1 |
♠T542
♥Q96
♦KQ853
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦T 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Harken-Walker
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♠8 10-Slinger-Miller vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♠6 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♦6 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Smith
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♠6 6-Stone-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
|
2 |
♠AJ8743
♥2
♦KQ74
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♦* W -3 ♠A 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♦T 6-Stone-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +2 ♣A 10-Slinger-Miller vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣A 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Harken-Walker
50 0.00 4.00 4♦ W -1 ♥2 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Smith
|
3 |
♠J
♥QJ8653
♦A4
♣KT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Stone-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣2 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Harken-Walker
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♠T 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Smith
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♦2 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ N +1 ♦3 10-Slinger-Miller vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
|
4 |
♠K96542
♥T6
♦A76
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♦3 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥A 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Stone-Llacera
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♦J 10-Slinger-Miller vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♣3 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Walker
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♥A 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Smith
|
5 |
♠AQ9862
♥A
♦A863
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +3 ♥K 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦J 10-Slinger-Miller vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣3 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Stone-Llacera
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +3 ♠7 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +2 ♦3 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Walker
|
6 |
♠AQT2
♥A4
♦QT9
♣K732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 ♣2 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Walker
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♥A 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♠5 10-Slinger-Miller vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♠5 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Stone-Llacera
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♠5 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
|
7 |
♠54
♥JT9532
♦Q73
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2/-NT ♥6 ♠6 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥4 10-Slinger-Miller vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ W ♠5 2-Loops-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♠8 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♦A 6-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Walker
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♦A 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
|
8 |
♠QJ64
♥AQ8
♦J9
♣9873
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦T 10-Slinger-Miller vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦K 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦4 2-Loops-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
400 1.00 3.00 5♣ S ♦3 6-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Walker
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S +1 ♦3 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
|
9 |
♠65
♥AKJ4
♦T96
♣T764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N W +2 ♥A 2-Loops-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
180 3.00 1.00 2N W +2 ♠6 10-Slinger-Miller vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠6 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠6 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠6 6-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Walker
|
10 |
♠KJ7
♥T952
♦J92
♣J96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♥2 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
200 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♥2 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
200 3.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♥2 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
100 0.50 3.50 3N W -1 ♥T 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Stone-Llacera
100 0.50 3.50 3N W -1 ♥2 10-Slinger-Miller vs 2-Loops-Smith
|
11 |
♠AK6
♥AK96
♦T94
♣J96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♠A 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦T 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Stone-Llacera
50 1.50 2.50 1N W -1 ♥6 10-Slinger-Miller vs 2-Loops-Smith
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♦T 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
90 0.00 4.00 1N W ♥A 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
|
12 |
♠AK97
♥A9872
♦65
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 5/4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♣6 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Stone-Llacera
690 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♣6 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠Q 3-Harken-Walker vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠3 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
630 0.00 4.00 3N N +1 ♣6 10-Slinger-Miller vs 2-Loops-Smith
|
13 |
♠QT973
♥AT3
♦KT76
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥K 10-Slinger-Miller vs 3-Harken-Walker
120 2.00 2.00 2N E ♥6 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥K 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥6 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 6-Stone-Llacera
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♣4 2-Loops-Smith vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
|
14 |
♠A53
♥KJ762
♦63
♣JT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6/5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♦6 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
120 3.00 1.00 2N N ♥8 10-Slinger-Miller vs 3-Harken-Walker
100 2.00 2.00 2♥* W -1 ♦6 2-Loops-Smith vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ W ♦6 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 6-Stone-Llacera
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ W ♦6 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
|
15 |
♠QT9852
♥T85
♦3
♣T42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ E +1 ♦3 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♦3 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♦3 2-Loops-Smith vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♦3 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 6-Stone-Llacera
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♦3 10-Slinger-Miller vs 3-Harken-Walker
|
16 |
♠A7
♥AK982
♦K9
♣K963
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠6 2-Loops-Smith vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
200 3.00 1.00 3♠* W -1 ♥A 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♠K 3-Harken-Walker vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♠6 10-Slinger-Miller vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠6 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Stone-Llacera
|
17 |
♠Q32
♥AKJ5
♦K3
♣Q832
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥3 3-Harken-Walker vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
490 3.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥3 10-Slinger-Miller vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ N +3 ♥T 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Stone-Llacera
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♠6 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠6 2-Loops-Smith vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
18 |
♠72
♥J743
♦Q7
♣K8752
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3/2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♦A 3-Harken-Walker vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦A 10-Slinger-Miller vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 ♦A 2-Loops-Smith vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 ♠7 9-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Stone-Llacera
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♦A 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
|
19 |
♠8
♥AJ74
♦AT8432
♣J2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠A 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Loops-Smith
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♠4 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♣K 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
120 1.00 3.00 2N W ♦4 6-Stone-Llacera vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 ♦4 10-Slinger-Miller vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
|
20 |
♠873
♥QT93
♦J982
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4/3♦ 2/1♥ 2/1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N S -1 ♠4 10-Slinger-Miller vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♠4 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♠T 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Loops-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♠4 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♠4 6-Stone-Llacera vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
|
21 |
♠K85
♥QT76
♦963
♣T96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦4/5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♣A 10-Slinger-Miller vs 5-Wesolowski-Davidson
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♣A 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♣A 6-Stone-Llacera vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♣2 3-Harken-Walker vs 2-Loops-Smith
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♣Q 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
|
22 |
♠K62
♥62
♦AT8764
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥7 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♥5 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♥3 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 3-Harken-Walker
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 ♥3 2-Loops-Smith vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♦A 10-Slinger-Miller vs 6-Stone-Llacera
|
23 |
♠AKQ7
♥K8
♦72
♣KJ976
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 4.00 0.00 3♣* S ♠4 10-Slinger-Miller vs 6-Stone-Llacera
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ S +1 ♦J 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♠4 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 3-Harken-Walker
90 1.00 3.00 1N N ♥Q 2-Loops-Smith vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥5 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
|
24 |
♠K73
♥T84
♦A7643
♣32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ W ♥5 7-Gamble-Henderson vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ W ♥4 2-Loops-Smith vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦4 4-Schilling-Pelc vs 3-Harken-Walker
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦4 10-Slinger-Miller vs 6-Stone-Llacera
|
25 |
♠T95
♥3
♦AKQT65
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♦2 3-Harken-Walker vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♠K 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♦2 10-Slinger-Miller vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♠K 6-Stone-Llacera vs 2-Loops-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♦8 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
26 |
♠J6
♥Q5
♦T9532
♣JT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 6/5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ E ♦6 3-Harken-Walker vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠6 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♦6 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♦5 6-Stone-Llacera vs 2-Loops-Smith
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♦6 10-Slinger-Miller vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
|
27 |
♠9632
♥653
♦K64
♣K82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥7 10-Slinger-Miller vs 7-Gamble-Henderson
100 2.50 1.50 1N S -2 ♥2 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -2 ♦A 5-Wesolowski-Davidson vs 4-Schilling-Pelc
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦4 3-Harken-Walker vs 9-Tainty-Tainty
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♦4 6-Stone-Llacera vs 2-Loops-Smith
|