1 |
♠J97
♥K7
♦J9865
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4/5 ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 4.50 1.50 4♣ S -2 ♠5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 4.50 1.50 4♣ S -2 ♦K 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ducey-Foy
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♥3 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
200 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♥3 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
450 0.50 5.50 5♥ E ♦A 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.50 5.50 4♥ W +1 ♣K 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
|
2 |
♠KQ762
♥K
♦8632
♣QT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 5.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
200 4.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 ♠8 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠5 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠4 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ducey-Foy
450 0.00 6.00 5♥ E ♦A 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
3 |
♠AQJT52
♥4
♦8742
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ducey-Foy
250 5.00 1.00 4♠ N -5 ♣K 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♠A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠7 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠7 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠7 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
680 0.00 6.00 4♥ E +2 ♣9 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
4 |
♠Q986
♥84
♦QT9
♣A742
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.50 1.50 3N S ♠J 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
600 4.50 1.50 3N S ♠J 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
600 4.50 1.50 3N S ♠3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
600 4.50 1.50 3N N ♦2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♠3 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♣J 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♣J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Ducey-Foy
|
5 |
♠QJ74
♥T93
♦KT98
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.50 0.50 1N W -3 ♦8 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
150 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -3 ♣A 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
100 4.00 2.00 1N W -2 ♦8 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
50 2.50 3.50 1N W -1 ♦8 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Ducey-Foy
50 2.50 3.50 3♠ W -1 ♣A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 5.00 2♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 0.00 6.00 2♠ W ♣A 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
|
6 |
♠K4
♥T7
♦AJT86
♣AT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 7♦ 6♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 6.00 0.00 7♦ N ♥Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
940 5.00 1.00 6♦ N +1 ♥Q 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
480 4.00 2.00 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Ducey-Foy
460 3.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♥Q 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
440 1.50 4.50 5♦ N +2 ♥Q 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
440 1.50 4.50 5♦ N +2 ♥Q 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
190 0.00 6.00 3♦ N +4 ♥Q 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
|
7 |
♠KJT63
♥876
♦63
♣532
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥A 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
200 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♠8 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 4.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ E ♥2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Ducey-Foy
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ E ♦A 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Johnson-Jean
140 1.00 5.00 1♥ E +2 ♦Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 ♥9 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
|
8 |
♠KJ9
♥653
♦82
♣AJ764
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.50 0.50 3♣ S +1 ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Ducey-Foy
130 5.50 0.50 2♣ S +2 ♦K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
120 3.00 3.00 2N S ♦K 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
120 3.00 3.00 2N S ♦9 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
120 3.00 3.00 2N S ♦4 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 0.50 5.50 2N S -1 ♦9 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
50 0.50 5.50 5♣ S -1 ♥8 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
9 |
♠T7
♥A854
♦AQ2
♣KJT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♥ S ♦6 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Ducey-Foy
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ W ♥4 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ W ♣7 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
140 2.42 3.58 2♠ W +1 ♥4 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
170 1.25 4.75 3♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
620 0.08 5.92 4♠ W ♥A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
10 |
♠A8
♥732
♦KQJ95
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠4/3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 6.00 0.00 1N W ♦9 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 3.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠7 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♠7 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♠3 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
100 3.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♦2 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ducey-Foy
130 1.00 5.00 3♣ W +1 ♦K 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.00 6.00 4♥ S -2 ♦2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
11 |
♠AQJ87
♥-
♦KT852
♣Q95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT4/3 |
EW: 3/4♥ -/2NT ♣5/6 ♦5/6 ♠3/4 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 1.00 4♥* E -1 ♠2 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♠2 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♠2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
50 3.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♠2 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ducey-Foy
140 1.50 4.50 3♥ E ♠2 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
140 1.50 4.50 2♥ E +1 ♠2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
170 0.00 6.00 3♥ E +1 ♠9 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
12 |
♠962
♥AQ32
♦97
♣T854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 3♦ S ♠K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 5.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 ♠K 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ducey-Foy
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ E ♦K 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ E +1 ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ E +1 ♦K 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ E +1 ♣K 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
170 1.50 4.50 2♠ E +2 ♣K 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
13 |
♠2
♥J642
♦K842
♣KQ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.00 0.00 2♠* W -2 ♥J 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
300 5.00 1.00 3N E -3 ♥T 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣J 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣J 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ducey-Foy
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
100 1.00 5.00 1N E -1 ♠6 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
100 0.00 6.00 3♥ N -1 ♣5 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
14 |
♠63
♥K864
♦Q87
♣6542
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠4/3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♥2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
100 4.50 1.50 1♦ S -2 ♣Q 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 4.50 1.50 1♦ S -2 ♣Q 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ducey-Foy
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ W ♥4 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 2.50 3.50 1♠ E +1 ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
130 1.00 5.00 3♦ E +1 ♥2 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
500 0.00 6.00 4♥* N -3 ♠2 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠AT5
♥97
♦AQ85
♣J987
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1/3NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.33 0.67 4♥ S +2 ♣A 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Johnson-Jean
680 5.33 0.67 4♥ S +2 ♣A 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
650 3.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
650 3.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ducey-Foy
620 0.67 5.33 4♥ S ♣A 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
620 0.67 5.33 4♥ S ♣A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠K95
♥JT654
♦A8
♣Q76
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1/-♠ 3NT ♦6 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥3 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 5.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♠Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♣4 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Ducey-Foy
90 3.00 3.00 1N W ♥5 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
120 1.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♥5 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
120 1.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♥5 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
120 1.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♥4 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
|
17 |
♠43
♥J8542
♦A2
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 5.00 1.00 3♣ E -2 ♥3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
50 4.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♣5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♥6 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 2.00 4.00 2♥ W ♠3 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Ducey-Foy
120 1.00 5.00 2N W ♠4 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
150 0.00 6.00 2N E +1 ♠6 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
|
18 |
♠T874
♥7
♦KT983
♣J73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♦3 ♠2 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 2.00 5♠ S ♥A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
650 4.00 2.00 5♠ S ♦5 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
650 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
650 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦5 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Ducey-Foy
650 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦5 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
300 1.00 5.00 5♥* W -2 ♠4 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
50 0.00 6.00 4♥ W -1 ♦T 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
19 |
♠K643
♥T6
♦QT85
♣AJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 4♠ 4NT ♣7/6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥5 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥4 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
130 4.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Johnson-Jean
140 2.50 3.50 3♠ W ♥2 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
140 2.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥4 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Ducey-Foy
600 1.00 5.00 5♦ E ♥Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♥T 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
|
20 |
♠K
♥T95432
♦63
♣T876
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 4.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♦4 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
140 4.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♣Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Ducey-Foy
130 1.00 5.00 4♣ E ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
800 0.00 6.00 4♠* S -3 ♣A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
21 |
♠K93
♥AKJ852
♦T2
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦J 2-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦J 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦J 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Ducey-Foy
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Johnson-Jean
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♦J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ S ♣6 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Ruggeri
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -1 ♦J 1-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Tainty-Osborn
|