1 |
♠J52
♥T84
♦9875
♣K75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3/2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠J 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.50 1.50 2N W +1 ♠2 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 8-Webb-Swetland
150 1.50 1.50 3♠ S -3 ♥3 9-Smith-Smith vs 2-Cowen-Loops
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠2 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Loops-Sterling
|
2 |
♠Q
♥T832
♦KQT
♣A8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♦K 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♦K 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Loops-Sterling
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ W ♦K 9-Smith-Smith vs 2-Cowen-Loops
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ W ♣6 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 8-Webb-Swetland
|
3 |
♠Q9742
♥J92
♦AQT3
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Loops
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ W +3 ♠4 8-Webb-Swetland vs 4-Harken-Harken
600 1.00 2.00 3N W ♠4 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 9-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 3.00 5♣ W +1 ♠7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Sterling
|
4 |
♠K9863
♥7
♦AQ2
♣KJ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 3/4♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 2/3NT ♣6/7 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠4 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 9-Smith-Smith
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Loops
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♠4 8-Webb-Swetland vs 4-Harken-Harken
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Sterling
|
5 |
♠6
♥AJT632
♦AQ653
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♦2 2-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣2 8-Webb-Swetland vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
600 1.00 2.00 3N N ♦2 9-Smith-Smith vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♠9 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
6 |
♠Q72
♥53
♦J642
♣KT84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ E ♣A 2-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
230 2.00 1.00 3♠ E +3 ♦5 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♠4 9-Smith-Smith vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥4 8-Webb-Swetland vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
|
7 |
♠J97
♥T9653
♦4
♣KQJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥Q 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 2-Cowen-Loops
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ W -1 ♣K 9-Smith-Smith vs 8-Webb-Swetland
150 1.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♦7 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Harken-Harken
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♦5 3-Loops-Sterling vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠T964
♥97
♦KJT9
♣A72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠4/3 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♦J 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 2-Cowen-Loops
50 2.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♦J 9-Smith-Smith vs 8-Webb-Swetland
120 1.00 2.00 2N W ♣J 3-Loops-Sterling vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣2 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
9 |
♠AJ83
♥A6
♦K3
♣98753
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦3 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 ♠4 8-Webb-Swetland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣6 2-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♥K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Smith-Smith
130 0.50 2.50 2♦ W +2 ♥A 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 3-Loops-Sterling
|
10 |
♠832
♥J5
♦AT754
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 2/3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N W ♣6 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 3-Loops-Sterling
630 1.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♦5 8-Webb-Swetland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 1.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♦4 2-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
660 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠Q42
♥Q965
♦T542
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♠8 2-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ W +1 ♠2 3-Loops-Sterling vs 8-Webb-Swetland
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E +1 ♥J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
400 0.00 3.00 3N W ♥6 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
12 |
♠Q96
♥52
♦JT74
♣Q652
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ E +1 ♠A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 ♥T 2-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
400 1.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 4-Harken-Harken
430 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♥T 3-Loops-Sterling vs 8-Webb-Swetland
|
13 |
♠952
♥AK6
♦A85
♣T983
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♣T 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ W +2 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ W +2 ♥A 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♥A 3-Loops-Sterling vs 2-Cowen-Loops
|
14 |
♠Q43
♥74
♦QT982
♣Q76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
400 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦8 3-Loops-Sterling vs 2-Cowen-Loops
400 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦8 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Smith-Smith
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦T 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠Q862
♥JT72
♦A6
♣A94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♣K 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Sterling
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♣K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣K 2-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Webb-Swetland
600 0.00 3.00 3N S ♣K 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 9-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠AT2
♥A
♦KJ965
♣AT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5/6♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠5 2-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Webb-Swetland
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ N +2 ♠K 7-Osborn-Tidmore vs 9-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♦Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♦Q 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Sterling
|
17 |
♠J93
♥QT64
♦AKQJ
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1/2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦2 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
50 2.00 1.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 8-Webb-Swetland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ S -2 ♥7 3-Loops-Sterling vs 9-Smith-Smith
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥9 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
18 |
♠97643
♥K976
♦53
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ S ♦J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣5 8-Webb-Swetland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♦J 3-Loops-Sterling vs 9-Smith-Smith
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♦J 10-Rodrigues-Stone vs 7-Osborn-Tidmore
|