1 |
♠KT64
♥K65
♦K2
♣KT82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♦4 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Gamble-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥4 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦3 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Franich-Burk
|
2 |
♠J543
♥5
♦K9
♣AQ9843
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♦2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Franich-Burk
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣2 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
50 0.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♣6 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
3 |
♠A764
♥7
♦K865
♣KQ75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 5♦ N ♥A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
150 0.50 1.50 4♦ S +1 ♠9 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Franich-Burk
150 0.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♠K 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
4 |
♠J5
♥2
♦JT7654
♣K954
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S ♠A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Franich-Burk
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦Q 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
5 |
♠J2
♥9863
♦T93
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦J 6-Martin-Dau vs 7-Franich-Burk
180 1.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♦6 4-Gamble-Loops vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ W -1 ♠J 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
6 |
♠AQT92
♥97
♦Q764
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3/4 ♦6 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♦2 6-Martin-Dau vs 7-Franich-Burk
100 1.00 1.00 3♠* N -1 ♦3 4-Gamble-Loops vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
7 |
♠K5
♥Q97432
♦97
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 3/4♥ ♣3/4 ♦6/7 ♠3/4 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠A 6-Martin-Dau vs 7-Franich-Burk
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠A 4-Gamble-Loops vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
|
8 |
♠AT76
♥9853
♦T8
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N ♦9 4-Gamble-Loops vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♣Q 6-Martin-Dau vs 7-Franich-Burk
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♥A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
9 |
♠A5
♥J5
♦98743
♣T763
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣4/3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ E ♥3 7-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ E ♦A 4-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣5 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
10 |
♠75
♥T9
♦KJ943
♣AQT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♥ 3/2♠ ♣2 ♦5/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S ♥A 7-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
100 1.00 1.00 4♣ E -1 ♥A 4-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -1 ♥A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
11 |
♠J632
♥J42
♦KJ
♣T932
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N W +2 ♠2 7-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
400 1.00 1.00 3N W ♠3 4-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♠2 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
12 |
♠KQJ
♥82
♦T9652
♣K98
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N ♠7 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
150 1.00 1.00 2♣ E +3 ♣7 7-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
300 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 ♣A 4-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
13 |
♠T9432
♥K632
♦-
♣7652
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Gamble-Loops
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
14 |
♠Q6
♥J765432
♦A2
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 5/4♠ 4NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ W +1 ♦A 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ W +2 ♣4 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Gamble-Loops
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥5 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
15 |
♠QT8
♥KQ
♦JT9432
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦J 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦J 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Gamble-Loops
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦J 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
16 |
♠762
♥9
♦9865
♣T9875
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠4/3 NT4/3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥9 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣T 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Gamble-Loops
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣T 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
17 |
♠T9872
♥962
♦A2
♣854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥2/3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ E ♣A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ E ♣A 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣A 7-Franich-Burk vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
18 |
♠KT2
♥875
♦QJT82
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♦3 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♦6 7-Franich-Burk vs 4-Gamble-Loops
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠A 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
|
19 |
♠97
♥9743
♦T985
♣K54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N S -1 ♠2 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ E ♦4 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♦T 7-Franich-Burk vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
20 |
♠KJ
♥92
♦Q9
♣KJT6542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 2♥ ♣3/4 ♦6/7 ♠5/6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♦A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ N ♥4 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ N ♦A 7-Franich-Burk vs 4-Gamble-Loops
|
21 |
♠KQT97
♥53
♦A6
♣AK83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦8 7-Franich-Burk vs 2-Smith-Slinger
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣J 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Loops
200 0.00 2.00 5♠ N -2 ♦8 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
22 |
♠AK
♥542
♦J6432
♣642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N W +1 ♦3 7-Franich-Burk vs 2-Smith-Slinger
630 1.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♥7 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Loops
690 0.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♥7 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
23 |
♠AK7
♥J4
♦AK7
♣AQ642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦Q 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Loops
600 1.00 1.00 5♣ S ♥K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣2 7-Franich-Burk vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
24 |
♠765
♥-
♦K97532
♣KT54
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♠ ♣3 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 6♥ 6NT ♦6 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 5♥ W +1 ♠7 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Martin-Dau
1010 0.50 1.50 6♥ W +1 ♦9 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Loops
1010 0.50 1.50 6♥ W +1 ♦3 7-Franich-Burk vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
25 |
♠Q6543
♥975
♦T32
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N ♣2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣2 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Franich-Burk
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♣K 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
26 |
♠A752
♥92
♦QT96
♣A95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♥4 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♠6 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Franich-Burk
300 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -3 ♣2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
27 |
♠Q8
♥AK976
♦KT9
♣Q85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠K 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Franich-Burk
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♠K 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
|
28 |
♠98742
♥8
♦AQ92
♣KT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥A 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Martin-Dau
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Franich-Burk
|