1 |
♠K432
♥AK7
♦Q94
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Kremers-Downing
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ S ♦J 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ S ♦8 8-Loops-Loops vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
2 |
♠42
♥A32
♦K832
♣T843
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3/2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N W +2 ♦2 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
180 1.00 1.00 1N E +3 ♥5 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Kremers-Downing
400 0.00 2.00 3N E ♥5 8-Loops-Loops vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
3 |
♠4
♥AKT8532
♦T83
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♥A 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Kremers-Downing
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥Q 8-Loops-Loops vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
4 |
♠K7654
♥J862
♦6
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♣2 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 5-Barr-Barr
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
660 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
5 |
♠J752
♥983
♦852
♣J42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥3 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 5-Barr-Barr
490 1.00 1.00 3N E +3 ♥6 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
990 0.00 2.00 6N E ♥A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
6 |
♠QJ5
♥952
♦KT
♣KQT96
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ W ♠Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♣K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♣9 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 5-Barr-Barr
|
7 |
♠AT98
♥K6
♦KQ62
♣T92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 ♣2 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 1-Harken-Tainty
120 1.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♦2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Kremers-Downing
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♦7 8-Loops-Loops vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
|
8 |
♠K52
♥AQ
♦AT63
♣K954
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N W -3 ♣4 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 1-Harken-Tainty
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♥7 8-Loops-Loops vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
180 0.00 2.00 1N* W ♦3 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
9 |
♠K743
♥86
♦QT8642
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ E ♦J 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 1.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 ♦6 8-Loops-Loops vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
260 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +5 ♣9 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
10 |
♠A4
♥AQ64
♦4
♣AJT743
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♣6/7 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 ♠9 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ S -2 ♥J 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
300 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♥T 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
|
11 |
♠A743
♥QJ6
♦Q62
♣T76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2/1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦2 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣K 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
|
12 |
♠QT5
♥AKJ84
♦J8
♣K76
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N ♣T 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ N ♦T 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦T 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
|
13 |
♠AKJ6
♥932
♦K9
♣T654
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠6 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
100 1.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♠6 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 8-Loops-Loops vs 5-Barr-Barr
|
14 |
♠AT763
♥K9763
♦K9
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 2.00 0.00 5♦* E -5 ♣T 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ S +1 ♥A 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ S +1 ♦2 8-Loops-Loops vs 5-Barr-Barr
|
15 |
♠JT63
♥JT7
♦QJ52
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♠2 8-Loops-Loops vs 5-Barr-Barr
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♣T 7-Formoso-McGraw vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
180 0.00 2.00 2N E +2 ♣5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
16 |
♠AJ8763
♥T9
♦Q8
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +2 ♦7 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Barr-Barr
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♥2 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦7 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
17 |
♠-
♥KJT972
♦K3
♣T9875
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 5NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♣* W -1 ♥J 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Barr-Barr
100 1.00 1.00 4♠* S -1 ♣A 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
150 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -3 ♣A 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
18 |
♠AKJ86
♥JT2
♦T8
♣T87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦6/5 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♠A 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♦T 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Barr-Barr
120 0.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♠8 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
19 |
♠K3
♥KJ94
♦AQ
♣KT974
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.50 0.50 2N N +2 ♦9 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
180 1.50 0.50 1N N +3 ♥2 8-Loops-Loops vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ N ♥2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Barr-Barr
|
20 |
♠Q952
♥K63
♦AK983
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♣8 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♠4 8-Loops-Loops vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Barr-Barr
|
21 |
♠KJT874
♥93
♦T5
♣A87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 2.00 0.00 2♠* N ♣5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Barr-Barr
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ N ♣6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Morrissey-Rodrigues
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♥J 8-Loops-Loops vs 7-Formoso-McGraw
|