1 |
♠AJ3
♥A92
♦JT765
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 1/-♥ 2/1♠ 3/2NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♥4 5-Burke-Winham vs 4-Nelson-Loops
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Williams-Dean
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♣6 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Franz-Kashap
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥4 2-Roy-Loops vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
|
2 |
♠T952
♥A542
♦T872
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N E ♠3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Franz-Kashap
400 3.50 0.50 3N E ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Williams-Dean
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠3 2-Roy-Loops vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠3 5-Burke-Winham vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|
3 |
♠532
♥A3
♦J985
♣J982
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♥ 4♠ 4/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ E +1 ♦A 2-Roy-Loops vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ E +1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Williams-Dean
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Franz-Kashap
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥4 5-Burke-Winham vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|
4 |
♠A7
♥Q3
♦J763
♣AQJT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Williams-Dean
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♥6 2-Roy-Loops vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
170 2.50 1.50 1♠ S +3 ♥4 5-Burke-Winham vs 4-Nelson-Loops
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ S ♦4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
5 |
♠5
♥A97
♦T763
♣A8765
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 ♥6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥5 5-Burke-Winham vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
170 3.00 1.00 4♦ S +2 ♠Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Loops
130 1.50 2.50 4♦ S ♥3 2-Roy-Loops vs 2-Williams-Dean
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ N +1 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -1 ♠Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
6 |
♠K86
♥5
♦KT86
♣AQT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦2 2-Roy-Loops vs 2-Williams-Dean
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♥K 5-Burke-Winham vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♣T 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Loops
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♦6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
7 |
♠A963
♥KQJ9
♦T8754
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♥ ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -3 ♥3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Loops
200 2.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ W -2 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Franz-Kashap
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ S ♠7 2-Roy-Loops vs 2-Williams-Dean
200 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 ♥5 5-Burke-Winham vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
|
8 |
♠K3
♥QT94
♦AKQ986
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3/2♥ 2/1♠ -/5NT ♣4 NT6/11 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥4/2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ N ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Franz-Kashap
300 3.00 1.00 4♣* E -2 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♠6 5-Burke-Winham vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 ♣Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Loops
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ N ♥Q 2-Roy-Loops vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
9 |
♠AQ875
♥82
♦K4
♣J754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Franz-Kashap
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥6 5-Burke-Winham vs 2-Williams-Dean
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♥K 2-Roy-Loops vs 1-Cowen-Brown
150 1.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Loops
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ S ♣A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
|
10 |
♠52
♥AT2
♦54
♣KQ9732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Loops
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 ♠5 2-Roy-Loops vs 1-Cowen-Brown
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♥A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♣K 5-Burke-Winham vs 2-Williams-Dean
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -2 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
11 |
♠K65
♥K63
♦T3
♣T9432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♦7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Roy-Loops vs 1-Cowen-Brown
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Loops
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Franz-Kashap
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ E +2 ♦5 5-Burke-Winham vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
12 |
♠AQT73
♥Q962
♦2
♣T64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2/1♦ 3/2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 ♦5 2-Roy-Loops vs 1-Cowen-Brown
400 3.00 1.00 3N W ♠3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
430 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♠7 5-Burke-Winham vs 2-Williams-Dean
430 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Loops
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
13 |
♠J6
♥KT3
♦QJ82
♣A642
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥Q 5-Burke-Winham vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Roy-Loops vs 5-Franz-Kashap
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|
14 |
♠AJ652
♥QT3
♦KT76
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3/4♠ 1NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
50 3.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♠7 5-Burke-Winham vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 2-Roy-Loops vs 5-Franz-Kashap
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♣4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ S -2 ♠8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|
15 |
♠43
♥K83
♦K75
♣JT654
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4/3♦ 2NT ♥6/5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣5 5-Burke-Winham vs 1-Cowen-Brown
130 2.50 1.50 3♣ S +1 ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Loops
130 2.50 1.50 1♣ S +3 ♠J 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Williams-Dean
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ S ♠J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ S +1 ♣K 2-Roy-Loops vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
16 |
♠A743
♥864
♦Q73
♣J98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥0 ♠4/3 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 5♦ 7♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 ♦9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Williams-Dean
600 3.00 1.00 5♦ W ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
630 2.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠6 5-Burke-Winham vs 1-Cowen-Brown
1390 0.50 3.50 6♣ E +1 ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Loops
1390 0.50 3.50 6♣ E +1 ♠6 2-Roy-Loops vs 5-Franz-Kashap
|
17 |
♠JT8
♥JT97
♦Q
♣KQJ73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣A 5-Burke-Winham vs 5-Franz-Kashap
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♦J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Williams-Dean
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
500 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -3 ♣A 2-Roy-Loops vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|
18 |
♠AT985
♥843
♦QJT
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
50 3.00 1.00 5♣ W -1 ♦Q 2-Roy-Loops vs 4-Nelson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣K 5-Burke-Winham vs 5-Franz-Kashap
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ W ♠A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
170 0.00 4.00 4♣ W +2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Williams-Dean
|
19 |
♠Q854
♥J643
♦AKJ7
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠7 2-Roy-Loops vs 4-Nelson-Loops
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Williams-Dean
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 5-Burke-Winham vs 5-Franz-Kashap
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +2 ♥7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
20 |
♠AQJ9
♥3
♦AKT9
♣AK43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 5♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1NT ♣5/6 ♦2/3 ♠2 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
90 3.00 1.00 1♣ N +1 ♥K 5-Burke-Winham vs 5-Franz-Kashap
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Turnquist-Burk
100 1.50 2.50 4♦ N -1 ♥K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Williams-Dean
670 0.00 4.00 2♥* E ♦2 2-Roy-Loops vs 4-Nelson-Loops
|