1 |
♠KQ2
♥Q52
♦QT74
♣K93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♦4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Loops
140 0.00 1.00 3♠ E ♦5 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
2 |
♠AJ9765432
♥-
♦J8
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 1.00 0.00 4♠* N +1 ♣A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Loops
420 0.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
3 |
♠QT9765
♥K5
♦6432
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5/4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♠7 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Loops
690 0.00 1.00 3N W +3 ♠7 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
4 |
♠73
♥A97
♦AKQT3
♣Q53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6/5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Loops
620 0.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
5 |
♠AQ872
♥QJ7
♦Q
♣AQ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 1.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥8 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Loops
150 0.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♥8 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
6 |
♠K852
♥T965
♦Q4
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5/4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠J 5-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Webb-Swetland
170 0.00 1.00 2♥ S +2 ♣8 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
7 |
♠KT63
♥Q763
♦QJ3
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4/3♠ 4/3NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 0.50 0.50 3♠ S ♣A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
140 0.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 5-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
8 |
♠86
♥K5
♦AT97
♣KQJT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.00 0.00 2♣ N ♠J 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
100 0.00 1.00 3N S -2 ♠3 5-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Webb-Swetland
|
9 |
♠J9832
♥54
♦9862
♣75
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 0.00 4♥ E +1 ♦3 5-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Webb-Swetland
1430 0.00 1.00 6♥ E ♠A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
10 |
♠KJ3
♥K85
♦AKQ
♣J752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♦ 2/3♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♠4 NT4/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥2 5-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Webb-Swetland
110 0.00 1.00 2♥ W ♦A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
11 |
♠J
♥Q72
♦A6542
♣A984
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 1.00 0.00 Pass Out 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 1.00 2♥ S -2 ♦9 1-Webb-Swetland vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
12 |
♠QT85
♥T83
♦A62
♣A42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣5 1-Webb-Swetland vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
200 0.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♣T 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠42
♥QJ2
♦32
♣KT5432
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 5/4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 1.00 0.00 1♠ S +5 ♥2 1-Webb-Swetland vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
140 0.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥4 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠T94
♥KQ5
♦T94
♣K982
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♥2 1-Webb-Swetland vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
110 0.00 1.00 3♦ S ♠5 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠8532
♥K
♦AT985
♣A43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣5 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♠5 1-Webb-Swetland vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
16 |
♠KT62
♥Q2
♦J752
♣KT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ -/1♥ ♥6/7 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣A 5-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
140 0.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥A 1-Webb-Swetland vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠AQ5
♥AQT64
♦J7
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦3/4 ♥5/6 ♠5/6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♥7 1-Webb-Swetland vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 1.00 1N E +2 ♥7 5-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
18 |
♠K8654
♥J
♦AJ3
♣QT62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♠7 1-Webb-Swetland vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
120 0.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♠7 5-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
19 |
♠42
♥Q43
♦Q872
♣T943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1/2♦ 2/3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 2N S -3 ♠T 5-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
200 0.00 1.00 2N S -4 ♠8 1-Webb-Swetland vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠AT743
♥AT2
♦85
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.00 0.00 3♦ E +1 ♠5 1-Webb-Swetland vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.00 1.00 3N E ♠5 5-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
21 |
♠J543
♥52
♦52
♣KJT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2/1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠3 2-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♣9 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Davidson-Loops
|
22 |
♠T43
♥A862
♦AK97
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 0.50 0.50 3♠ S ♣A 2-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Davidson-Loops
|
23 |
♠K754
♥T52
♦QT4
♣A62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 0.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♥2 2-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♠6 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Davidson-Loops
|
24 |
♠K94
♥72
♦AQT
♣AJT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠6 2-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 1.00 3♣ N +3 ♠6 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Davidson-Loops
|
25 |
♠A965
♥KJ643
♦Q5
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 ♦6 2-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♥A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Davidson-Loops
|