1 |
♠A9
♥QJ765
♦QT
♣KT64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5/6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.93 0.07 2♦ E -4 ♥5 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 8-Reiss-Modest
150 5.79 1.21 2N S +1 ♦6 6-Benz-Tainty vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
130 4.64 2.36 2♣ N +2 ♠3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
110 3.50 3.50 3♣ N ♠3 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Franich-Burk
50 1.79 5.21 3♦ S -1 ♠2 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
50 1.79 5.21 2♦ S -1 ♠2 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
110 0.07 6.93 2♠ W ♦Q 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
2 |
♠2
♥82
♦KQT97
♣AJ852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.93 0.07 4♥ E -2 ♣3 6-Benz-Tainty vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
PASS 5.79 1.21 Pass Out 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Franich-Burk
140 4.64 2.36 3♥ E ♣3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
170 2.36 4.64 3♥ E +1 ♦5 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
170 2.36 4.64 3♥ E +1 ♦5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
170 2.36 4.64 3♥ E +1 ♣2 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 6-Martin-Dau
420 0.07 6.93 4♥ E ♦5 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 8-Reiss-Modest
|
3 |
♠K832
♥96
♦Q85
♣K654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.64 2.36 1N S +1 ♥A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Franich-Burk
120 4.64 2.36 1N S +1 ♥K 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
120 4.64 2.36 1N S +1 ♥2 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
120 4.64 2.36 1N S +1 ♥2 6-Benz-Tainty vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
120 4.64 2.36 1N N +1 ♣3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 8-Reiss-Modest
50 1.21 5.79 3♦ S -1 ♥A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
90 0.07 6.93 2♣ E ♦A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
4 |
♠75
♥Q3
♦AKT53
♣AQ73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.93 0.07 4♥* E -2 ♦Q 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 8-Reiss-Modest
140 5.79 1.21 2♠ S +1 ♥A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Franich-Burk
100 3.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♥T 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
100 3.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♦J 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
100 3.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♣2 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 6-Martin-Dau
140 1.21 5.79 3♥ E ♦Q 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
200 0.07 6.93 3♠ S -2 ♥A 6-Benz-Tainty vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
|
5 |
♠KJ43
♥AJ764
♦AK8
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3/4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 6.36 0.64 6♣ S ♠A 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
1370 6.36 0.64 6♣ N ♠9 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
630 4.07 2.93 3N N +1 ♠5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Martin-Dau
630 4.07 2.93 3N N +1 ♥T 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 8-Reiss-Modest
620 2.36 4.64 5♣ S +1 ♠A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
100 0.64 6.36 3N N -1 ♠9 6-Benz-Tainty vs 3-Zinman-Smith
100 0.64 6.36 3N N -1 ♦3 2-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
6 |
♠53
♥T98642
♦J95
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.93 0.07 4♠* E -2 ♦A 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 8-Reiss-Modest
420 5.21 1.79 4♥ N ♠A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Martin-Dau
420 5.21 1.79 4♥ N ♠A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
200 2.93 4.07 4♠* E -1 ♦A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Franich-Burk
200 2.93 4.07 4♠* E -1 ♣A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
50 0.64 6.36 4♣ S -1 ♠J 6-Benz-Tainty vs 3-Zinman-Smith
50 0.64 6.36 4♣ S -1 ♦4 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
|
7 |
♠QT863
♥Q43
♦4
♣9753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/-NT ♥5 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.93 0.07 3N E -3 ♥7 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
140 5.79 1.21 3♥ S ♥5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 4.07 2.93 2♠ S ♦7 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
110 4.07 2.93 2♠ S ♦6 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
110 2.36 4.64 3♦ E ♥3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 8-Reiss-Modest
200 1.21 5.79 2♠ N -2 ♠7 6-Benz-Tainty vs 3-Zinman-Smith
300 0.07 6.93 1N S -3 ♦6 2-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
8 |
♠A9
♥AJ942
♦A842
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.93 0.07 3♥ N +1 ♠4 2-Jones-Murdock vs 2-Franich-Burk
140 5.21 1.79 3♥ N ♠K 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
140 5.21 1.79 2♥ N +1 ♦7 6-Benz-Tainty vs 3-Zinman-Smith
100 3.50 3.50 4♠ E -2 ♥Q 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
50 2.36 4.64 3♠ E -1 ♥6 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
50 1.21 5.79 4♥ N -1 ♠K 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Martin-Dau
140 0.07 6.93 3♠ E ♥6 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 8-Reiss-Modest
|
9 |
♠A9
♥AQJ985
♦QT3
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♣6/7 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.07 2.93 3♥ N ♣A 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
140 4.07 2.93 3♥ N ♣A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
140 4.07 2.93 3♥ N ♣A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
140 4.07 2.93 3♥ N ♣A 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 6-Martin-Dau
140 4.07 2.93 3♥ N ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Reiss-Modest
140 4.07 2.93 2♥ N +1 ♣A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Smith
50 0.07 6.93 4♥ N -1 ♣A 6-Benz-Tainty vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
10 |
♠AT75
♥T4
♦AQ43
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.93 0.07 4♠ N +1 ♣A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
630 5.79 1.21 3N S +1 ♥3 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Reiss-Modest
600 2.36 4.64 3N S ♥3 2-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
600 2.36 4.64 3N S ♥3 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Smith
600 2.36 4.64 3N S ♣9 6-Benz-Tainty vs 2-Franich-Burk
600 2.36 4.64 3N N ♠3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
600 2.36 4.64 3N N ♠3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
11 |
♠QT863
♥JT
♦QJ
♣KQ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2/3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 6.93 0.07 2N W +2 ♦Q 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
420 4.64 2.36 4♥ W ♠6 6-Benz-Tainty vs 2-Franich-Burk
420 4.64 2.36 4♥ W ♠3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
420 4.64 2.36 4♥ W ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Reiss-Modest
450 2.36 4.64 4♥ W +1 ♣K 2-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
480 1.21 5.79 4♥ W +2 ♠3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 6-Martin-Dau
500 0.07 6.93 3♠* N -3 ♥2 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Smith
|
12 |
♠AT83
♥T97
♦K65
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.93 0.07 3N E -3 ♥5 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Zinman-Smith
100 5.79 1.21 3N E -2 ♥A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
50 4.07 2.93 3N E -1 ♥A 6-Benz-Tainty vs 2-Franich-Burk
50 4.07 2.93 3N E -1 ♥5 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
130 1.79 5.21 3♣ W +1 ♥T 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 6-Martin-Dau
130 1.79 5.21 3♣ W +1 ♥9 2-Jones-Murdock vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
150 0.07 6.93 3♣ W +2 ♥T 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Reiss-Modest
|
13 |
♠K43
♥QJ2
♦KQT76
♣62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦K 4-Evenden-Hill vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
230 6.00 1.00 2♠ E +4 ♦3 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 3-Zinman-Smith
650 4.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Franich-Burk
650 4.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣T 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 6-Martin-Dau
680 1.50 5.50 4♠ E +2 ♦3 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
680 1.50 5.50 4♠ E +2 ♦3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
680 1.50 5.50 4♠ E +2 ♣T 2-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Reiss-Modest
680 1.50 5.50 4♠ E +2 ♣T 6-Benz-Tainty vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
|
14 |
♠J9873
♥AJ4
♦642
♣62
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣6 4-Evenden-Hill vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
50 6.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥8 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Franich-Burk
120 5.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♠7 2-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Reiss-Modest
150 3.50 3.50 2N W +1 ♠7 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
150 3.50 3.50 2N E +1 ♥8 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 6-Martin-Dau
180 2.00 5.00 2N E +2 ♠Q 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 3-Zinman-Smith
400 1.00 6.00 3N E ♠Q 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
460 0.00 7.00 3N E +2 ♣J 6-Benz-Tainty vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
|
15 |
♠AJ6
♥75
♦98543
♣JT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥0/1 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 7.00 0.00 3♥ E ♣K 2-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Reiss-Modest
420 5.50 1.50 4♥ E ♥Q 4-Evenden-Hill vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
420 5.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣K 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Franich-Burk
480 2.50 4.50 4♥ E +2 ♠3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 6-Martin-Dau
480 2.50 4.50 4♥ E +2 ♣K 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
480 2.50 4.50 4♥ E +2 ♣K 6-Benz-Tainty vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
480 2.50 4.50 4♥ E +2 ♣K 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 3-Zinman-Smith
510 0.00 7.00 4♥ E +3 ♣K 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
|
16 |
♠KQ
♥97
♦QT975
♣JT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 5/4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 ♠K 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Franich-Burk
620 5.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣J 2-Jones-Murdock vs 8-Reiss-Modest
620 5.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣J 6-Benz-Tainty vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
650 2.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 6-Martin-Dau
650 2.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
650 2.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 3-Zinman-Smith
650 2.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
650 2.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♥7 4-Evenden-Hill vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
|
17 |
♠Q7
♥7
♦AT8752
♣KQ42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5NT ♠5 |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.79 1.21 3N S +3 ♠T 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Zinman-Smith
490 5.79 1.21 3N S +3 ♠6 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
490 5.79 1.21 3N S +3 ♠6 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 2-Franich-Burk
170 2.93 4.07 4♦ N +2 ♠5 6-Benz-Tainty vs 8-Reiss-Modest
170 2.93 4.07 4♦ N +2 ♥J 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
150 1.21 5.79 2♦ N +3 ♣3 2-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
130 0.07 6.93 3♣ N +1 ♠3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
|
18 |
♠KJ76
♥T83
♦KJ
♣QT84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.93 0.07 4♠ S ♣6 6-Benz-Tainty vs 8-Reiss-Modest
170 5.21 1.79 3♠ S +1 ♣6 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
170 5.21 1.79 2♠ S +2 ♣6 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
140 2.36 4.64 3♠ S ♠3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
140 2.36 4.64 3♠ S ♣6 2-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
140 2.36 4.64 2♠ S +1 ♦T 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 2-Franich-Burk
200 0.07 6.93 3♦ N -2 ♠5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Zinman-Smith
|
19 |
♠KQT7
♥AK7
♦Q7
♣T542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.93 0.07 2♠ S +2 ♥3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Zinman-Smith
140 3.50 3.50 3♠ S ♦K 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♥6 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♥3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 6-Benz-Tainty vs 8-Reiss-Modest
140 3.50 3.50 1♠ S +2 ♦K 2-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
110 0.07 6.93 1♠ S +1 ♣A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
20 |
♠J754
♥65
♦KQJ9
♣873
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.93 0.07 3♦ E +1 ♦7 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 2-Franich-Burk
150 5.79 1.21 1N E +2 ♠8 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
600 3.50 3.50 3N W ♦K 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
600 3.50 3.50 3N W ♦K 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Zinman-Smith
600 3.50 3.50 3N E ♠T 6-Benz-Tainty vs 8-Reiss-Modest
630 0.64 6.36 3N W +1 ♠4 2-Jones-Murdock vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
630 0.64 6.36 3N W +1 ♦K 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
|
21 |
♠KT974
♥76
♦QJ76
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 6.93 0.07 3N S ♣3 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
170 5.79 1.21 3♠ N +1 ♣J 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
100 3.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Franich-Burk
100 3.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♣J 2-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 3.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♣J 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Smith
200 0.64 6.36 4♠ N -2 ♦5 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 8-Reiss-Modest
200 0.64 6.36 4♠ N -2 ♣J 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
|
22 |
♠AT86532
♥T6
♦Q4
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 3/4♠ -/3NT ♣4/5 ♦4/5 NT6/9 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.93 0.07 4♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
420 5.79 1.21 4♠ N ♥A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Franich-Burk
170 3.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
170 3.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♣3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Smith
170 3.50 3.50 2♠ N +2 ♥A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Martin-Dau
140 0.64 6.36 2♠ N +1 ♥A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 8-Reiss-Modest
140 0.64 6.36 2♠ N +1 ♥A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
|
23 |
♠K752
♥K54
♦8
♣AKQ42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.79 1.21 4♠ S ♠Q 2-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Martin-Dau
620 5.79 1.21 4♠ S ♥2 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
620 5.79 1.21 4♠ S ♦J 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
100 3.50 3.50 5♠ S -1 ♥J 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 8-Reiss-Modest
300 2.36 4.64 6N S -3 ♣3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Smith
500 0.64 6.36 6♠* S -2 ♦J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Franich-Burk
500 0.64 6.36 6♠* S -2 ♦J 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
|
24 |
♠K3
♥KQ742
♦A8
♣9863
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.93 0.07 5♥* N ♣Q 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
230 5.79 1.21 3♥ N +3 ♠8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Franich-Burk
200 4.07 2.93 3♥ N +2 ♠8 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
200 4.07 2.93 3♥ N +2 ♠5 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 8-Reiss-Modest
170 1.79 5.21 3♥ N +1 ♠8 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
170 1.79 5.21 3♥ N +1 ♣3 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Smith
150 0.07 6.93 3♠ W -3 ♥K 2-Jones-Murdock vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
25 |
♠A8743
♥J3
♦AKQ
♣T82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.93 0.07 4♠ N +1 ♥T 4-Evenden-Hill vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
430 5.79 1.21 3N S +1 ♥2 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 3-Zinman-Smith
420 4.07 2.93 4♠ N ♥T 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
420 4.07 2.93 4♠ N ♥T 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
170 1.21 5.79 3♠ N +1 ♠J 6-Benz-Tainty vs 6-Martin-Dau
170 1.21 5.79 3♠ N +1 ♥T 2-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
170 1.21 5.79 3♠ N +1 ♥6 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
26 |
♠8
♥9752
♦AKJ3
♣AKJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠5/4 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 6.93 0.07 4♠* W -3 ♦A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
620 5.79 1.21 4♥ S ♠A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
140 3.50 3.50 3♠ W ♣A 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 2-Franich-Burk
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♦A 6-Benz-Tainty vs 6-Martin-Dau
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♣A 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 3-Zinman-Smith
200 1.21 5.79 4♥ N -2 ♠J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
620 0.07 6.93 4♠ W ♣A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
|
27 |
♠JT87
♥-
♦KJ832
♣J732
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3NT ♣3 ♦5 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.93 0.07 4♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
50 5.79 1.21 3♠ N -1 ♥A 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
140 3.50 3.50 3♥ E ♦A 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 3-Zinman-Smith
140 3.50 3.50 3♥ E ♦A 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 2-Franich-Burk
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♣6 6-Benz-Tainty vs 6-Martin-Dau
170 0.64 6.36 3♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
170 0.64 6.36 3♥ E +1 ♦A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
|
28 |
♠AJ5432
♥Q63
♦854
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥0/1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.36 0.64 6♥ E -1 ♠8 6-Benz-Tainty vs 6-Martin-Dau
50 6.36 0.64 6♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 1-Sabloff-Diola
420 4.64 2.36 4♥ E ♣6 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
430 3.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♣9 1-Gilbreath-Cramblet vs 3-Zinman-Smith
450 1.79 5.21 5♥ E ♠8 2-Jones-Murdock vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
450 1.79 5.21 5♥ E ♣3 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
480 0.07 6.93 4♥ E +2 ♠8 8-Laborde Bishop-Harken vs 2-Franich-Burk
|
29 |
♠Q75
♥AQ2
♦8
♣KQ8652
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.17 0.83 3♣ N +1 ♠A 2-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
130 6.17 0.83 3♣ N +1 ♠A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
100 3.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Reiss-Modest
100 3.50 3.50 5♣ N -1 ♥J 6-Benz-Tainty vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
200 0.83 6.17 4♥ S -2 ♣J 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Zinman-Smith
200 0.83 6.17 3♥ S -2 ♠9 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
30 |
♠KJ98
♥AJ9
♦T943
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4/5♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.83 0.17 3N E -1 ♥2 4-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Reiss-Modest
400 4.83 2.17 5♣ W ♠9 2-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
400 4.83 2.17 5♣ W ♥A 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
430 2.83 4.17 3N W +1 ♥9 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Zinman-Smith
460 1.50 5.50 3N E +2 ♠5 6-Benz-Tainty vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
490 0.17 6.83 4N W +2 ♠8 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
31 |
♠JT43
♥Q73
♦J97
♣872
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♣ 3/2♦ 1♠ 3/2NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.83 0.17 5♦* W -2 ♥3 2-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
100 5.50 1.50 4♦* W -1 ♥3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Reiss-Modest
50 4.17 2.83 4♦ W -1 ♥3 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 2.83 4.17 3♦ W ♥Q 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
130 1.50 5.50 3♦ W +1 ♥3 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Zinman-Smith
200 0.17 6.83 3♥ S -2 ♣K 6-Benz-Tainty vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
|
32 |
♠8763
♥Q64
♦K764
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.83 0.17 5♣ W -3 ♠8 2-Jones-Murdock vs 4-Hamlin-Hamlin
110 4.17 2.83 2♠ N ♠A 3-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Martin-Dau
110 4.17 2.83 2♥ S ♠K 6-Benz-Tainty vs 5-Spencer-Andrews
110 4.17 2.83 2♥ S ♦6 5-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Zinman-Smith
130 1.50 5.50 2♣ W +2 ♠8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Reiss-Modest
180 0.17 6.83 1N W +3 ♦4 7-Hadley-Schilling vs 7-Balassi-Ottenberg
|