| 1 |
♠Q874
♥J43
♦AQ84
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♥8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♣3 2-Modest-Loops vs 3-Loops-Walker
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠K 3-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦T 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♣3 5-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 2 |
♠K752
♥93
♦T9876
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 4N W ♦T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
430 3.50 0.50 3N W +1 ♦T 3-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦T 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♣9 2-Modest-Loops vs 3-Loops-Walker
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♣9 5-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 3 |
♠AKJT6
♥K5
♦JT94
♣87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 2/3♣ 3/4♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥9 2-Modest-Loops vs 3-Loops-Walker
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠A 3-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠A 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠A 5-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 4 |
♠Q76
♥QJ6
♦95
♣KT764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣3 5-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S ♠7 2-Modest-Loops vs 3-Loops-Walker
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♥2 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 0.00 4.00 5♠ S -2 ♦4 3-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 5 |
♠AJ63
♥K3
♦KQ72
♣AT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♠ N ♥Q 5-Winham-Davidson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.63 1.38 3♠ S ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 0.75 3.25 4♠ N -1 ♥Q 2-Modest-Loops vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 0.75 3.25 4♠ N -1 ♥Q 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 6 |
♠AK653
♥A53
♦AKQ5
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT6 |
| EW: 5♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠Q 5-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Walker
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
50 1.50 2.50 6♥ S -1 ♣A 2-Modest-Loops vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
50 1.50 2.50 6♥ S -1 ♣A 3-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
750 0.00 4.00 5♣* E ♥K 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
| 7 |
♠94
♥T876
♦AQ82
♣864
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠5 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠K 3-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♦5 5-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Walker
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♠K 2-Modest-Loops vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 8 |
♠K7
♥J965
♦8432
♣843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♣7 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
50 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣2 3-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♦5 5-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Walker
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♣2 2-Modest-Loops vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 9 |
♠AT2
♥94
♦A852
♣Q875
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♦ W -2 ♥9 2-Modest-Loops vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 3.50 0.50 3♦ W -2 ♥9 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ S +2 ♠J 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♠J 5-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Walker
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♦K 3-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠AT85
♥A9
♦K83
♣T965
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♣ N ♥7 3-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ W +1 ♦3 2-Modest-Loops vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ W +1 ♣9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ W +1 ♣5 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
| 11 |
♠7
♥Q652
♦J743
♣T643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 1♠ S ♠2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 1♠ S -1 ♥4 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.50 2.50 1♠ S -2 ♠2 3-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♣7 2-Modest-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
150 0.00 4.00 1♠ S -3 ♠3 5-Winham-Davidson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 12 |
♠KT654
♥K2
♦Q862
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 ♣7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥T 2-Modest-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -2 ♦5 3-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ W -1 ♣6 5-Winham-Davidson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ W -1 ♦2 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 13 |
♠76543
♥6
♦K8765
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠6 |
| EW: 4/3♥ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♥ E +1 ♣K 2-Modest-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ E ♠9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ E ♣K 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ E ♣K 5-Winham-Davidson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 14 |
♠J942
♥T92
♦QT64
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦5 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♦6 2-Modest-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦5 5-Winham-Davidson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
1100 0.00 4.00 3N* S -5 ♣7 3-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 15 |
♠T62
♥KQ8
♦KJ732
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣K 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +3 ♣6 2-Modest-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥J 5-Winham-Davidson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
420 0.00 4.00 5♣ E +1 ♠2 3-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 16 |
♠AT94
♥7
♦87
♣A98632
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2/1NT ♣5/4 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2♣* N ♦K 5-Winham-Davidson vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♣7 2-Modest-Loops vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♦8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
150 1.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♣9 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
1100 0.00 4.00 3N* S -5 ♣7 3-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 17 |
♠KQT96
♥982
♦A976
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♦ ♣1 ♦7/6 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♦ S -2 ♠5 2-Modest-Loops vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
150 3.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♠K 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
190 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +5 ♦Q 5-Winham-Davidson vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
420 1.00 3.00 5♣ E +1 ♠2 3-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 18 |
♠AKT6
♥Q4
♦KJT5
♣T82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♠3 5-Winham-Davidson vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♥A 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♥2 2-Modest-Loops vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +1 ♥2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠9 3-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 19 |
♠Q74
♥AJT4
♦K8
♣T865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 1.00 2N S ♦4 3-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
120 3.00 1.00 2N S ♦3 5-Winham-Davidson vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♦4 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♦4 2-Modest-Loops vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 ♦5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 20 |
♠94
♥JT62
♦AKQT763
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.88 0.13 3N S +3 ♣7 5-Winham-Davidson vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣7 2-Modest-Loops vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
600 0.13 3.88 3N S ♣7 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 21 |
♠T32
♥9
♦AT2
♣J97543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ W ♣5 3-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 2-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 5-Winham-Davidson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 22 |
♠73
♥Q9864
♦K97
♣JT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 |
| EW: 2♥ 4♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦K 5-Winham-Davidson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 ♥7 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
230 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +4 ♣9 3-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥7 2-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 23 |
♠J985
♥K76
♦964
♣K42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣4 3-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
600 3.00 1.00 3N W ♣2 5-Winham-Davidson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♣7 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
690 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♥6 2-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 24 |
♠QJT
♥AT
♦AQ85
♣AK74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠5 2-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠5 3-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥9 5-Winham-Davidson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
400 0.50 3.50 3N N ♠8 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
400 0.50 3.50 5♣ S ♥3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 25 |
♠KQJT6
♥-
♦KJT
♣AK973
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♣5 3-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
460 3.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♦2 5-Winham-Davidson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦2 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
430 0.00 4.00 3N N +1 ♦4 2-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|