1 |
♠J975
♥A92
♦QT843
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 2/3♠ ♣2 ♥2/4 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Keen-Winham
130 5.00 1.00 4♣ E ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Burke
150 2.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♠A 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
150 2.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♠A 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Browning
150 2.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♠A 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
400 0.00 6.00 3N W ♦8 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
2 |
♠AKQ85
♥T9
♦J832
♣86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.50 0.50 3N S ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
600 5.50 0.50 3N S ♣2 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Browning
180 4.00 2.00 2N S +2 ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Burke
120 2.50 3.50 2N N ♥3 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
120 2.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♥2 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Gunter-Modest
100 0.50 5.50 3N S -1 ♦5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Keen-Winham
100 0.50 5.50 4♠ N -1 ♣5 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
3 |
♠KT
♥J4
♦AJT7
♣KJ875
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
490 5.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♦2 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
400 2.50 3.50 3N S ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Burke
400 2.50 3.50 3N N ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Keen-Winham
400 2.50 3.50 3N N ♥2 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
400 2.50 3.50 5♣ N ♦8 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 4-Nelson-Browning
150 0.00 6.00 2♦ S +3 ♣2 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
4 |
♠Q52
♥932
♦AQT
♣8654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT4/3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 5♣ E -2 ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
100 5.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♥K 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Winham
600 3.50 2.50 3N E ♥K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
600 3.50 2.50 3N E ♥T 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Nelson-Browning
630 1.00 5.00 3N W +1 ♣4 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Gunter-Modest
630 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
630 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♥T 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Burke
|
5 |
♠AKT7
♥KQ9632
♦-
♣A74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2/3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 1.00 5♥ N +1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
680 5.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
680 5.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♣8 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Nelson-Browning
660 3.00 3.00 3N S +2 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♣2 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Gunter-Modest
630 1.00 5.00 3N S +1 ♦4 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Burke
170 0.00 6.00 2♠ N +2 ♣2 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Winham
|
6 |
♠87
♥9874
♦94
♣QT873
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
120 5.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♠8 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Nelson-Browning
130 3.50 2.50 2♦ E +2 ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.50 2.50 2♦ E +2 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
150 1.00 5.00 1N W +2 ♠7 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Burke
150 1.00 5.00 1N W +2 ♣7 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 3-Keen-Winham
150 1.00 5.00 1N W +2 ♣7 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
7 |
♠863
♥A96
♦A864
♣J53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥K 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 5.00 1.00 2♥ S ♠A 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Nelson-Browning
100 4.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Gunter-Modest
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ E ♦Q 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Winham
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Loops-Burke
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♥K 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
170 0.00 6.00 2♠ E +2 ♦Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
8 |
♠92
♥A8652
♦KJ62
♣82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Gunter-Modest
100 4.50 1.50 2♠ W -2 ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Loops-Burke
100 4.50 1.50 2♠ W -2 ♣8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
50 2.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 ♦2 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Nelson-Browning
50 2.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 ♣8 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Winham
50 1.00 5.00 3♥ N -1 ♠A 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
110 0.00 6.00 2♠ W ♥A 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠AJ8742
♥KT
♦A7
♣654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 2.50 5♠ N ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Gunter-Modest
450 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♠5 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Winham
450 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
450 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥6 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥6 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
450 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥6 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Nelson-Browning
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ N +2 ♥6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Loops-Burke
|
10 |
♠T7
♥AQJ92
♦K7
♣QT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2/3NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
180 5.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♦3 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Winham
130 4.00 2.00 2♣ S +2 ♠A 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Browning
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦9 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 ♠5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Modest
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 ♠5 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 1-Loops-Burke
|
11 |
♠AKJ9
♥AT
♦KT4
♣A752
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 3N N ♦J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Modest
110 5.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦J 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 1-Loops-Burke
100 3.50 2.50 3♥ E -2 ♠Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 2.50 3♦* E -1 ♥A 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Winham
50 2.00 4.00 3♦ W -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Browning
50 1.00 5.00 3♣ N -1 ♦J 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
100 0.00 6.00 3N N -2 ♦J 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
12 |
♠AQ76542
♥963
♦T8
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
150 5.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 ♦T 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
200 3.50 2.50 4♠* N -1 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Modest
200 3.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♣A 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Keen-Winham
420 2.00 4.00 5♦ E +1 ♠3 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 1-Loops-Burke
500 1.00 5.00 4♠* N -2 ♣8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
800 0.00 6.00 5♠* N -3 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Nelson-Browning
|
13 |
♠T63
♥T763
♦J75
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣A 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
200 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣K 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
100 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Browning
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ W +1 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Winham
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ W +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Loops-Burke
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♦7 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
14 |
♠AKJ74
♥63
♦QT3
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 4NT ♦3 ♥4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 6.00 0.00 4♠* N +2 ♣7 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
650 5.00 1.00 5♣* S +1 ♠5 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Loops-Burke
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Browning
480 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 ♣7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
300 2.00 4.00 5♦* E -2 ♠9 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Gunter-Modest
230 0.50 5.50 3♠ N +3 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Winham
230 0.50 5.50 3♠ N +3 ♦A 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠J97
♥87
♦543
♣KQT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 5/3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ W ♣8 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
480 3.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♥7 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Loops-Burke
480 3.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♣K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Nelson-Browning
480 3.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
480 3.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♣K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Keen-Winham
510 1.00 5.00 4♥ W +3 ♣K 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
520 0.00 6.00 3N E +4 ♠3 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
16 |
♠KT84
♥T8
♦A6542
♣K8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♥3 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
490 5.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Gunter-Modest
490 5.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♣6 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Nelson-Browning
460 2.50 3.50 3N S +2 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
460 2.50 3.50 3N S +2 ♥3 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Loops-Burke
430 1.00 5.00 3N N +1 ♥7 3-Harken-Burk vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.00 6.00 5♣ S ♠Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Keen-Winham
|
17 |
♠J3
♥K5
♦QT8652
♣873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 3/4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Keen-Winham
430 5.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣3 3-Harken-Burk vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♦6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Gunter-Modest
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦4 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Nelson-Browning
460 0.50 5.50 3N W +2 ♦6 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Loops-Burke
460 0.50 5.50 3N E +2 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
|
18 |
♠JT2
♥Q8764
♦K943
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 6.00 0.00 2N S ♠5 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Nelson-Browning
90 5.00 1.00 1N S ♠5 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠5 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Loops-Burke
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥5 3-Harken-Burk vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Gunter-Modest
100 2.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
200 0.00 6.00 3N S -2 ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Keen-Winham
|
19 |
♠J9762
♥AJ5
♦AQJ5
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Nelson-Browning
460 5.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Burke
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥9 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Keen-Winham
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♣A 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 5-Gunter-Modest
110 2.00 4.00 2♦ N +1 ♥9 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♥3 3-Harken-Burk vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
|
20 |
♠7543
♥AK73
♦83
♣Q98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.00 0.00 3♦* E -2 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Burke
300 5.00 1.00 3♦ E -3 ♠A 3-Harken-Burk vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
200 3.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♠T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
200 3.00 3.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Nelson-Browning
200 3.00 3.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Keen-Winham
100 1.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 ♦7 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 6.00 4♥ S -2 ♦7 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 5-Gunter-Modest
|
21 |
♠5
♥KQ9864
♦9763
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣5/4 ♦6/5 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.00 0.00 2♠* W -3 ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Nelson-Browning
110 4.50 1.50 2♠ S ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Wilson-Wilson
110 4.50 1.50 2♠ S ♦A 5-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Keen-Winham
50 3.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♠5 6-Cowen-Beiers vs 5-Gunter-Modest
100 2.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♣3 3-Harken-Burk vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
200 1.00 5.00 2♥ N -2 ♦J 7-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
500 0.00 6.00 2♥* N -2 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Burke
|