| 1 |
♠752
♥AK7
♦AT743
♣74
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Dean-Williams
130 4.50 1.50 4♦ N ♠A 4-Benich-Benich vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
130 4.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
50 2.50 3.50 4♦ N -1 ♠A 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 2.50 3.50 4♣ S -1 ♦J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
150 0.50 5.50 3N S -3 ♠J 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 13-Swetland-Webb
150 0.50 5.50 3N S -3 ♠8 15-Yang-Sun vs 11-Harken-Burk
|
| 2 |
♠K984
♥QJ532
♦T87
♣T
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣A 15-Yang-Sun vs 11-Harken-Burk
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣A 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
130 3.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 13-Swetland-Webb
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ S ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 1.00 5.00 4♣ W -2 ♦T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Dean-Williams
50 0.00 6.00 4♣ W -1 ♦7 4-Benich-Benich vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 3 |
♠AQT94
♥K8
♦Q73
♣A42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/3♥ ♦4 ♠2/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Dean-Williams
420 4.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦T 4-Benich-Benich vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
420 4.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥6 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 13-Swetland-Webb
200 2.50 3.50 3♠ N +2 ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
200 2.50 3.50 3♠ N +2 ♥7 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 15-Yang-Sun
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ N +1 ♥4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 ♥7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
|
| 4 |
♠T943
♥KJ97
♦Q2
♣532
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2/0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠4 NT0 |
| EW: 4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♦ E +1 ♥6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Dean-Williams
170 4.50 1.50 2♦ E +4 ♥6 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 15-Yang-Sun
170 4.50 1.50 2♦ E +4 ♥6 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 13-Swetland-Webb
600 2.50 3.50 3N W ♥7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
600 2.50 3.50 3N W ♥7 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
630 0.50 5.50 3N W +1 ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
630 0.50 5.50 3N W +1 ♥7 4-Benich-Benich vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 5 |
♠3
♥A5
♦AT6532
♣A963
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥J 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Burk
100 4.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥J 4-Benich-Benich vs 13-Swetland-Webb
100 4.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♥J 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 10-Johnson-Keen
100 4.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♠7 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 8-Dean-Williams
170 2.00 4.00 3♥ E +1 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
200 0.50 5.50 3♠ S -2 ♥J 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 12-Smith-Reuben
200 0.50 5.50 5♦ N -2 ♥K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 6 |
♠AT985
♥K74
♦AJT
♣42
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥J 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Burk
150 5.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♠4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 8-Dean-Williams
130 4.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♣A 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 10-Johnson-Keen
120 3.00 3.00 2N N ♠4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ S ♦9 4-Benich-Benich vs 13-Swetland-Webb
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♥J 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 12-Smith-Reuben
50 0.50 5.50 4♦ N -1 ♠4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 7 |
♠K984
♥6
♦Q82
♣KT852
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 6.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♣Q 15-Yang-Sun vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
650 5.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥9 4-Benich-Benich vs 13-Swetland-Webb
620 4.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣3 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 10-Johnson-Keen
200 3.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♥9 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 8-Dean-Williams
100 2.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ E ♦K 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Burk
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 ♥6 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 12-Smith-Reuben
|
| 8 |
♠Q92
♥T3
♦K8765
♣Q72
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2/4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT2/3 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠2 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 10-Johnson-Keen
110 4.50 1.50 1♥ E +1 ♦6 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 8-Dean-Williams
110 4.50 1.50 3♣ E ♠A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 12-Smith-Reuben
130 3.00 3.00 2♣ E +2 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Burk
200 1.00 5.00 2♦ N -4 ♣A 4-Benich-Benich vs 13-Swetland-Webb
400 0.00 6.00 3N E ♠A 15-Yang-Sun vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 9 |
♠JT
♥AK64
♦A73
♣J764
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♣T 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
200 5.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♣T 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Harken-Burk
170 3.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♠A 15-Yang-Sun vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
170 3.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♣5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Dean-Williams
100 2.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 ♣T 4-Benich-Benich vs 12-Smith-Reuben
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ E ♣T 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
140 0.00 6.00 3♠ E ♣T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 10 |
♠AKQT76
♥AK8
♦875
♣2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♠8 4-Benich-Benich vs 12-Smith-Reuben
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♠3 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Dean-Williams
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥8 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Harken-Burk
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♣4 15-Yang-Sun vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
630 0.00 6.00 3N N +1 ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 11 |
♠QT874
♥QJT
♦AJ9
♣83
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♠ N -2 ♦Q 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
150 4.50 1.50 4♦ W +1 ♠7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Dean-Williams
150 4.50 1.50 3♣ W +2 ♣9 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Harken-Burk
170 2.00 4.00 4♣ W +2 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 13-Swetland-Webb
170 2.00 4.00 4♣ W +2 ♠7 4-Benich-Benich vs 12-Smith-Reuben
170 2.00 4.00 4♣ W +2 ♥Q 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
500 0.00 6.00 5♠* N -3 ♦Q 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 15-Yang-Sun
|
| 12 |
♠82
♥T965
♦52
♣QJ872
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♣Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Dean-Williams
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Benich-Benich vs 12-Smith-Reuben
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 4.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 13-Swetland-Webb
50 4.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 11-Harken-Burk
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ E ♦A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Johnson-Keen
170 0.00 6.00 2♠ E +2 ♦A 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 15-Yang-Sun
|
| 13 |
♠KQ3
♥A8
♦K9652
♣A42
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3/2 ♦3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♠6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
100 5.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♠6 15-Yang-Sun vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 5.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♥5 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 8-Dean-Williams
200 2.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♠6 4-Benich-Benich vs 11-Harken-Burk
200 2.50 3.50 2N N -2 ♥Q 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 13-Swetland-Webb
300 1.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♠6 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 10-Johnson-Keen
400 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -4 ♥3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 14 |
♠KJ9
♥Q952
♦Q96
♣K63
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 1/-♣ 3♥ ♣7/6 ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 4-Benich-Benich vs 11-Harken-Burk
100 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -2 ♦6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
100 4.00 2.00 3♥ W -2 ♠9 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 13-Swetland-Webb
100 4.00 2.00 3♥* W -1 ♦6 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 10-Johnson-Keen
50 2.00 4.00 4♥ W -1 ♦Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
140 1.00 5.00 3♥ W ♦6 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 8-Dean-Williams
530 0.00 6.00 3♥* W ♠9 15-Yang-Sun vs 12-Smith-Reuben
|
| 15 |
♠AQ94
♥A3
♦K85
♣AQ97
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 1/3NT
♥6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥6 ♠4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 6.00 0.00 3N N ♣4 4-Benich-Benich vs 11-Harken-Burk
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥4 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 10-Johnson-Keen
100 4.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♣T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 15-Yang-Sun
200 2.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♣4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
200 2.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♥4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 13-Swetland-Webb
200 2.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♣T 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 8-Dean-Williams
300 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -3 ♣T 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 16 |
♠T62
♥A65
♦AQ73
♣K64
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠3 4-Benich-Benich vs 11-Harken-Burk
460 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥3 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 8-Dean-Williams
400 3.50 2.50 3N S ♥2 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 10-Johnson-Keen
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♠4 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
150 2.00 4.00 2N S +1 ♠3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 15-Yang-Sun
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♠9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
50 0.50 5.50 3♠ S -1 ♥9 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 17 |
♠643
♥K93
♦KT2
♣6543
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 5♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 1.00 5♠ S ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
450 5.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥8 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Dean-Williams
450 5.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥8 15-Yang-Sun vs 10-Johnson-Keen
420 3.00 3.00 4♠ S ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 11-Harken-Burk
50 2.00 4.00 5♣ W -1 ♠6 2-Grant-Nelson vs 13-Swetland-Webb
50 1.00 5.00 5♠ S -1 ♣A 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 0.00 6.00 5♠* S -1 ♦5 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 18 |
♠J765
♥KJ93
♦Q
♣AQ85
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ -/1♠ ♥3 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 11-Harken-Burk
150 4.50 1.50 4♦ E -3 ♠9 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Dean-Williams
150 4.50 1.50 3♦ E -3 ♠9 15-Yang-Sun vs 10-Johnson-Keen
100 3.00 3.00 4♠ E -2 ♥5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 13-Swetland-Webb
50 1.50 4.50 2N W -1 ♣5 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 1.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♥J 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 12-Smith-Reuben
90 0.00 6.00 1♣ W +1 ♦Q 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 19 |
♠KT3
♥874
♦T98
♣J875
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 1♠ S +3 ♦Q 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Dean-Williams
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ S ♦Q 4-Benich-Benich vs 15-Yang-Sun
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ S ♦Q 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 12-Smith-Reuben
140 3.50 2.50 3♠ S ♦5 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 13-Swetland-Webb
100 0.50 5.50 4♥ W -1 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 11-Harken-Burk
100 0.50 5.50 4♥ W -1 ♠3 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 20 |
♠AKT3
♥9
♦Q9872
♣J76
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♥9 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
200 4.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 ♥9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 11-Harken-Burk
200 4.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 ♥9 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Dean-Williams
100 2.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♦3 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
100 2.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♣4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 12-Smith-Reuben
110 0.50 5.50 2♠ W ♥9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 13-Swetland-Webb
110 0.50 5.50 2♠ W ♥9 4-Benich-Benich vs 15-Yang-Sun
|
| 21 |
♠965
♥95
♦JT872
♣J96
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 5♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠3 15-Yang-Sun vs 8-Dean-Williams
50 5.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
400 4.00 2.00 3N E ♥4 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
430 2.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 11-Harken-Burk
430 2.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 10-Johnson-Keen
430 2.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣2 4-Benich-Benich vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
460 0.00 6.00 3N E +2 ♥4 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 22 |
♠J94
♥J98
♦987
♣K943
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 2N E +1 ♥2 15-Yang-Sun vs 8-Dean-Williams
180 5.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♦2 4-Benich-Benich vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
600 3.50 2.50 3N E ♥2 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
600 3.50 2.50 3N E ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 10-Johnson-Keen
620 2.00 4.00 4♠ W ♥8 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 11-Harken-Burk
630 0.50 5.50 3N W +1 ♣3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
630 0.50 5.50 3N E +1 ♥2 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 23 |
♠Q983
♥KT76
♦97
♣964
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 6.00 0.00 2N S ♦3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 10-Johnson-Keen
100 4.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 15-Yang-Sun
100 4.50 1.50 2♦ W -1 ♥6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
90 3.00 3.00 1N S ♦4 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 11-Harken-Burk
100 1.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♦4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 1.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♦4 4-Benich-Benich vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
200 0.00 6.00 2N S -2 ♦Q 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 13-Swetland-Webb
|
| 24 |
♠Q7
♥T943
♦QT
♣JT974
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♠3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 5.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 ♣J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 10-Johnson-Keen
50 3.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
50 3.50 2.50 3♦ E -1 ♠A 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 11-Harken-Burk
50 1.50 4.50 3♠ S -1 ♦6 4-Benich-Benich vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 1.50 4.50 3♥ S -1 ♦6 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 13-Swetland-Webb
100 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -2 ♣A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 15-Yang-Sun
|
| 25 |
♠KT652
♥Q74
♦K7
♣954
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♣ S -2 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
110 4.50 1.50 3♦ E ♣3 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 10-Johnson-Keen
110 4.50 1.50 2♦ E +1 ♠Q 4-Benich-Benich vs 8-Dean-Williams
130 2.00 4.00 3♦ E +1 ♠Q 15-Yang-Sun vs 13-Swetland-Webb
130 2.00 4.00 2♦ E +2 ♠Q 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 12-Smith-Reuben
130 2.00 4.00 2♦ E +2 ♥6 2-Grant-Nelson vs 11-Harken-Burk
600 0.00 6.00 3N W ♠5 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
|
| 26 |
♠842
♥742
♦A7
♣AT954
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦A 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
100 5.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♦5 4-Benich-Benich vs 8-Dean-Williams
140 4.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 12-Smith-Reuben
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♥6 15-Yang-Sun vs 13-Swetland-Webb
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♦5 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 10-Johnson-Keen
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♣K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
600 0.00 6.00 3N E ♦2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 11-Harken-Burk
|
| 27 |
♠A4
♥Q42
♦AJ76
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 11-Harken-Burk
430 5.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥8 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
430 5.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥J 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 15-Yang-Sun
50 2.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥J 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 12-Smith-Reuben
50 2.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥9 4-Benich-Benich vs 8-Dean-Williams
100 0.50 5.50 3N N -2 ♥J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
100 0.50 5.50 3N N -2 ♥J 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 10-Johnson-Keen
|
| 28 |
♠KT9754
♥AJ3
♦Q6
♣T9
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♠3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 9-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 4.50 1.50 3♣ E -1 ♠3 5-Millslagle-Hilton vs 10-Johnson-Keen
50 4.50 1.50 3♣ E -1 ♠3 6-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 12-Smith-Reuben
100 3.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥7 4-Benich-Benich vs 8-Dean-Williams
120 1.50 4.50 2N E ♠3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 11-Harken-Burk
120 1.50 4.50 1N E +1 ♠3 7-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 14-Reiss-Gamble
200 0.00 6.00 2♠ N -2 ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 15-Yang-Sun
|