| 1 |
♠T74
♥KT72
♦A962
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.75 0.25 3N E -2 ♠8 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
180 3.25 1.75 2N E +2 ♠2 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
400 1.75 3.25 3N E ♣5 2-Barr-Barr vs 6-Harken-Winham
430 0.25 4.75 3N E +1 ♠6 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
|
| 2 |
♠K82
♥KJ65
♦63
♣AQT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.75 0.25 2♠ S +1 ♦A 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
130 1.75 3.25 4♣ N ♦K 2-Barr-Barr vs 6-Harken-Winham
130 1.75 3.25 4♣ N ♦K 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
130 1.75 3.25 3♣ S +1 ♠6 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
|
| 3 |
♠J732
♥AT2
♦K86
♣K54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 2.75 3♠ E -1 ♦2 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
100 3.25 2.75 2♠ E -1 ♥3 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
170 2.50 3.50 2♠ E +2 ♣3 6-Harken-Winham vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 4 |
♠AT872
♥QJ
♦865
♣Q74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2/-♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥8/6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦3 6-Harken-Winham vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♦2 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 2.50 3.50 2♥ W -1 ♦2 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
|
| 5 |
♠AJ3
♥T8753
♦K65
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5/4 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 2.75 3♠ S +1 ♣2 2-Barr-Barr vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
170 3.25 2.75 2♠ S +2 ♥2 9-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
100 2.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣2 7-Johnson-Jean vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 6 |
♠AT5
♥KQ98
♦6
♣KJ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 6♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♥3 7-Johnson-Jean vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
150 3.00 3.00 4♦ E +1 ♣2 2-Barr-Barr vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
200 2.50 3.50 2♠ W +3 ♥K 9-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
|
| 7 |
♠KQJT
♥J7
♦842
♣J842
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.25 1.75 3♥ E +2 ♠A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Barr-Barr
200 3.25 1.75 3♥ E +2 ♠A 14-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
200 3.25 1.75 2♥ E +3 ♦5 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
650 0.25 4.75 4♥ E +1 ♦5 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 8 |
♠J875
♥-
♦962
♣AJT853
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 4/5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 1.00 3N W ♣8 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
400 4.00 1.00 3N W ♣8 14-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
450 1.75 3.25 4♥ W +1 ♣A 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 6-Harken-Winham
490 0.25 4.75 3N W +3 ♦9 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Barr-Barr
|
| 9 |
♠AT5
♥85
♦Q8432
♣983
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♥6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.75 0.25 3♠ E -1 ♥K 14-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Barr-Barr
110 3.25 1.75 2♠ E ♥K 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Johnson-Jean
140 1.75 3.25 3♠ E ♥K 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
170 0.25 4.75 3♠ E +1 ♣A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 10 |
♠AK852
♥K754
♦9
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.75 0.25 2N N +1 ♠Q 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Johnson-Jean
140 3.25 1.75 3♥ N ♠Q 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
110 1.75 3.25 2♠ N ♣J 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
160 0.25 4.75 1♠* E ♦K 14-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Barr-Barr
|
| 11 |
♠QJT75
♥AT6
♦AK6
♣J4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♥3 6-Harken-Winham vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
420 4.30 0.70 4♠ N ♥2 9-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
170 1.90 3.10 3♠ N +1 ♥7 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
170 1.90 3.10 2♠ N +2 ♦3 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
110 0.10 4.90 2♥ W ♦A 7-Johnson-Jean vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
|
| 12 |
♠-
♥T4
♦AT987643
♣AT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.90 0.10 4♦ N +2 ♠J 6-Harken-Winham vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
150 3.70 1.30 3♦ N +2 ♠J 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 ♦A 7-Johnson-Jean vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
300 1.30 3.70 5♣ S -3 ♠A 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
500 0.10 4.90 3N* S -2 ♠A 9-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 13 |
♠J6
♥2
♦Q864
♣JT9765
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT1/2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 5/4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥3 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
600 3.00 2.00 3N W ♥2 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
600 3.00 2.00 3N W ♣J 14-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
600 3.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 2-Barr-Barr
630 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♥2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
630 0.50 4.50 3N E +1 ♥3 7-Johnson-Jean vs 9-Harken-Tainty
|
| 14 |
♠975
♥T9
♦A542
♣A954
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♣6 14-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♦Q 7-Johnson-Jean vs 9-Harken-Tainty
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♦Q 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦Q 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 2-Barr-Barr
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♦7 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 15 |
♠K
♥AKT74
♦KT987
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 3/2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♠K 7-Johnson-Jean vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦Q 14-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
200 2.00 3.00 3♠ E +2 ♣Q 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 6-Harken-Winham
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦5 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Barr-Barr
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♣3 9-Harken-Tainty vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 16 |
♠KQ4
♥AK94
♦43
♣J874
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♥4 14-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
200 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦5 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Barr-Barr
100 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠8 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
100 2.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♦5 9-Harken-Tainty vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
90 1.00 4.00 2♦ E ♠2 7-Johnson-Jean vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
600 0.00 5.00 3N E ♠2 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 17 |
♠AT973
♥K75
♦9
♣A754
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♦5 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 7-Johnson-Jean
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♣K 9-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
140 3.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦5 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♣K 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
50 1.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♥A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
50 0.00 5.00 2♥ S -1 ♣Q 14-Gassman-Loops vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 18 |
♠AQ6
♥A83
♦T752
♣J63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 2/4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N S ♣8 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
150 3.50 1.50 2N N +1 ♠5 9-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Swanson-Buhr
150 3.50 1.50 2♦ S +3 ♣4 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
130 1.50 3.50 4♦ S ♣4 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
130 1.50 3.50 2♦ S +2 ♠2 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 7-Johnson-Jean
110 0.00 5.00 2♦ S +1 ♠2 14-Gassman-Loops vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 19 |
♠QJ953
♥AKT
♦K86
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♦ W -3 ♣3 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
50 4.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♦T 14-Gassman-Loops vs 7-Johnson-Jean
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♦2 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 2-Barr-Barr
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣5 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ W ♣5 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
200 0.00 5.00 2N N -4 ♥8 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 20 |
♠94
♥Q2
♦AT94
♣QJT65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.50 0.50 3N S ♣8 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 12-Formoso-Ruggeri
600 4.50 0.50 3N N ♥3 14-Gassman-Loops vs 7-Johnson-Jean
210 3.00 2.00 2N N +3 ♠7 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 2-Barr-Barr
180 1.50 3.50 2N N +2 ♦2 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
180 1.50 3.50 1N N +3 ♥3 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -1 ♣8 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Harken-Winham
|
| 21 |
♠KQT2
♥982
♦AT6
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +1 ♥A 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Harken-Winham
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +1 ♥A 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +1 ♥A 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Johnson-Jean
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +1 ♥A 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
170 2.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♥A 14-Gassman-Loops vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 22 |
♠AT86
♥987
♦A7
♣T873
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.30 0.70 1♠ E ♦J 10-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Johnson-Jean
80 4.30 0.70 1♠ E ♦J 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 13-Emanuel-Frank
90 1.90 3.10 1N W ♥9 4-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
90 1.90 3.10 1N W ♣3 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Harken-Winham
110 0.10 4.90 2♥ W ♦A 14-Gassman-Loops vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 23 |
♠AT64
♥87432
♦AQT
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.30 0.70 5♣ E -1 ♥J 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Harken-Winham
100 4.30 0.70 3♣ E -1 ♦3 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
130 2.50 2.50 4♣ E ♥J 14-Gassman-Loops vs 9-Harken-Tainty
170 1.30 3.70 3♣ E +3 ♠K 2-Barr-Barr vs 7-Johnson-Jean
600 0.10 4.90 5♣ E ♠K 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 24 |
♠AT853
♥KQ873
♦3
♣86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1/2NT ♥4/5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 4♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Harken-Winham
100 3.70 1.30 5♠ N -2 ♦A 14-Gassman-Loops vs 9-Harken-Tainty
130 1.30 3.70 4♦ W ♥K 13-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
130 1.30 3.70 4♦ W ♣8 2-Barr-Barr vs 7-Johnson-Jean
130 1.30 3.70 3♦ W +1 ♥K 11-Swanson-Buhr vs 8-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 25 |
♠K92
♥93
♦654
♣Q9754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 2♠ 2/1NT ♦7/6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 2.50 4♣ S ♦A 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
50 3.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦A 14-Gassman-Loops vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
100 2.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♦A 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 9-Harken-Tainty
|
| 26 |
♠AQ9
♥K
♦J7653
♣T984
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠J 12-Formoso-Ruggeri vs 9-Harken-Tainty
620 3.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦9 14-Gassman-Loops vs 10-Stone-Nathanson
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦9 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|