1 |
♠865
♥QJ953
♦AT3
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♥ N +3 ♦4 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ N ♦4 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
50 0.75 3.25 4♥ N -1 ♦4 6-Formoso-Allen vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
50 0.75 3.25 4♥ N -1 ♦4 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
|
2 |
♠J74
♥KJT6
♦AK94
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.63 1.38 3♠ E +2 ♠8 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
200 2.63 1.38 2♠ E +3 ♦2 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
200 2.63 1.38 1♠ E +4 ♥8 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
450 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +1 ♦2 6-Formoso-Allen vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
|
3 |
♠A972
♥KJ7
♦T92
♣J65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♠ N +2 ♣K 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
150 2.63 1.38 3♦ S +2 ♣2 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
100 1.38 2.63 4♣ E -1 ♦A 6-Formoso-Allen vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
50 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♦6 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
|
4 |
♠AK2
♥KJ53
♦K43
♣QT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N N ♠7 1-Moller-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
100 2.63 1.38 1N N -1 ♣4 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 6-Formoso-Allen
200 0.75 3.25 1N N -2 ♣4 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
200 0.75 3.25 1♥ N -2 ♦2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
5 |
♠K4
♥KJ987
♦Q4
♣AQ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 1/2♦ 1/3♥ 1/2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♥ N +1 ♦K 1-Moller-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ N ♦K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
50 1.38 2.63 1N E -1 ♥5 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
90 0.13 3.88 1N E ♦3 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 6-Formoso-Allen
|
6 |
♠T7
♥987543
♦4
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4/3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 2♣ E -4 ♥A 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 6-Formoso-Allen
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♦4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ W ♦4 1-Moller-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
|
7 |
♠KQ876
♥96
♦KJ982
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.63 1.38 2♥ W +1 ♣4 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
140 2.63 1.38 2♥ E +1 ♠J 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Moller-Andrews
140 2.63 1.38 2♥ E +1 ♣2 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
170 0.13 3.88 2♥ E +2 ♦Q 6-Formoso-Allen vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
|
8 |
♠A8
♥K43
♦T642
♣Q753
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 2♠ E -1 ♣8 6-Formoso-Allen vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
100 2.63 1.38 3♣ N -2 ♦K 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
120 1.38 2.63 1N W +1 ♣3 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Moller-Andrews
400 0.13 3.88 3N E ♣8 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
|
9 |
♠A65
♥J73
♦Q6
♣KQ942
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 3.88 0.13 4♠* S ♦A 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
200 2.63 1.38 5♥ W -2 ♥7 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -1 ♦A 6-Formoso-Allen vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
50 0.75 3.25 3♠ S -1 ♥A 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Moller-Andrews
|
10 |
♠AQT4
♥J7632
♦K84
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2/1 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ N ♣A 1-Moller-Andrews vs 6-Formoso-Allen
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ E ♥T 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
150 0.75 3.25 1N W +2 ♠4 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
150 0.75 3.25 3♣ E +2 ♠2 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
11 |
♠94
♥AK64
♦KJ6
♣AQJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♦5/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N N ♦5 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
50 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦2 1-Moller-Andrews vs 6-Formoso-Allen
50 2.00 2.00 4♣ N -1 ♦A 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 0.13 3.88 3♥ N -2 ♦5 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
|
12 |
♠J7542
♥QJ
♦762
♣JT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4/3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 ♠4 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣J 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣J 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
170 0.13 3.88 2♥ W +2 ♠2 1-Moller-Andrews vs 6-Formoso-Allen
|
13 |
♠T6
♥KQJ9
♦K862
♣QT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2/-NT ♥6 ♠3 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥A 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣J 1-Moller-Andrews vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣2 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣2 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ E -1 ♠A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Formoso-Allen
|
14 |
♠AJ543
♥AQT
♦A2
♣J74
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦3 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦K 1-Moller-Andrews vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦K 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Formoso-Allen
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦3 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
|
15 |
♠Q83
♥A9654
♦Q2
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ W ♣6 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♥5 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♦Q 1-Moller-Andrews vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♣T 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Formoso-Allen
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♣6 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
|
16 |
♠843
♥8
♦KQT873
♣Q84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 5/4♥ 5/3NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 2♦ N +2 ♠7 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Formoso-Allen
130 3.50 0.50 2♦ N +2 ♣5 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♥6 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♠6 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Moller-Andrews
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +2 ♦3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
|
17 |
♠QJ
♥AKQ
♦75
♣KQJ854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 3/4♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♣ N ♦9 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Formoso-Allen
490 2.50 1.50 3N S +3 ♥3 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
490 2.50 1.50 3N N +3 ♠8 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
400 0.50 3.50 5♣ N ♠6 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Moller-Andrews
400 0.50 3.50 5♣ N ♠6 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
|
18 |
♠9854
♥AKQ3
♦95
♣K85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥5 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
150 3.00 1.00 5♦ E -3 ♠A 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
100 2.00 2.00 5♦ W -2 ♠9 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ W -1 ♥A 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Moller-Andrews
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ S -1 ♥5 9-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Formoso-Allen
|
19 |
♠84
♥A942
♦KQ83
♣QT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣A 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Formoso-Allen vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♦J 1-Moller-Andrews vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
130 0.50 3.50 4♦ S ♦7 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
|
20 |
♠Q73
♥AQT83
♦AT
♣Q72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♦4 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♦6 6-Formoso-Allen vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♦3 1-Moller-Andrews vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E ♥5 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
|
21 |
♠K
♥9854
♦752
♣AK752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -3 ♥K 6-Formoso-Allen vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♠A 1-Moller-Andrews vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♣J 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
200 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♦A 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
22 |
♠AKJ
♥J872
♦K5
♣QJ62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Moller-Andrews
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦4 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦4 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Formoso-Allen
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♣A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ N +2 ♠9 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
|
23 |
♠653
♥A54
♦AJ7632
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Moller-Andrews
230 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +3 ♦A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
230 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +3 ♣T 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
230 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +3 ♣T 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Formoso-Allen
230 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +4 ♠6 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
24 |
♠Q43
♥-
♦J9653
♣KQJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 ♠J 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 8-Ruggeri-Kobland
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 ♠J 7-Harken-Sabloff vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♠J 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Moller-Andrews
150 1.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♠5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Davidson-Schilling
300 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -2 ♣4 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Formoso-Allen
|
25 |
♠AT932
♥Q3
♦J642
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 3.88 0.13 3N S +4 ♣T 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Moller-Andrews
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣A 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣A 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
400 0.13 3.88 5♦ N ♥4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
|
26 |
♠AT8
♥842
♦J432
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 1N W -1 ♦J 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
90 2.63 1.38 1N W ♥2 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Moller-Andrews
200 0.75 3.25 2♥ S -2 ♣A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
200 0.75 3.25 3♦ S -2 ♣A 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
|
27 |
♠KJ9643
♥K7
♦K4
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -1 ♠J 10-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Sabloff
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠6 3-Davidson-Schilling vs 9-Osborn-Tidmore
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣A 8-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Moller-Andrews
450 0.13 3.88 4♥ W +1 ♠3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-O'Neill-Smart
|