1 |
♠98752
♥Q4
♦Q732
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6/5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 ♥Q 5-Loops-Martin vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥A 3-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Andrews-Moller
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦K 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
150 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♦K 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 1-Traback-Schilling
|
2 |
♠J8
♥Q2
♦A3
♣KQT9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣K 5-Loops-Martin vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 2.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣Q 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 1-Traback-Schilling
150 1.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♣K 3-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Andrews-Moller
300 0.00 3.00 4♣ N -3 ♦2 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
|
3 |
♠AKT
♥762
♦KJ842
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 2N* W -3 ♦4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 1-Traback-Schilling
200 2.00 1.00 4♣ E -2 ♣6 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ N ♣A 3-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Andrews-Moller
50 0.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♣A 5-Loops-Martin vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
4 |
♠8432
♥76
♦AJ9
♣QJT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♦3 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣Q 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 1-Traback-Schilling
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦6 3-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Andrews-Moller
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♣Q 5-Loops-Martin vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠AT974
♥Q92
♦95
♣T62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 0.50 1N E +1 ♦J 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Andrews-Moller
120 2.50 0.50 1N E +1 ♦6 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 1-Traback-Schilling
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♦J 3-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Loops-Martin
760 0.00 3.00 2♣** E +1 ♣3 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
|
6 |
♠A93
♥QJ9
♦T
♣JT9542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♠* S -3 ♥5 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦T 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 1-Traback-Schilling
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦T 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Andrews-Moller
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣J 3-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
7 |
♠AQ95432
♥AT
♦43
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♠6 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦K 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 1-Traback-Schilling
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦5 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Andrews-Moller
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♦K 3-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
8 |
♠AQ92
♥5
♦JT76
♣A842
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2N E -2 ♥4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
100 2.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♥4 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 1-Traback-Schilling
50 1.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♥4 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Andrews-Moller
50 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♣3 3-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
9 |
♠AJ98
♥542
♦T62
♣T98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♣T 7-Andrews-Moller vs 1-Traback-Schilling
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣T 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣T 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 3-Hullman-Pender
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣8 5-Loops-Martin vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
|
10 |
♠JT73
♥KJT62
♦T75
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦K 7-Andrews-Moller vs 1-Traback-Schilling
180 2.00 1.00 2N S +2 ♠Q 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
130 1.00 2.00 4♣ S ♥5 5-Loops-Martin vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♠8 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 3-Hullman-Pender
|
11 |
♠A32
♥A6
♦AKQJ73
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3NT ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.50 0.50 3N N ♠8 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 3-Hullman-Pender
400 2.50 0.50 3N N ♥3 7-Andrews-Moller vs 1-Traback-Schilling
50 0.50 2.50 5♦ N -1 ♥3 5-Loops-Martin vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
50 0.50 2.50 4♦ N -1 ♥3 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
12 |
♠8
♥Q752
♦KJ62
♣J942
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 6N W -2 ♠8 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 3-Hullman-Pender
100 2.00 1.00 6N W -2 ♥2 7-Andrews-Moller vs 1-Traback-Schilling
100 2.00 1.00 6♠ W -2 ♣2 5-Loops-Martin vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦2 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
13 |
♠JT94
♥72
♦63
♣AQJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠6 1-Traback-Schilling vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠2 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
100 1.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 ♣K 5-Loops-Martin vs 7-Andrews-Moller
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦6 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Hullman-Pender
|
14 |
♠T76
♥T4
♦A2
♣AKT842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♥* W -2 ♣A 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ N ♦8 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Hullman-Pender
90 1.00 2.00 1N N ♦4 5-Loops-Martin vs 7-Andrews-Moller
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♥5 1-Traback-Schilling vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
|
15 |
♠6
♥JT976
♦K93
♣A542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7♥ 6♠ 4NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥0 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♥8 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Hullman-Pender
650 1.50 1.50 5♠ S ♦A 1-Traback-Schilling vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦A 5-Loops-Martin vs 7-Andrews-Moller
230 0.00 3.00 3♠ S +3 ♥8 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
|
16 |
♠J743
♥J6
♦KJ52
♣Q73
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4/3♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦9 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Hullman-Pender
150 2.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♣4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♣9 1-Traback-Schilling vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
120 0.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♦4 5-Loops-Martin vs 7-Andrews-Moller
|
17 |
♠JT9
♥QJT6
♦J6
♣9853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♠4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 5-Loops-Martin
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♦5 7-Andrews-Moller vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
480 0.50 2.50 5♠ E +1 ♥7 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Traback-Schilling
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 ♥7 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 3-Hullman-Pender
|
18 |
♠9865
♥Q52
♦AQJ87
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠5 7-Andrews-Moller vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♣6 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 3-Hullman-Pender
50 1.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 ♣A 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 5-Loops-Martin
400 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -4 ♦6 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Traback-Schilling
|
19 |
♠A42
♥-
♦J7432
♣J7643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠3/4 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 2/3♠ 4NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♠A 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 5-Loops-Martin
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ W ♦2 7-Andrews-Moller vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
650 0.50 2.50 5♥ W ♠A 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Traback-Schilling
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♣7 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 3-Hullman-Pender
|
20 |
♠98
♥8432
♦KT863
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠5 6-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Traback-Schilling
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠5 7-Andrews-Moller vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♠5 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 3-Hullman-Pender
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♦4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
21 |
♠QT2
♥9432
♦J8
♣9874
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦J 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♦J 3-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♣4 7-Andrews-Moller vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♦A 1-Traback-Schilling vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
22 |
♠984
♥53
♦Q9762
♣KT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6/5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♦A 1-Traback-Schilling vs 5-Loops-Martin
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦A 3-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦A 7-Andrews-Moller vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
150 0.00 3.00 2N S -3 ♥T 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
23 |
♠Q765
♥K764
♦2
♣Q543
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ W +1 ♦2 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ W +2 ♥4 3-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
180 1.00 2.00 1N E +3 ♠3 7-Andrews-Moller vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
630 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠2 1-Traback-Schilling vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
24 |
♠T
♥AK954
♦QT43
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 4♣ S ♠2 1-Traback-Schilling vs 5-Loops-Martin
50 2.00 1.00 4♦ N -1 ♣9 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥7 3-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Ruggeri-Loops
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E ♥7 7-Andrews-Moller vs 2-Ray-Spinazze
|
25 |
♠AQJT
♥J9
♦Q52
♣Q653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3/2 |
EW: 3♣ 4/5♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1♠ N -3 ♣7 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 5-Loops-Martin
210 2.00 1.00 2N W +3 ♣3 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 7-Andrews-Moller
600 1.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 1-Traback-Schilling vs 3-Hullman-Pender
630 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♠Q 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
26 |
♠A42
♥T7
♦T6532
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.50 0.50 3N S ♠3 1-Traback-Schilling vs 3-Hullman-Pender
600 2.50 0.50 3N S ♣4 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 7-Andrews-Moller
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠3 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♠3 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 5-Loops-Martin
|
27 |
♠AJ75
♥J9
♦J54
♣A763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♥* E -2 ♣2 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 7-Andrews-Moller
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 5-Loops-Martin
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♥9 1-Traback-Schilling vs 3-Hullman-Pender
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦4 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
28 |
♠Q
♥AJ54
♦T8743
♣T76
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠* E -1 ♣4 2-Ray-Spinazze vs 6-Johnson-Wesolowski
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣8 1-Traback-Schilling vs 3-Hullman-Pender
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦A 4-Ruggeri-Loops vs 5-Loops-Martin
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠K 8-Llacera-Gamble vs 7-Andrews-Moller
|