3-Roy-Nelson
|
9 |
♠J5
♥93
♦J854
♣QJT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♣Q 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 3-Roy-Nelson
200 5.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♣Q 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 3.50 2.50 3N W -1 ♦4 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 3.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♣Q 5-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Burk-Cowen
150 1.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♦7 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Modest-Gunter
600 0.00 6.00 3N E ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠KJ6
♥843
♦AK743
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥5 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 2-Burk-Cowen
660 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦2 5-Harken-Winham vs 6-Modest-Gunter
630 4.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♠5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Roy-Nelson
130 3.00 3.00 4♣ S ♠8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ N ♥7 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Harken-Tainty
200 0.50 5.50 5♣ S -2 ♠7 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.50 5.50 5♣ S -2 ♥5 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠KQJ
♥QJ863
♦AJ74
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣5 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 4.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦Q 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
170 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
170 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♣3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ S +1 ♠A 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Roy-Nelson
100 1.00 5.00 4♣ W -2 ♠K 5-Harken-Winham vs 6-Modest-Gunter
50 0.00 6.00 3♣ W -1 ♠K 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 2-Burk-Cowen
|
12 |
♠65
♥AJT63
♦97
♣KJ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♦6 ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♦6 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Roy-Nelson
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Harken-Tainty
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
140 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♦2 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 4.50 2♠ E -2 ♦Q 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 2-Burk-Cowen
100 1.50 4.50 2♦ W -2 ♣3 5-Harken-Winham vs 6-Modest-Gunter
50 0.00 6.00 3♠ E -1 ♥2 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
13 |
♠K62
♥K962
♦Q2
♣K942
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♠ 6/5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5/4 ♦1/0 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 5.92 0.08 6♦ N ♥A 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 1-Harken-Tainty
690 4.17 1.83 3N S +3 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Roy-Nelson
690 4.17 1.83 3N N +3 ♣5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Burk-Cowen
620 1.83 4.17 5♦ S +1 ♣T 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
620 1.83 4.17 5♦ N +1 ♠7 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 6-Modest-Gunter
170 0.08 5.92 2♦ S +4 ♣T 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠A65
♥A42
♦J864
♣T42
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 6♣ E -3 ♣3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 4.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠A 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Burk-Cowen
50 4.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♠3 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 1.50 4.50 2N W +1 ♦4 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 1.50 4.50 2N E +1 ♦2 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 6-Modest-Gunter
150 1.50 4.50 2N E +1 ♦2 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 1.50 4.50 1N W +2 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Roy-Nelson
|
15 |
♠54
♥KT
♦8753
♣KQT52
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 6.00 0.00 3N S ♠6 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
180 5.00 1.00 1N N +3 ♥5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Burk-Cowen
150 4.00 2.00 2♦ S +3 ♥2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 3.00 3♣ S ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Roy-Nelson
100 2.00 4.00 2♠ W -2 ♦3 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♣4 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 6-Modest-Gunter
140 0.00 6.00 3♥ E ♦A 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
16 |
♠K974
♥Q872
♦6532
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 2♦ S +3 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
140 5.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 3.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♣4 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Modest-Gunter
130 3.50 2.50 1♦ S +3 ♥T 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♠J 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
50 1.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Roy-Nelson
50 1.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♣3 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
17 |
♠T2
♥A62
♦943
♣QJT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 1.00 3N W ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
400 5.00 1.00 3N W ♣Q 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
400 5.00 1.00 3N W ♣5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Modest-Gunter
420 3.00 3.00 4♠ E ♦2 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Harken-Tainty
450 1.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♣Q 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Roy-Nelson
450 1.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♣Q 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.00 6.00 4♠ W +2 ♣5 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
18 |
♠43
♥987653
♦J97
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠K 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♦2 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
50 4.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Burk-Cowen
120 3.00 3.00 2N W ♠3 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Harken-Tainty
400 1.00 5.00 3N E ♠K 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
400 1.00 5.00 3N E ♠7 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Roy-Nelson
400 1.00 5.00 3N E ♠7 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Modest-Gunter
|
19 |
♠872
♥53
♦J832
♣9865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.50 0.50 4♥ W ♦8 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
620 5.50 0.50 4♥ W ♦2 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Harken-Tainty
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥3 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 6-Modest-Gunter
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠2 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♥5 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Burk-Cowen
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣5 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Roy-Nelson
|
20 |
♠KT5
♥Q3
♦A752
♣7642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 6.00 0.00 2N E +2 ♦2 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 6-Modest-Gunter
600 4.50 1.50 3N W ♦2 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Burk-Cowen
600 4.50 1.50 3N E ♥5 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
630 2.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Harken-Tainty
630 2.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦2 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Roy-Nelson
630 2.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
660 0.00 6.00 3N W +2 ♦A 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
21 |
♠84
♥QJT82
♦QJ72
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ W ♠8 1-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Burk-Cowen
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥Q 2-Bogaard-Millslagle vs 4-Wesolowski-Osborn
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥Q 3-Jacobs-Reuben vs 6-Modest-Gunter
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Harken-Tainty
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥Q 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Roy-Nelson
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 7-Suddards-Davidson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ W +1 ♣K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|