1 |
♠QT98
♥AT65
♦KQ865
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1/2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +2 ♠J 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +2 ♥3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 ♣A 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
150 0.00 3.00 3N S -3 ♣3 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
2 |
♠T864
♥T54
♦984
♣JT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♣A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Smith
400 2.00 1.00 3N E ♥6 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
430 1.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♦5 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♠J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
|
3 |
♠543
♥J762
♦8
♣Q6543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5/6 ♦1 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 6♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 ♣J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 ♦6 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
170 0.50 2.50 4♦ E +2 ♥A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Smith
170 0.50 2.50 4♦ E +2 ♣4 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
4 |
♠32
♥654
♦KJT742
♣52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♣ W +1 ♦2 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Zinman-Karter
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♠Q 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.50 1.50 3♣ W +3 ♠3 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 3.00 5♣ W +1 ♠3 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
5 |
♠T6
♥AK872
♦Q74
♣953
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥A 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ W +2 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Harken
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♣A 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +3 ♣9 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠AQJ98
♥QJ973
♦A
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Harken
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 ♦J 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +2 ♥A 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
|
7 |
♠K4
♥AQJ93
♦Q965
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 5♥ S ♥2 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠7 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Harken
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠3 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ S +2 ♥2 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
8 |
♠T742
♥J642
♦QJ72
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦4 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣K 5-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Harken
430 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♣K 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦8 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
|
9 |
♠J72
♥AKJ4
♦873
♣962
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 2♣ S +2 ♥9 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
120 2.00 1.00 2N N ♥5 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 3-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 2.00 4♣ S -2 ♦Q 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Zinman-Karter
300 0.00 3.00 3♠* S -2 ♥9 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
10 |
♠AK6
♥Q654
♦Q96
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♣J 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 3-Harken-Harken
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Zinman-Karter
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
11 |
♠K963
♥QT87
♦AK2
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠Q 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Zinman-Karter
430 1.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠2 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 3-Harken-Harken
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠Q 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
12 |
♠K3
♥KQJ53
♦T8764
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6♣ W -1 ♥K 1-Smith-Smith vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
460 1.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♥K 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Zinman-Karter
460 1.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♥K 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 3-Harken-Harken
490 0.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♥K 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
13 |
♠Q984
♥K9
♦AKQ7
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♥3 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
180 2.00 1.00 1N N +3 ♣6 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♣6 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣6 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
|
14 |
♠K7
♥3
♦QJT95
♣AJT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥3 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♥3 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ W ♦Q 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Zinman-Karter
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
15 |
♠T753
♥Q7
♦75
♣J8732
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♣2 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦7 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠2 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Zinman-Karter
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦7 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠KJ5
♥AQ9842
♦Q92
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3/2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ N -2 ♦A 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 1.50 1.50 2N W +1 ♥9 7-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Zinman-Karter
150 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -3 ♣A 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
630 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥9 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
17 |
♠T8642
♥K8
♦KQ7
♣A82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♣4 1-Smith-Smith vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
100 2.00 1.00 3N N -2 ♦J 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
150 0.50 2.50 3N N -3 ♦9 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
150 0.50 2.50 2N S -3 ♥9 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
|
18 |
♠43
♥A754
♦K983
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♥J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N ♠6 1-Smith-Smith vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
PASS 0.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
PASS 0.50 2.50 Pass Out 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠75
♥T62
♦AT9643
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠2 1-Smith-Smith vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♦8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦8 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦8 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
20 |
♠8643
♥KT72
♦A643
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠A 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ S ♠Q 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠K 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 5-Zinman-Karter
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♠A 1-Smith-Smith vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
|
21 |
♠T87
♥AQT986
♦AJ7
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦5 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
50 1.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 ♥J 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 ♥J 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Smith
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E ♥2 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
22 |
♠K8
♥JT84
♦AQT93
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 ♦4 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
100 2.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 ♥J 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
100 1.00 2.00 1N N -2 ♣J 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♣5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
23 |
♠T764
♥Q963
♦AK
♣Q95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠8 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠8 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Smith
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠8 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ S ♠8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
24 |
♠8653
♥AT2
♦AJT63
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♦5 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♠A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Smith-Smith
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ N ♠A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 6-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥8 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
|
25 |
♠872
♥432
♦Q732
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ 1♠ ♣3/4 ♦4/5 ♥6/7 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 3.00 0.00 2♠* S ♥A 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♥A 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 3.00 2♠* S -1 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
26 |
♠AQJ742
♥74
♦KQ96
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♥A 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ N ♥A 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ N ♥A 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
|
27 |
♠AJT8
♥KQ94
♦76
♣K93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 3.00 0.00 2N N +3 ♠2 6-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
180 2.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♥J 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
150 1.00 2.00 2♣ N +3 ♥J 5-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ S ♦9 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
28 |
♠7
♥AKJ8
♦KT85
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♥ E -3 ♠Q 5-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦2 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
200 0.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♥2 8-Schamberg-Feldstein vs 7-Avenmarg-Chase
|