1 |
♠AK8643
♥Q42
♦83
♣J8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 1♠ N -1 ♦A 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♠7 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 3-Jones-Henderson
150 1.00 2.00 2♠ N -3 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
210 0.00 3.00 2N W +3 ♠6 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
2 |
♠A965
♥J9
♦K4
♣AJT92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠J 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 3-Jones-Henderson
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠J 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠4 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
|
3 |
♠74
♥A9872
♦QT863
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 6♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
150 1.00 2.00 5♥ N -3 ♦4 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦J 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 3-Jones-Henderson
|
4 |
♠QT2
♥AJ
♦KJT54
♣T76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2/3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.50 0.50 2N W -4 ♦J 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Winham-Nelson
400 2.50 0.50 3♠ E -4 ♦8 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -2 ♦5 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 3-Jones-Henderson
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ N ♠4 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
|
5 |
♠A8642
♥KJ976
♦T6
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ N ♣Q 1-Winham-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
680 2.00 1.00 5♠ N +1 ♣Q 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 3-Jones-Henderson
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦3 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
300 0.00 3.00 5♣* E -2 ♥A 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
|
6 |
♠5432
♥T954
♦KQ
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 ♦K 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 3-Jones-Henderson
150 2.00 1.00 3♦ S -3 ♥2 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♦K 1-Winham-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
7 |
♠KJ9763
♥Q
♦T62
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣4 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♥Q 1-Winham-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
200 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -2 ♦3 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 3-Jones-Henderson
300 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
8 |
♠J9
♥98763
♦9742
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♦K 1-Winham-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
150 1.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♦K 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 3-Jones-Henderson
150 1.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
9 |
♠QJ9
♥T963
♦Q5
♣QJ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♦K 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ S +1 ♠9 1-Winham-Nelson vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ S +1 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Jones-Henderson
|
10 |
♠Q
♥743
♦AK854
♣AJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♠ ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♦ N -1 ♥K 1-Winham-Nelson vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
200 1.50 1.50 2♦ N -2 ♥K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Jones-Henderson
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ E ♣2 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
|
11 |
♠AT32
♥KQJ
♦T96
♣752
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3N W -4 ♥K 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
150 1.50 1.50 2N W -3 ♦T 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Jones-Henderson
100 0.17 2.83 3♣ E -2 ♥2 1-Winham-Nelson vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
|
12 |
♠KJ6
♥J765
♦Q
♣AT965
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 6♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5/4 ♥1 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.83 0.17 4♥ S +2 ♣K 1-Winham-Nelson vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
650 0.83 2.17 4♥ S +1 ♣K 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
650 0.83 2.17 4♥ S +1 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Jones-Henderson
|
13 |
♠AKJT
♥KQJ3
♦QJ
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♠5 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
630 0.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
630 0.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠5 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
|
14 |
♠KQ876
♥K85
♦73
♣842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♣5 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
180 1.50 1.50 2N W +2 ♠6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
180 1.50 1.50 2N E +2 ♣5 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
430 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♣5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
|
15 |
♠T8763
♥-
♦Q2
♣AQ9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1/2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♦5 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
50 2.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♠T 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
100 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♦7 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
300 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -3 ♠9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
|
16 |
♠AJ83
♥JT87
♦T8
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦0 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 7♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣J 7-Lipton-Hahn vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
600 2.00 1.00 5♦ W ♣K 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Winham-Nelson
620 1.00 2.00 5♦ W +1 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
640 0.00 3.00 5♦ E +2 ♣J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
|
17 |
♠862
♥KQT7
♦J87
♣873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♦ E +1 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
430 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥2 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
460 0.17 2.83 3N E +2 ♣9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
18 |
♠983
♥JT
♦Q98754
♣K3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ S ♠K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♣Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
50 0.17 2.83 3N E -1 ♣A 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
|
19 |
♠J53
♥KQ72
♦96
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♠ S -1 ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
90 0.83 2.17 2♦ W ♣K 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
90 0.83 2.17 2♦ W ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
|
20 |
♠2
♥QT54
♦742
♣AJ763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 2♦ W +1 ♠2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
110 2.17 0.83 2♦ W +1 ♠2 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Davidson-Nelson
130 0.17 2.83 2♦ W +2 ♠2 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
|
21 |
♠KT92
♥Q8743
♦KJ
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.83 0.17 4♥ N +1 ♦3 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
630 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠7 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
200 0.17 2.83 3♥ N +2 ♠7 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
22 |
♠AK532
♥94
♦87
♣AT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ S ♠Q 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ W ♥9 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
150 0.17 2.83 3♦ S -3 ♠Q 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
23 |
♠J4
♥A5432
♦AQ82
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.83 0.17 4♥ N +1 ♦6 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠6 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
170 0.17 2.83 2♥ N +2 ♠3 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|
24 |
♠T97
♥T7
♦KT854
♣KJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -4 ♦5 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♣K 2-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 7-Lipton-Hahn
200 0.17 2.83 3♠ W +2 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Reiss-Gamble
|
25 |
♠QJ432
♥5
♦J
♣KQJ432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦0 ♥1 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 7♦ 5♥ 4♠ 7NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 2.83 0.17 7♥* E -4 ♣T 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ E +1 ♣T 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ E +1 ♣7 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
26 |
♠AQ632
♥AQJT3
♦T
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ S -1 ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ N -1 ♦2 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
200 0.17 2.83 2♠ N -2 ♦Q 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
|
27 |
♠7
♥87
♦AKQ954
♣AQT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♦ 3♠ -/1NT ♥6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ N ♥T 5-Davidson-Nelson vs 4-Hasey-Oppenheimer
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ N ♥3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
50 0.17 2.83 3♠ S -1 ♥K 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
|
28 |
♠A865
♥AQJ8642
♦-
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT3/4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.95 1.65 4♣ W -3 ♥A 6-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Shipman Jr-Smith
100 1.65 1.95 2♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Winham-Nelson
|