1 |
♠8654
♥JT5
♦A975
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.50 1.50 4N W +2 ♠4 8-Simon-Loops vs 1-Johnson-Keen
490 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♠4 3-Burke-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
490 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♥J 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 6-Suddards-Pender
490 1.50 1.50 3N E +3 ♠2 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
2 |
♠J
♥764
♦T7
♣AQJT532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ E ♣8 8-Simon-Loops vs 1-Johnson-Keen
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣8 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣8 3-Burke-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
980 0.00 3.00 6♠ E ♥A 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 6-Suddards-Pender
|
3 |
♠JT
♥QT763
♦AJT
♣AT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +3 ♣9 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 6-Suddards-Pender
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♣9 8-Simon-Loops vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♦3 3-Burke-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♠6 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
4 |
♠A986
♥52
♦2
♣T98532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3♦ W -2 ♣T 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 6-Suddards-Pender
100 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♣T 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
90 0.17 2.83 1N E ♦9 3-Burke-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠K73
♥AKT95
♦A7
♣QJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♥3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Johnson-Keen
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠2 3-Burke-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 8-Simon-Loops vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ N +2 ♥3 6-Suddards-Pender vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠93
♥AQT87
♦52
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♥* S -2 ♣A 6-Suddards-Pender vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
650 1.50 1.50 5♠ E ♦A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Johnson-Keen
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣4 8-Simon-Loops vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
680 0.00 3.00 5♠ E +1 ♦A 3-Burke-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
7 |
♠62
♥K9763
♦Q98
♣K75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥6 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥6 3-Burke-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥6 6-Suddards-Pender vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♥6 8-Simon-Loops vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
|
8 |
♠J432
♥J9
♦T7
♣J8765
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦4 3-Burke-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
400 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦T 8-Simon-Loops vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣Q 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Johnson-Keen
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦T 6-Suddards-Pender vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
9 |
♠KQ5
♥QJT982
♦J96
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦A 8-Simon-Loops vs 3-Burke-Loops
200 2.00 1.00 4♣* E -1 ♠A 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 1-Johnson-Keen
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♦A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Suddards-Pender
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♦A 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
|
10 |
♠T82
♥AKQT
♦T974
♣K8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♥7 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
630 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♥4 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Suddards-Pender
630 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♥3 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 1-Johnson-Keen
630 1.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♥3 8-Simon-Loops vs 3-Burke-Loops
|
11 |
♠AKQ986
♥J7
♦5
♣KT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 ♠A 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
100 2.50 0.50 4♦ W -2 ♠T 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Suddards-Pender
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♣6 8-Simon-Loops vs 3-Burke-Loops
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 ♣5 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
12 |
♠85
♥92
♦KJT7
♣A9762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1240 3.00 0.00 2♥** S +1 ♦A 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 1-Johnson-Keen
500 2.00 1.00 2♦* W -3 ♥9 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
150 1.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♣8 8-Simon-Loops vs 3-Burke-Loops
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Suddards-Pender
|
13 |
♠Q9
♥Q753
♦AT932
♣94
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N W +2 ♥3 6-Suddards-Pender vs 3-Burke-Loops
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♦3 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♦3 8-Simon-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
720 0.00 3.00 3N W +4 ♦3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
|
14 |
♠A65
♥T4
♦92
♣QT7432
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥9 6-Suddards-Pender vs 3-Burke-Loops
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥9 1-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥9 8-Simon-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥3 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
15 |
♠6
♥K52
♦A965
♣J9863
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ ♦3/2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W ♠6 1-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦4 6-Suddards-Pender vs 3-Burke-Loops
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦4 8-Simon-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣6 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
16 |
♠J943
♥632
♦AT63
♣43
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ N ♦2 5-Reuben-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ S ♠6 6-Suddards-Pender vs 3-Burke-Loops
50 1.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 ♠K 8-Simon-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -2 ♠A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
|
17 |
♠K6
♥KT83
♦A972
♣T74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♥ 6NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2/1♠ ♣1 ♥0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♦6 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
450 1.50 1.50 5♥ N ♣9 6-Suddards-Pender vs 1-Johnson-Keen
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 8-Simon-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♦4 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 3-Burke-Loops
|
18 |
♠Q32
♥962
♦AK63
♣Q74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥Q 6-Suddards-Pender vs 1-Johnson-Keen
630 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠J 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 3-Burke-Loops
600 1.00 2.00 3N N ♠J 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♠J 8-Simon-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
19 |
♠AJ854
♥J3
♦AK98
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣5 6-Suddards-Pender vs 1-Johnson-Keen
400 1.50 1.50 3N N ♣5 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 3-Burke-Loops
400 1.50 1.50 3N N ♣5 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 8-Simon-Loops vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
20 |
♠J5
♥AKQ984
♦2
♣KJ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.83 0.17 4♥ N +1 ♦K 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦K 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 3-Burke-Loops
200 0.17 2.83 4♠ S -2 ♦A 6-Suddards-Pender vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
21 |
♠96
♥J95
♦KT65
♣QJ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ 2/-NT ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥5/4 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥5 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 3-Burke-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 8-Simon-Loops vs 6-Suddards-Pender
|
22 |
♠AK2
♥J9652
♦654
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 3♥ 1NT ♦7/6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥3 3-Burke-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥K 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♥K 8-Simon-Loops vs 6-Suddards-Pender
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ E ♠Q 1-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
23 |
♠KQ2
♥K8642
♦K965
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦3 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣3 3-Burke-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣3 8-Simon-Loops vs 6-Suddards-Pender
|
24 |
♠QT7
♥KJ953
♦J4
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2/-NT ♣6/5 ♦5 ♠5 NT8/6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♠7 1-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
100 2.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♥5 7-Slinger-Wesolowski vs 2-Henderson-Tainty
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♣2 8-Simon-Loops vs 6-Suddards-Pender
50 0.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♥5 3-Burke-Loops vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
25 |
♠KQT75
♥QJ
♦J96
♣842
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠6 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Burke-Loops
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠6 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 6-Suddards-Pender
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠6 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♣5 8-Simon-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
|
26 |
♠Q2
♥J74
♦T43
♣QJT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 4/3♠ 3/-NT ♣7/6 ♥6/5 NT9/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Burke-Loops
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ W ♥4 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 6-Suddards-Pender
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♥J 8-Simon-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣Q 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
27 |
♠74
♥Q74
♦J4
♣AKJ987
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣A 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 6-Suddards-Pender
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ W ♣A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Burke-Loops
300 1.00 2.00 3♣* N -2 ♥A 8-Simon-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
|
28 |
♠K985
♥JT5
♦AJ6
♣842
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.50 0.50 1N E ♥2 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Reuben-Llacera
90 2.50 0.50 2♣ E ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Burke-Loops
120 0.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♠A 8-Simon-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Wesolowski
120 0.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♥2 2-Henderson-Tainty vs 6-Suddards-Pender
|