1 |
♠AJ54
♥T
♦T63
♣AQT54
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.92 0.08 4♥* W -3 ♠A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
450 4.17 1.83 4♠ S +1 ♥K 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Foy-Foy
450 4.17 1.83 4♠ N +1 ♥8 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.83 4.17 4♠ S ♣J 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
420 1.83 4.17 4♠ N ♥6 5-Barr-Barr vs 8-Johnson-Jean
140 0.08 5.92 3♥ W ♠6 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
2 |
♠A96
♥AK42
♦AT52
♣KQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.92 0.08 3N N +1 ♣7 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Foy-Foy
600 2.42 3.58 3N S ♠4 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
600 2.42 3.58 3N N ♠J 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
600 2.42 3.58 3N N ♥T 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
600 2.42 3.58 3N N ♥T 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
600 2.42 3.58 3N N ♥6 5-Barr-Barr vs 8-Johnson-Jean
|
3 |
♠9652
♥4
♦AQ93
♣Q853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.33 0.67 3N E -2 ♣4 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
200 5.33 0.67 6♥ E -2 ♣T 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
200 3.58 2.42 2♠ E +3 ♣4 5-Barr-Barr vs 8-Johnson-Jean
650 1.25 4.75 4♥ E +1 ♦7 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Foy-Foy
650 1.25 4.75 4♥ E +1 ♣J 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
650 1.25 4.75 4♥ E +1 ♣4 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
4 |
♠KJ843
♥A4
♦QJ54
♣A6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♥ 4♠ 1/2NT ♦5/6 ♥6/7 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.92 0.08 4♠ N +2 ♥2 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Johnson-Jean
650 4.75 1.25 4♠ N +1 ♦A 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
620 3.58 2.42 4♠ N ♦A 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
170 2.42 3.58 2♠ N +2 ♦A 2-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 0.67 5.33 4♠ S -1 ♣3 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
100 0.67 5.33 2♥ N -1 ♦A 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
5 |
♠QT7
♥J87
♦KJT82
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.92 0.08 1N N ♠6 2-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 4.75 1.25 2N S -1 ♠3 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
200 2.42 3.58 2N S -2 ♠2 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Johnson-Jean
200 2.42 3.58 2♦ N -2 ♠6 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
200 2.42 3.58 3♣ S -2 ♥2 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
400 0.08 5.92 3N S -4 ♠3 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
6 |
♠6
♥J8432
♦A97
♣T876
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ ♥5/4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.92 0.08 2♣ S ♠9 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Johnson-Jean
170 2.42 3.58 3♠ W +1 ♦A 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
170 2.42 3.58 3♠ W +1 ♦A 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
170 2.42 3.58 2♠ W +2 ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
170 2.42 3.58 2♠ W +2 ♣T 2-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Harken-Tainty
170 2.42 3.58 1♠ W +3 ♦A 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠QT2
♥AKJ8
♦8764
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.33 0.67 3♦ W -1 ♥A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Foy-Foy
100 5.33 0.67 2♦ W -1 ♥A 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 8-Johnson-Jean
90 3.58 2.42 2♦ W ♥A 2-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
110 1.83 4.17 3♦ W ♥A 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 1.83 4.17 3♣ E ♦5 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
120 0.08 5.92 1N E +1 ♠5 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
8 |
♠KQ953
♥8
♦Q642
♣J65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3/2♠ ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.75 1.25 4♥ W ♠K 2-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
420 4.75 1.25 4♥ W ♠K 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Harken-Tainty
420 4.75 1.25 4♥ W ♥8 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.83 4.17 4♥ W +1 ♠K 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Foy-Foy
450 1.83 4.17 4♥ W +1 ♦2 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 8-Johnson-Jean
650 0.08 5.92 5♥* W ♠3 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
9 |
♠AQJ5
♥AT87
♦AQ6
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ -/2♥ -/1NT ♦5/6 ♥6/8 ♠5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.33 0.67 3♠ N ♣A 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
140 5.33 0.67 2♠ N +1 ♣A 2-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
50 3.58 2.42 3♠ N -1 ♣A 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 2.42 3.58 3♣ E ♥Q 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 8-Johnson-Jean
130 0.67 5.33 4♣ E ♠3 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
130 0.67 5.33 3♣ E +1 ♥Q 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Foy-Foy
|
10 |
♠A7654
♥T7
♦T73
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 2♥ E -2 ♦Q 2-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Johnson-Jean
170 4.75 1.25 2♣ S +4 ♥6 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
150 3.00 3.00 2♣ S +3 ♥6 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
150 3.00 3.00 2♣ S +3 ♥6 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
130 1.25 4.75 2♣ S +2 ♥6 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Foy-Foy
100 0.08 5.92 4♣ S -1 ♦2 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
|
11 |
♠754
♥Q983
♦92
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2/3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥3 2-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Johnson-Jean
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥3 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥3 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣K 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣K 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
460 3.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣6 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Foy-Foy
|
12 |
♠JT84
♥A6
♦Q94
♣A762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.17 1.83 4♠ W -1 ♦4 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
50 4.17 1.83 4♠ E -1 ♣3 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
50 4.17 1.83 4♠ E -1 ♣3 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Foy-Foy
50 4.17 1.83 3♠ E -1 ♣3 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
140 1.25 4.75 3♠ E ♦7 2-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Johnson-Jean
420 0.08 5.92 4♠ E ♥4 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
13 |
♠T975
♥842
♦T964
♣76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥8 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥8 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥8 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 8-Johnson-Jean
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ W ♥2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Foy-Foy
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥8 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♥6 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♥2 2-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
14 |
♠K85
♥AKT53
♦43
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥4 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 8-Johnson-Jean
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♥Q 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
400 4.50 1.50 3N N ♥Q 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Foy-Foy
150 3.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♥Q 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ S +1 ♦J 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
100 1.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♦T 2-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
150 0.00 6.00 3N S -3 ♥6 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠653
♥K87
♦954
♣T864
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 6.00 0.00 1N S ♦6 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
50 5.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♣4 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 8-Johnson-Jean
90 4.00 2.00 1N W ♣8 2-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
100 3.00 3.00 1♣ S -1 ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Foy-Foy
110 2.00 4.00 2♦ W +1 ♣4 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
120 1.00 5.00 2N E ♣K 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
300 0.00 6.00 1♣ S -3 ♦K 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
16 |
♠4
♥AKQJ754
♦T3
♣KT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ ♣0/4 ♦6/0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.17 1.83 5♠ S +1 ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
480 4.17 1.83 4♠ S +2 ♣9 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Foy-Foy
480 4.17 1.83 4♠ S +2 ♣9 2-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
480 4.17 1.83 4♠ S +2 ♣8 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Harken-Tainty
450 0.67 5.33 4♠ S +1 ♦A 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
450 0.67 5.33 4♥ N +1 ♣5 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Johnson-Jean
|
17 |
♠98632
♥KQ6
♦A4
♣A97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1/2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 2♥ S +1 ♦6 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Johnson-Jean
120 4.75 1.25 2N S ♥J 2-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
90 3.58 2.42 1N S ♦6 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Foy-Foy
80 2.42 3.58 1♠ N ♣K 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Harken-Tainty
50 1.25 4.75 3♥ N -1 ♦6 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
110 0.08 5.92 3♣ E ♠4 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
|
18 |
♠AQ7
♥T86
♦KT876
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 4♥ W -3 ♦5 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
110 4.75 1.25 1♥ E +1 ♣Q 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Johnson-Jean
150 3.58 2.42 2N E +1 ♦5 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Harken-Tainty
170 2.42 3.58 2♥ E +2 ♦5 2-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
210 1.25 4.75 2N W +3 ♦7 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Foy-Foy
800 0.08 5.92 2♦* N -3 ♥A 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
|
19 |
♠Q76
♥J42
♦T9432
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.33 0.67 1N S -1 ♣3 2-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
50 5.33 0.67 1N S -1 ♣3 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
100 3.00 3.00 1N S -2 ♣3 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 3.00 3.00 1N S -2 ♣3 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
140 1.25 4.75 1♠ W +2 ♦T 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Foy-Foy
150 0.08 5.92 2N W +1 ♠6 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
20 |
♠A62
♥JT42
♦J43
♣Q86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.92 0.08 2N S ♠Q 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
110 4.17 1.83 2♥ S ♠Q 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
110 4.17 1.83 2♥ N ♦2 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.42 3.58 2♥ S -1 ♠Q 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Foy-Foy
200 0.67 5.33 3♥ S -2 ♠Q 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
200 0.67 5.33 3♥ S -2 ♠Q 2-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
21 |
♠J54
♥AK87
♦Q6
♣AKQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.33 0.67 3N N ♥2 2-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
600 5.33 0.67 3N N ♦3 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
200 3.58 2.42 2♠ N +3 ♥2 7-Emanuel-Frank vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
150 2.42 3.58 1N N +2 ♥2 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Foy-Foy
140 1.25 4.75 2♥ N +1 ♦T 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Stone-Shoemaker
100 0.08 5.92 3N N -1 ♥2 1-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
22 |
♠9532
♥854
♦JT5
♣KT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3N E -1 ♦2 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 8-Johnson-Jean
600 3.58 2.42 3N W ♠2 2-Osborn-Winham vs 3-Foy-Foy
600 3.58 2.42 3N E ♠5 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
600 3.58 2.42 3N E ♥2 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Harken-Tainty
630 0.67 5.33 3N E +1 ♥2 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
630 0.67 5.33 3N E +1 ♥2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
|
23 |
♠AT543
♥AJ87
♦T7
♣J2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2/1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.92 0.08 3N S +1 ♦4 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Harken-Tainty
170 4.75 1.25 2♣ S +4 ♠6 8-Gassman-Swanson vs 8-Johnson-Jean
150 3.58 2.42 2♣ S +3 ♦4 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
130 2.42 3.58 4♣ S ♥Q 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.67 5.33 3♣ S ♠6 2-Osborn-Winham vs 3-Foy-Foy
110 0.67 5.33 1♣ S +2 ♠6 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
|
24 |
♠KJ7
♥KQT76
♦Q5
♣AT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.80 0.20 3N S +3 ♦9 2-Osborn-Winham vs 3-Foy-Foy
460 4.40 1.60 3N S +2 ♠3 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Erickson-Kissiah
430 3.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♣7 6-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Ruggeri-Xu
420 1.60 4.40 4♥ N ♠5 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.20 5.80 4♠ N -1 ♥J 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|