| 1 |
♠T852
♥QJ
♦T93
♣6543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
| EW: 7/6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 4/3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♥ E +1 ♠K 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠K 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠K 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♥7 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 2 |
♠KT972
♥KT3
♦42
♣K98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♥6 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥J 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ W -2 ♣9 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
90 0.00 3.00 1N S ♥2 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
|
| 3 |
♠96542
♥A9
♦J4
♣K754
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 5♦ 5♥ 1/2♠ 1/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♦J 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♣4 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♠5 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦J 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
| 4 |
♠QJ932
♥-
♦T765
♣J543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 1/-♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥7/6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6/5 ♠1/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1000 3.00 0.00 4♥** E -2 ♥A 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♣8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ N +2 ♥Q 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ S ♣A 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
|
| 5 |
♠854
♥QT87
♦T64
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥2 ♠4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦* E -1 ♥A 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦K 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.00 2.00 4♦ E ♥A 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♦K 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 6 |
♠A97542
♥T94
♦K86
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1/0 ♦3 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♣ W -3 ♠A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦5 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠A 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
680 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠3 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 7 |
♠AT9642
♥K
♦J5
♣T863
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥9 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 ♠K 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
90 0.00 3.00 1N W ♠6 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠J
♥AKQJ83
♦A975
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 5♥ N ♦T 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦5 8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦2 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 9 |
♠Q53
♥53
♦QJ7532
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ 2♥ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 2♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 4♥ S -1 ♠K 7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.83 2.17 3♠ E +1 ♥K 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
170 0.83 2.17 3♠ E +1 ♣A 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 10 |
♠AJ84
♥J75
♦QJ2
♣J64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 1.50 1N S +2 ♥8 7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.50 1.50 1N S +2 ♥6 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
150 1.50 1.50 1N S +2 ♥4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
| 11 |
♠AKJT2
♥K
♦T965
♣643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.83 0.17 3N S +1 ♣Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N ♦5 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 0.17 2.83 4♠ N -2 ♣A 7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 12 |
♠95
♥K873
♦92
♣AKQ84
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠3 |
| EW: 4♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.95 1.65 2♠ E +1 ♣2 7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.65 1.95 4♠ E ♣2 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 13 |
♠AK3
♥Q75
♦QJT5
♣743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N N ♥J 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
150 2.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♥J 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.00 2.00 2N N ♦8 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦9 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 14 |
♠43
♥QJ753
♦J86
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♦ 6♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
480 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠8 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♣Q 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
50 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♣5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 15 |
♠875
♥Q974
♦K
♣KT852
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3/-NT ♦6 ♠6/5 NT9/6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♥2 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
120 2.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♣9 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♥2 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
300 0.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♠3 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 16 |
♠743
♥AQJT
♦2
♣A8632
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2/3 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT2/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.00 1.00 2♦ S +3 ♥5 5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♦2 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
50 0.00 3.00 2♣ N -1 ♠K 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 17 |
♠K98
♥KJ964
♦A3
♣T86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♠* E -1 ♥Q 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♥Q 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ E ♥Q 7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 18 |
♠Q2
♥T954
♦AQ94
♣943
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ ♥4 ♠4/5 NT6 |
| EW: 3/2♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -2 ♠3 7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦7 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
420 0.17 2.83 4♥ E ♦8 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 19 |
♠KJ982
♥54
♦QJ932
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♣A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
50 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -1 ♦T 7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
50 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -1 ♦5 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 20 |
♠T975
♥A82
♦KQ7
♣J62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ S ♥T 7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ S ♥T 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
90 0.17 2.83 2♦ S ♥T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 21 |
♠AT762
♥7
♦K875
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 2N S +1 ♦2 7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♦2 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
110 0.17 2.83 2♣ S +1 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 22 |
♠KQ5
♥AKQ
♦A64
♣9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +2 ♥T 7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +2 ♥6 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +2 ♣3 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 23 |
♠AT95
♥762
♦AT7
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 3♦ S +1 ♠K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ S ♣A 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ W ♦7 7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 24 |
♠T432
♥4
♦AKJ97
♣A53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1/-♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥7/6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 5♣ S +1 ♠A 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
170 0.83 2.17 4♣ S +2 ♠A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
170 0.83 2.17 4♣ S +2 ♦Q 7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 25 |
♠T53
♥973
♦AT84
♣KQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♦9 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 ♦9 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
140 0.17 2.83 3♥ S ♦9 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
| 26 |
♠T7
♥KQT5
♦J98
♣K975
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ W ♠T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ W +1 ♣4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
170 0.83 2.17 2♥ W +2 ♠T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 27 |
♠QJ2
♥KQ97
♦T62
♣J62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ E ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
110 2.17 0.83 3♦ E ♣A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
130 0.17 2.83 3♦ E +1 ♣A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 28 |
♠-
♥QJ54
♦Q73
♣KJ9632
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 3♣ N ♠A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.50 1.50 4♣ N -1 ♥T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
140 0.17 2.83 3♥ E ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
|