1 |
♠Q864
♥9876
♦T6
♣QT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♦5 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♦5 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
50 3.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♣4 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♦5 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 11-Kremers-Downing
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♦5 12-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Harken-Tainty
430 0.00 5.00 3N W +1 ♥6 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠92
♥AQ952
♦KT
♣Q986
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♣ 5/6♥ 2/6NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠8 12-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Harken-Tainty
620 4.00 1.00 5♣ S +1 ♠K 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
230 3.00 2.00 2♥ N +4 ♦A 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
170 2.00 3.00 3♣ S +3 ♠K 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
100 0.50 4.50 4♠* E -1 ♣A 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
100 0.50 4.50 4♦ W -2 ♣6 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 11-Kremers-Downing
|
3 |
♠654
♥AJ73
♦9
♣98732
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦9 12-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
100 3.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♣2 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
100 3.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♣3 11-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦9 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
120 1.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♣9 1-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
600 0.00 5.00 3N W ♥7 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
|
4 |
♠93
♥KT7
♦QT7
♣AKJ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ E ♣5 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
110 3.50 1.50 1♠ E +1 ♣5 12-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ E ♣5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ E ♣5 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣5 11-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
|
5 |
♠Q83
♥J8752
♦86
♣985
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣J 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
50 3.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♣A 12-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
50 3.50 1.50 3♣ E -1 ♦A 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
100 2.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦3 1-Harken-Tainty vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
150 1.00 4.00 2N E +1 ♦Q 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
400 0.00 5.00 3N S -4 ♦4 11-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
|
6 |
♠J6
♥AT
♦Q92
♣AQ9752
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
50 4.00 1.00 5♣ N -1 ♠5 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
100 2.50 2.50 5♣ N -2 ♠5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
100 2.50 2.50 5♣ N -2 ♠5 12-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ W +3 ♦2 11-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♥A 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
|
7 |
♠J6
♥J94
♦AK4
♣AJT76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 1/-♦ 6/5♥ 2♠ 6/5NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 5.00 0.00 6♥ S ♣2 12-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
680 3.00 2.00 5♥ S +1 ♣2 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
680 3.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♣2 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 1-Harken-Tainty
680 3.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♣2 11-Kremers-Downing vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
660 1.00 4.00 3N N +2 ♦Q 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.00 5.00 5♥ S ♣2 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
|
8 |
♠9852
♥J4
♦A62
♣K975
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♥J 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
110 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +1 ♥J 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
110 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +1 ♥5 11-Kremers-Downing vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
120 2.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♥5 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.00 4.00 2♦ W +2 ♥J 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 1-Harken-Tainty
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 12-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
|
9 |
♠KJ4
♥AJ865
♦Q3
♣K97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.50 0.50 2♦ S ♠3 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
90 4.50 0.50 2♣ N ♠9 12-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
50 2.50 2.50 2N S -1 ♠7 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Kremers-Downing
50 2.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♠Q 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
80 1.00 4.00 1♠ E ♥4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
100 0.00 5.00 2♥ N -2 ♦J 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
|
10 |
♠KT873
♥AKQJ8
♦K42
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3/4♠ 1/2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♦ ♥3/4 ♠3/4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦3 12-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Kremers-Downing
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 9-Gumz-Emanuel vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♦A 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ N +1 ♠Q 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
|
11 |
♠964
♥J9876532
♦-
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: -/1♣ 4♦ -/1♠ 3NT ♣6/7 ♥4 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -1 ♥5 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 11-Kremers-Downing
50 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -1 ♣T 12-Allen-Formoso vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
100 3.00 2.00 4♥* N -1 ♦A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
130 2.00 3.00 4♦ W ♠6 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
300 1.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 ♥A 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
400 0.00 5.00 3N E ♣A 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
|
12 |
♠98
♥AT852
♦7
♣QJ842
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦K 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦6 12-Allen-Formoso vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
150 2.50 2.50 2♠ E -3 ♣A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♦A 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ N ♦K 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 11-Kremers-Downing
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ W ♣Q 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
|
13 |
♠97632
♥K2
♦96
♣9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦7 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 3.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♥3 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
100 3.50 1.50 1♦ E -1 ♠J 11-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
70 2.00 3.00 1♦ E ♠J 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
100 1.00 4.00 2♦ S -1 ♥9 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
150 0.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♦7 12-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
14 |
♠KT65
♥T8
♦AT9
♣KQJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣K 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Harken-Tainty
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ W ♣K 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♦2 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 11-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♣9 12-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠KQ852
♥AK6
♦QJ7
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♠J 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
50 4.00 1.00 2♣ E -1 ♦5 11-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Harken-Tainty
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ E ♥2 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣K 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
150 1.00 4.00 2♣ E +3 ♠J 12-Allen-Formoso vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
200 0.00 5.00 2N N -2 ♦A 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
|
16 |
♠QT
♥T2
♦KJ842
♣T765
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♦2 6-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Cowen-Hahn
100 4.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♣J 12-Allen-Formoso vs 8-Tidmore-Osborn
100 4.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♠3 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Nelson-Hartmann
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ W ♥T 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
90 1.00 4.00 2♣ W ♦4 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
150 0.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♠3 11-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
17 |
♠J42
♥KT
♦J972
♣KJ95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♦A 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 1-Harken-Tainty
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ S ♦A 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 11-Kremers-Downing
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ S ♦A 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ S ♦A 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ S ♦A 12-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
|
18 |
♠Q952
♥AJ
♦J93
♣T873
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♥8 7-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Ruggeri-Hemrick
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♥3 8-Tidmore-Osborn vs 6-O'Neill-Smart
50 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♥3 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 1-Harken-Tainty
50 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♥3 12-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Gumz-Emanuel
120 0.50 4.50 2N E ♥3 2-Cowen-Hahn vs 11-Kremers-Downing
120 0.50 4.50 2N E ♥3 5-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
|