1 |
♠KQ6
♥QJ765
♦4
♣AT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♠* E -1 ♦K 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
300 2.00 1.00 4♥* N -2 ♠A 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥2 5-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♥T 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
2 |
♠AKT8
♥A63
♦63
♣8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠8 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
150 2.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 ♠A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
400 1.00 2.00 5♦ E ♣8 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣8 5-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
3 |
♠KT7
♥A2
♦A75
♣KQJ95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 2/1♦ 3♠ 5/2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N S ♥K 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♥3 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥3 5-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥3 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
4 |
♠86
♥A9652
♦Q5
♣Q874
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +3 ♠4 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Johnson
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♣A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W ♦Q 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
140 0.00 3.00 1♠ W +2 ♦5 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
5 |
♠652
♥QJ85
♦AK32
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♦6 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠Q 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♦7 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠Q 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Johnson
|
6 |
♠QT9
♥A65
♦854
♣QT84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N N ♥7 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
100 1.50 1.50 1N N -2 ♥7 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
100 1.50 1.50 1N N -2 ♥5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Johnson
|
7 |
♠Q92
♥AK72
♦3
♣J9876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 ♣7 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
90 2.00 1.00 1N N ♥A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦J 5-Loops-Johnson vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
120 0.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♥A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
8 |
♠J3
♥AK6
♦A94
♣AQT76
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦2 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠4 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣2 5-Loops-Johnson vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
400 0.00 3.00 3N N ♠4 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
9 |
♠A8543
♥JT
♦T7632
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +3 ♥3 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♠2 5-Loops-Johnson vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥7 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
10 |
♠K84
♥J98754
♦Q83
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 7♥ W -1 ♥7 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♥9 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
630 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
660 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣3 5-Loops-Johnson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
|
11 |
♠AQ9
♥QJT95
♦95
♣AK6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 2/1♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♣4 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠T 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠2 5-Loops-Johnson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠2 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
12 |
♠KT43
♥KQ
♦K97
♣J643
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦Q 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣2 5-Loops-Johnson vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣2 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♣2 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
|
13 |
♠J2
♥AQT6
♦Q42
♣AQ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Loops-Johnson
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠3 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♣5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
300 0.00 3.00 2N N -3 ♠3 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
14 |
♠7
♥KJ4
♦J86
♣AQJ874
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4/3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 5♣ N ♠T 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠T 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
50 0.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♠T 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Loops-Johnson
50 0.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♦4 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠4
♥Q654
♦AK53
♣9863
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦7/6 ♠6/5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N N ♦2 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Loops-Johnson
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦A 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦A 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W ♦3 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
16 |
♠AJ982
♥QT64
♦J2
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Loops-Johnson
150 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -3 ♥A 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
150 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -3 ♥A 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
150 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -3 ♥A 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
|
17 |
♠-
♥AT95
♦KQ9643
♣A75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6/7 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠2 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
150 1.50 1.50 4♦ N +1 ♣T 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♠3 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Loops-Johnson
100 0.00 3.00 4♣* S -1 ♠2 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
18 |
♠AT97643
♥T
♦K92
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦7 7-Slinger-Formoso vs 2-Pulliam-Pringle
50 1.50 1.50 5♥ W -1 ♠5 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠5 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Loops-Johnson
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠5 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
19 |
♠KT863
♥-
♦AK632
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦4/5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♦J 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Johnson
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦J 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -1 ♦J 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♦A 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
20 |
♠965
♥K76
♦Q9
♣J9873
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 1/-♥ 6♠ 5NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 ♥5 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Johnson
680 1.50 1.50 5♠ W +1 ♣7 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +2 ♠5 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
1460 0.00 3.00 6♠ W +1 ♥6 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
|
21 |
♠Q8653
♥62
♦743
♣842
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Johnson
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♦5 2-Pulliam-Pringle vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ E +2 ♠A 1-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ E +2 ♥J 8-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 7-Slinger-Formoso
|