| 1 |
♠J72
♥Q843
♦Q72
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N E -3 ♦J 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♠8 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
90 0.00 2.00 1N E ♠8 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 2 |
♠AK87
♥AKQ5
♦AK6
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 6♥ 7♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 2.00 0.00 6♠ S ♦T 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Winham-Murdock
660 1.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 2.00 6N N -1 ♣2 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 3 |
♠T9
♥QJ7643
♦9742
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥3 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 ♣K 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Winham-Murdock
690 0.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♥6 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 4 |
♠965
♥AK3
♦AK3
♣J643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♦Q 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♦5 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
|
| 5 |
♠A7
♥J
♦AKQ765
♣J532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2/3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -2 ♦J 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♦A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♣A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
| 6 |
♠7
♥AT873
♦9642
♣JT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -4 ♥3 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♠3 4-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 7 |
♠J2
♥T4
♦J96
♣J97432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 1.00 1.00 6♠ W +1 ♠2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
1460 1.00 1.00 6♠ W +1 ♥T 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
1460 1.00 1.00 6♠ W +1 ♣4 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 8 |
♠KT952
♥AJ6
♦32
♣T85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5/6 ♦6/7 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6/5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♣A 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣K 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♣A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 9 |
♠AJ54
♥KJ3
♦J754
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♥2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ S +2 ♠K 4-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♥6 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 10 |
♠AK5
♥KQ
♦KT83
♣9742
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣7/6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
120 1.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠8 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ E +1 ♥2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 11 |
♠J986
♥KJ4
♦763
♣J92
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♦7 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Murdock
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣9 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 12 |
♠J964
♥A3
♦Q764
♣J97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 7♦ 7♠ 7NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 2.00 0.00 6♠ S ♣2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Murdock
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
630 0.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
|
| 13 |
♠Q53
♥KT8
♦T95
♣8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 1♦ 6♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ E ♦K 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♦8 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
990 0.00 2.00 4♥* E +1 ♦K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 14 |
♠A73
♥AQJ95
♦T92
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ E ♦3 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ E +1 ♦3 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 15 |
♠K8
♥AT43
♦AQT6
♣T76
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1/2NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ S +1 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 1.00 1♠ W -1 ♣6 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♠3 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 16 |
♠9732
♥T984
♦AJ9
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠4 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ E ♦7 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♠4 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠Q8
♥KQJ
♦94
♣KJT832
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦6 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♥5 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
150 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 ♦3 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 18 |
♠8
♥Q9543
♦Q76
♣QT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥4 3-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦T 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦T 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠QT86
♥942
♦652
♣QT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 1♠ W -1 ♦6 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
70 1.00 1.00 1♦ S ♥5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 20 |
♠K73
♥Q3
♦A62
♣K9732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4/3 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
200 0.50 1.50 3♠ S -2 ♦Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
200 0.50 1.50 2♥ W +3 ♠3 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 21 |
♠T7
♥AKJ864
♦8
♣KQJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥1/2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Xu-Nathanson
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♥J 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦2 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|