1 |
♠A652
♥J3
♦K84
♣QJ72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♣5 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gunter-Albright
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ E ♠K 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Zinman-Chase
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♠K 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♠K 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
2 |
♠AQ932
♥95
♦2
♣T7652
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.00 0.00 4♦* S ♦J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ S ♣Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gunter-Albright
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♦2 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 ♠8 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Zinman-Chase
|
3 |
♠KJ5
♥AQJT9
♦A
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N S ♦8 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gunter-Albright
180 2.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♥8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 2.00 1♥ N +2 ♥4 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
110 0.00 3.00 1♥ N +1 ♣A 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Zinman-Chase
|
4 |
♠94
♥QT43
♦AQT8643
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦2 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Zinman-Chase
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N ♥A 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Gunter-Albright
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E ♥2 4-Evenden-Hill vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠AKT93
♥AQ65
♦K8
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♣T 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Evenden-Hill
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♣T 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Chase
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♣T 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 3.00 4♥* N -1 ♣T 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
6 |
♠T7643
♥AK9
♦Q
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥7 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦A 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Chase
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♥7 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♦J 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
7 |
♠KT96
♥A975
♦KJ74
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
110 2.00 1.00 1♠ S +1 ♣Q 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Evenden-Hill
80 1.00 2.00 1♠ S ♣T 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♣Q 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Chase
|
8 |
♠JT7
♥764
♦63
♣AT643
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♠4 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣K 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣6 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Zinman-Chase
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ E +1 ♥A 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
9 |
♠985
♥K3
♦J862
♣KQT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ S +2 ♠2 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ N ♠A 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Chase
100 0.17 2.83 2♠ E -1 ♦4 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
10 |
♠KQJ942
♥-
♦KJ42
♣T87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♦ 2/4♠ -/1NT ♥4 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♥ W -1 ♠K 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠K 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Chase
170 0.17 2.83 3♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
11 |
♠2
♥T
♦JT74
♣KJT9652
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 3♦ S +1 ♠A 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Evenden-Hill
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♥T 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Chase
50 0.17 2.83 4♠ W -1 ♥T 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
|
12 |
♠QT96
♥-
♦976542
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3♥* W -2 ♣A 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Evenden-Hill
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ S +1 ♦T 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
200 0.17 2.83 5♣ S -2 ♦T 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Zinman-Chase
|
13 |
♠AT3
♥52
♦KJ32
♣AK52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠J 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Gunter-Albright
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +2 ♠2 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦4 3-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♣5 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
14 |
♠T8752
♥9
♦95
♣QT874
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5/3 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1♥ S +4 ♦7 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Gunter-Albright
170 2.00 1.00 1♥ S +3 ♦7 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
140 0.50 2.50 1♥ S +2 ♠K 3-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
140 0.50 2.50 1♥ S +2 ♦7 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
15 |
♠K3
♥AQ97642
♦76
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠9 3-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠7 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠7 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Hill
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♠5 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
16 |
♠QT42
♥AKJ5
♦7
♣Q972
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1520 3.00 0.00 7N S ♠3 3-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
1020 2.00 1.00 6N N +1 ♦2 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 1-Gunter-Albright
990 0.50 2.50 6N S ♠9 7-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
990 0.50 2.50 6N N ♠5 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
17 |
♠KJ875
♥QJT
♦62
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.83 0.17 1N W ♠7 3-Zinman-Chase vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
120 1.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♠7 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
430 0.17 2.83 3N W +1 ♥Q 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
|
18 |
♠J9853
♥3
♦5
♣AKQT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ E +1 ♣5 3-Zinman-Chase vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣3 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 ♣3 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
|
19 |
♠Q95
♥T54
♦AKQ83
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.83 0.17 4♠ S +2 ♣J 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦7 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
420 0.17 2.83 4♠ S ♣J 3-Zinman-Chase vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
|
20 |
♠-
♥AQJT3
♦7652
♣Q764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥3/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 2.83 0.17 2♥ N +4 ♣8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
170 0.83 2.17 2♥ N +2 ♣8 3-Zinman-Chase vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
170 0.83 2.17 2♥ N +2 ♣8 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
21 |
♠Q52
♥QJT54
♦A73
♣75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ E ♠7 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
420 0.17 2.83 4♠ W ♣7 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
|
22 |
♠KJT6
♥J
♦AJ5
♣AKQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 2♦ W -3 ♣A 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
150 1.50 1.50 1♣ N +4 ♠A 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
50 0.17 2.83 4♣ N -1 ♦9 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
23 |
♠J2
♥K75
♦Q
♣AQJ9876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♥ 5♠ ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ ♣0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 2.83 0.17 6♥ S +1 ♣2 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
710 0.83 2.17 5♥ S +2 ♦K 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
710 0.83 2.17 4♥ S +3 ♦T 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
24 |
♠QJ963
♥Q64
♦JT
♣JT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦2 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ S ♦8 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♥T 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
150 0.17 2.83 4♦ E +1 ♥A 2-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Nathanson-Forest
|
25 |
♠T5
♥KJ
♦AKQ9
♣AK754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 5♠ S ♥9 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
450 1.50 1.50 5♠ N ♣J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣J 3-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
26 |
♠JT874
♥AT
♦K76
♣753
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.17 0.83 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
650 2.17 0.83 4♠ N +1 ♦4 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.17 2.83 3♠ N +2 ♦6 3-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
27 |
♠AJT
♥76
♦6
♣AKJ9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ 3/4NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ -/1♥ ♣2/3 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 4♣ N ♠K 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♣8 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.17 2.83 3♠ S -2 ♦J 3-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
28 |
♠Q3
♥J973
♦QJ74
♣AJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♣ W -2 ♠Q 3-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
50 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♦4 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Burke-Wesolowski
120 0.17 2.83 2N W ♥3 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|