1 |
♠KQT3
♥J2
♦KQ9863
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.80 1.80 4♠ S ♥T 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 2-Loops-Davidson
420 1.80 1.80 4♠ S ♣A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠AT753
♥K75
♦83
♣J63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.95 1.65 3N S ♦6 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 2-Loops-Davidson
200 1.65 1.95 4♠ N -2 ♦Q 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
3 |
♠K975
♥A85
♦7643
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.80 1.80 4♦ S ♣T 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.80 1.80 2♦ S +2 ♥4 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 2-Loops-Davidson
|
4 |
♠-
♥8742
♦A9743
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.17 0.83 5♦ N +1 ♠A 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
620 2.17 0.83 5♦ N +1 ♥6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Downing
100 0.17 2.83 3N S -1 ♠2 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Davidson
|
5 |
♠85432
♥Q5
♦KJ72
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 3N W -2 ♥Q 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Davidson
100 2.17 0.83 4♦ E -2 ♥A 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
430 0.17 2.83 3N W +1 ♥Q 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Downing
|
6 |
♠AJ642
♥T9
♦763
♣J84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 5♦ W -1 ♥9 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♠5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Downing
600 0.17 2.83 3N W ♠4 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Davidson
|
7 |
♠75
♥A765
♦A95
♣QT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.80 1.80 3♠ E ♣6 10-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
140 1.80 1.80 1♠ E +2 ♣6 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
8 |
♠KQT732
♥AKJ7
♦-
♣653
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5/6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.80 1.80 4♠ N +1 ♦K 10-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
450 1.80 1.80 4♠ N +1 ♦9 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
9 |
♠4
♥J95
♦AKQT94
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.95 1.65 1N S +2 ♠J 10-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
130 1.65 1.95 4♦ N ♦5 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
10 |
♠KQJ753
♥K72
♦-
♣9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦1 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 5♦ W ♣A 10-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Davidson
620 1.50 1.50 5♦ E +1 ♣A 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
750 0.17 2.83 5♦* E ♣A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Downing
|
11 |
♠K87
♥T432
♦QJ98
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♥ N ♠3 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.83 2.17 2♥ S -1 ♦5 10-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Davidson
50 0.83 2.17 2♥ N -1 ♦T 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Downing
|
12 |
♠JT4
♥AQT
♦K6
♣J9852
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.17 0.83 2♠ W +2 ♣9 9-Kobland-Nathanson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.17 0.83 2♠ E +2 ♣J 10-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Davidson
450 0.17 2.83 4♠ W +1 ♦6 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Downing
|
13 |
♠T6
♥-
♦AK975432
♣Q62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3NT ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 4♥ 3♠ ♦3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♦ N +1 ♥Q 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♠7 2-Loops-Davidson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 ♣A 10-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦J 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
|
14 |
♠62
♥T87
♦AQ854
♣QT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♠Q 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠6 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♣5 2-Loops-Davidson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
300 0.00 3.00 1♠* S -2 ♥A 10-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠AJ74
♥K7
♦A93
♣J974
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♠ W -2 ♥K 2-Loops-Davidson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
90 1.50 1.50 1N S ♦5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
120 0.17 2.83 1N E +1 ♥5 10-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠QJ96
♥KQJ93
♦9
♣J94
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♣3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♠K 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ N ♠K 10-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Winham-Downing
150 0.00 3.00 2♦ N -3 ♣3 2-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
|
17 |
♠K984
♥J943
♦A
♣KQJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠7 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♦5 2-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
170 0.50 2.50 2♥ S +2 ♠7 10-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Winham-Downing
170 0.50 2.50 2♥ S +2 ♣A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
18 |
♠K32
♥KQ62
♦9754
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 4NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠Q 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 1.00 4♠* W -1 ♥K 10-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Winham-Downing
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣4 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 0.00 3.00 5♥ S -2 ♠Q 2-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
|
19 |
♠J732
♥87
♦AT4
♣KJ93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ E ♥3 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ W +1 ♠7 4-Winham-Downing vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ W +1 ♠2 10-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♦A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Loops-Davidson
|
20 |
♠8
♥65
♦AQT97
♣AJT54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 3/4♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 5♠ E -2 ♣3 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦2 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Loops-Davidson
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦2 4-Winham-Downing vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E ♦8 10-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
21 |
♠974
♥T632
♦AJ74
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 ♥A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Loops-Davidson
170 2.00 1.00 4♣ E +2 ♥A 4-Winham-Downing vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -2 ♠K 10-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
300 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♣6 1-Xu-Ruggeri vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
22 |
♠AKQ8742
♥6
♦T62
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ E ♠J 4-Winham-Downing vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.83 2.17 4♥ E +1 ♠J 2-Loops-Davidson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.83 2.17 4♥ E +1 ♠J 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
|
23 |
♠QJ75
♥T8764
♦9
♣QT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.83 0.17 2♦ S ♥K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ E ♦9 2-Loops-Davidson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.17 2.83 3♠ E ♥3 4-Winham-Downing vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
24 |
♠Q952
♥AT62
♦64
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 2♥ N ♠K 4-Winham-Downing vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.17 0.83 1♥ N +1 ♠A 2-Loops-Davidson vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.17 2.83 2♥ N -1 ♠A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Kobland-Nathanson
|
25 |
♠32
♥AQT942
♦AQ6
♣94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♥3 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Winham-Downing
200 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♥3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
200 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♥3 10-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
26 |
♠JT8
♥98
♦KQJT7
♣AK4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.17 0.83 2N N +2 ♥2 10-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
180 2.17 0.83 1N N +3 ♣7 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Winham-Downing
110 0.17 2.83 2♦ N +1 ♣7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
|
27 |
♠QJ2
♥9854
♦JT5
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ N ♦A 10-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♦A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Winham-Downing
130 0.17 2.83 4♦ E ♦4 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Ruggeri
|