1 |
♠62
♥QT9875
♦A93
♣J2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 5♥* N ♠A 3-Modest-Pender vs 5-Davidson-Downing
650 1.50 0.50 5♥* N ♠A 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.00 2.00 5♥ N ♠A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
|
2 |
♠AK9632
♥62
♦9
♣JT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 2.00 0.00 4♠* S ♥A 3-Modest-Pender vs 5-Davidson-Downing
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♥9 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣A 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
3 |
♠K
♥J98742
♦Q83
♣T92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1/-♥ ♣7/6 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥7 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
600 1.00 1.00 3N W ♠K 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
630 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥9 3-Modest-Pender vs 5-Davidson-Downing
|
4 |
♠JT95
♥982
♦QJ3
♣T52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2/3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠J 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠J 3-Modest-Pender vs 5-Davidson-Downing
|
5 |
♠3
♥QJ2
♦K8653
♣T932
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5/4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♠3 3-Modest-Pender vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
150 1.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♠3 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♥Q 5-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
6 |
♠T93
♥JT642
♦KJ9
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣5 3-Modest-Pender vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
210 1.00 1.00 2N W +3 ♣5 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥5 5-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠T65
♥JT
♦T853
♣A762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦A 3-Modest-Pender vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ E ♠A 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
500 0.00 2.00 4♠* S -2 ♦A 5-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
8 |
♠6
♥875
♦A98432
♣K87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 5♠ W ♣7 3-Modest-Pender vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♠6 5-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♠6 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠T
♥KT9853
♦QJT98
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥8 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 5-Davidson-Downing
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
690 0.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♦Q 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Modest-Pender
|
10 |
♠K9
♥T9
♦Q7542
♣8754
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣8 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 5-Davidson-Downing
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W ♦7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦4 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Modest-Pender
|
11 |
♠752
♥52
♦J75
♣QJ432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 7♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.00 0.00 4♥ W +3 ♣Q 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Modest-Pender
980 1.00 1.00 6♠ W ♣Q 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 5-Davidson-Downing
1010 0.00 2.00 6♥ W +1 ♣Q 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
12 |
♠A62
♥Q7654
♦64
♣A42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♥5 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Modest-Pender
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♥T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♥T 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 5-Davidson-Downing
|
13 |
♠T732
♥T962
♦K62
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♥6 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Pender
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♥2 5-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♦2 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
|
14 |
♠J9
♥KQ86
♦KT653
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♥J 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Pender
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E ♦9 5-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣2 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠Q9652
♥K9
♦6
♣J8732
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♠J 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♦7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Pender
480 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠J 5-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠9752
♥AJ76
♦A5
♣632
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N E ♥4 5-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
600 1.50 0.50 3N E ♣4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Pender
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥6 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg
|
17 |
♠Q8732
♥632
♦KT4
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ E +2 ♠9 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Downing
170 1.50 0.50 1♥ E +3 ♠9 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠9 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Modest-Pender
|
18 |
♠T63
♥KQT75
♦AT
♣A65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3/4 ♥3/4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Modest-Pender
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♣Q 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♣Q 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Downing
|
19 |
♠2
♥764
♦A985
♣KQJ97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ E ♠A 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
300 0.50 1.50 4♠* S -2 ♥A 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Downing
300 0.50 1.50 3♠* S -2 ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Modest-Pender
|
20 |
♠KT4
♥AK843
♦62
♣964
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♥A 4-Nathanson-Avenmarg vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♥A 6-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Downing
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Modest-Pender
|