1 |
♠86
♥974
♦A9765
♣752
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠K 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣5 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦4 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
2 |
♠KJT85
♥Q654
♦J8
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ W ♦8 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E ♣4 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠J
♥JT9763
♦T742
♣A6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -3 ♥A 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
300 1.50 0.50 3♠ E -3 ♥A 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♣A 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
4 |
♠J2
♥T98
♦QT2
♣65432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 2.00 0.00 4N W +3 ♥T 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
1430 1.00 1.00 6♥ E ♣K 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
1440 0.00 2.00 6N E ♠2 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
5 |
♠K
♥KQJ76
♦KT
♣J9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♥8 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♥K 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 0.50 1.50 5♦ E -2 ♥A 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
6 |
♠975432
♥T854
♦QJ
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4/3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣8 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Zinman-Karter
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥A 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣T 2-Smith-Brown vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
7 |
♠653
♥AK95
♦QT974
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5/4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♣2 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
120 1.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♦5 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 2-Smith-Brown
200 0.00 2.00 2♣ S -2 ♥J 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
8 |
♠JT97
♥AK3
♦QT
♣KQJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N ♥2 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
150 1.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♦4 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
120 0.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥Q 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 2-Smith-Brown
|
9 |
♠QT5
♥J9853
♦AK6
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♥K 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
50 0.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♣A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 0.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♣A 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 2-Smith-Brown
|
10 |
♠AQ
♥QT92
♦T8632
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♣9 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 2-Smith-Brown
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 ♣9 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♠2 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
11 |
♠QJ9
♥QJT6
♦952
♣972
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦6 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 2-Smith-Brown
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♥A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♦3 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
12 |
♠K6
♥A6
♦A754
♣QT653
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.75 0.25 2♥ E -2 ♣4 5-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
300 0.25 1.75 1N N -3 ♦Q 3-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
13 |
♠K4
♥QT876
♦Q4
♣T876
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 6♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♣A 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♣A 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
14 |
♠KT976
♥J
♦Q3
♣98432
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 5♥* W -2 ♦Q 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
150 1.00 1.00 5♥ W -3 ♦Q 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
50 0.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♦Q 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
15 |
♠AQ64
♥AQJ97
♦AT6
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠J 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
680 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♥6 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
660 0.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣6 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
|
16 |
♠KT9843
♥JT
♦A432
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♠J 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♥3 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -3 ♥3 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
17 |
♠AQ73
♥K
♦KT6
♣AT842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3/4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣5 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣K 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♦Q 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠AK76432
♥QJ
♦73
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♣5 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦4 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 2-Smith-Brown
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠32
♥Q96
♦QJT3
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♠3 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥6 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦Q 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
|
20 |
♠KJ872
♥KT3
♦93
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♥ 4/5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +2 ♦K 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
|
21 |
♠AJ52
♥Q8
♦K9
♣K9863
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 2.00 0.00 6♠ N ♦8 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦8 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦3 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
22 |
♠KT
♥A43
♦KQ75
♣AJT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 4N S +1 ♥6 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♥K 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
50 0.00 2.00 6♦ S -1 ♣6 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
|
23 |
♠KQ986
♥AK873
♦4
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦4 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣6 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Shepardson-Nelson
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥6 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
|
24 |
♠A2
♥A864
♦K53
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ -/1♥ ♥6/7 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.75 0.25 1♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Oppenheimer-Smith vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
170 0.25 1.75 3♠ W +1 ♦3 5-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Smith-Brown
|
25 |
♠T976543
♥T5
♦6
♣Q76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3/2♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ N -1 ♣9 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 1.00 5♠ S -2 ♦6 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
250 0.00 2.00 3N S -5 ♦Q 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
26 |
♠K9832
♥7
♦T9653
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 1.50 0.50 2N E -5 ♣5 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
500 1.50 0.50 2♥* W -2 ♣Q 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♦4 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
|
27 |
♠A2
♥KQT872
♦T94
♣K8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.00 1.00 5♥ S +1 ♦5 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
480 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠Q 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
480 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♦6 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
28 |
♠J3
♥QJ4
♦872
♣QT872
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥6 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♦3 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
|
29 |
♠AK76
♥JT3
♦K3
♣KJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.00 0.00 1♥ E ♣2 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ W ♠A 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ E ♠3 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
|
30 |
♠AJT43
♥KQT94
♦J
♣98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S ♠9 6-Faircrest-Walker vs 5-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 1.00 1♠ E -2 ♣A 2-Smith-Brown vs 3-Winham-Avenmarg
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W ♣9 4-Shepardson-Nelson vs 1-Oppenheimer-Smith
|