1 |
♠K
♥AQ654
♦AJ
♣AKJT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 6♥ 2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥1 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 4♠* E -3 ♦K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
490 4.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♠5 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
480 2.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♣Q 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
480 2.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♣Q 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
480 2.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♣Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
450 0.00 5.00 4♥ N +1 ♣Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
2 |
♠T8743
♥65
♦J32
♣J86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣7 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
460 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♦9 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Tainty
480 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +2 ♠6 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
|
3 |
♠J
♥QJT65
♦AT7
♣AKJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 5♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ E +1 ♥K 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ E +1 ♥2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
230 3.00 2.00 3♠ E +3 ♥K 7-Harken-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ W ♥K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Tainty
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♥2 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
|
4 |
♠KJT83
♥74
♦72
♣KT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 5.00 0.00 1N S +4 ♥Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
200 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +3 ♥A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
200 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +3 ♥Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ N ♦A 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
140 1.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♦K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ S -1 ♣8 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
5 |
♠Q652
♥Q652
♦K63
♣A9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠4 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
50 4.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠2 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
PASS 3.00 2.00 Pass Out 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
120 1.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♥7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Harken-Tainty
130 0.00 5.00 3♣ E +1 ♠8 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
6 |
♠AJ2
♥764
♦Q76
♣JT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 5.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♠5 7-Harken-Winham vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
150 4.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♥T 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
130 3.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 ♠T 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♥5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
90 1.00 4.00 2♦ S ♣K 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
50 0.00 5.00 4♦ S -1 ♠6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
7 |
♠K3
♥AT962
♦97
♣J873
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
200 3.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♦A 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Tainty
300 2.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♦A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
|
8 |
♠9654
♥-
♦KQ9632
♣A62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N S ♥4 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Tainty
130 4.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 ♣T 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
110 3.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♣3 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 2.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 ♣4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ W ♦K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ E ♦A 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
9 |
♠K5
♥J72
♦KQ643
♣Q98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 2♦ N +2 ♥6 7-Harken-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
100 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦J 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Tainty
50 3.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ E ♦J 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
150 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 ♥4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
250 0.00 5.00 2N S -5 ♥T 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
|
10 |
♠AQ985
♥Q6
♦Q3
♣J962
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♠8 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
90 4.00 1.00 1N S ♥5 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
100 1.50 3.50 1N S -1 ♠2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
100 1.50 3.50 4♦ S -1 ♣3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 ♠2 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
100 1.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 ♠2 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
11 |
♠AKJ
♥Q65
♦AQT96
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3/5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.00 0.00 1♦ N +1 ♣K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
50 3.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 ♠A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
50 3.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 ♠A 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣7 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
150 0.00 5.00 3♦ N -3 ♣7 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
12 |
♠K74
♥AK82
♦Q93
♣J62
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥Q 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥Q 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
400 0.00 5.00 4♣ N -4 ♥5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
13 |
♠QJ
♥AT9852
♦T9
♣JT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦4/3 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣6 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♣2 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♣K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ N ♣4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 ♣K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
100 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -1 ♣6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
|
14 |
♠AK3
♥QJ63
♦75
♣T975
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 5.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♠5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
400 4.00 1.00 3N N ♥5 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
170 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +3 ♠5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
170 2.50 2.50 2♣ S +4 ♠5 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
150 0.50 4.50 4♦ S +1 ♥A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
150 0.50 4.50 4♦ S +1 ♥7 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
15 |
♠J4
♥43
♦QJ96
♣AK976
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
110 3.50 1.50 2♣ N +1 ♣Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
90 2.00 3.00 1N E ♠3 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
100 1.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♥5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
120 0.00 5.00 1N E +1 ♠T 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
16 |
♠KQ9832
♥A97
♦85
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
420 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♥Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ N +2 ♥Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♥Q 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
|
17 |
♠K9754
♥74
♦986
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦A 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♦A 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
420 0.00 5.00 4♥ E ♦A 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
|
18 |
♠KQT9
♥AJ64
♦AJ63
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 ♣K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
680 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 ♣K 7-Harken-Winham vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣K 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ S ♣K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
19 |
♠-
♥JT65
♦AKQT76
♣KT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦1/2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠6 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
450 4.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
430 2.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♠6 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Harken-Tainty
430 2.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♠6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
430 2.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♥4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
50 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♠6 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
20 |
♠KJ84
♥QJ
♦A987
♣AK7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♠2 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
100 3.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♦5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
100 3.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♦4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
100 3.50 1.50 1♠ N -1 ♣T 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ W ♣A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
400 0.00 5.00 1♦ N -4 ♣T 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
21 |
♠AQJT52
♥KJ4
♦4
♣K73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ -/1♥ 1NT ♥6/7 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♣A 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Harken-Tainty
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ N ♦3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
50 2.50 2.50 4♦ W -1 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
50 2.50 2.50 4♦ W -1 ♥4 6-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Cowen-Hahn
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ W ♠A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
130 0.00 5.00 3♦ E +1 ♠8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|