| 1 |
♠Q2
♥762
♦J643
♣K983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 4♥ W -1 ♥2 9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
120 2.00 2.00 2N W ♣8 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
140 0.33 3.67 3♥ W ♠Q 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 2 |
♠J82
♥K5
♦A973
♣KT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 2♥ W +3 ♣3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.33 3.67 4♠ W +1 ♠2 9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 3 |
♠9
♥JT64
♦76543
♣AT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 1.17 2♠ E ♦J 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
110 2.83 1.17 2♠ E ♣4 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.33 3.67 5♦* S -2 ♠2 9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 4 |
♠K4
♥Q73
♦A964
♣K973
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥5 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 5 |
♠K97
♥Q874
♦J65
♣K42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.67 0.33 1N E +3 ♦3 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
420 1.17 2.83 4♥ E ♦7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
420 1.17 2.83 4♥ E ♦5 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
| 6 |
♠AJ6
♥A2
♦AQ762
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3/4 ♦3 ♠5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3♥* W -1 ♦A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
150 2.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♥J 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 0.33 3.67 3N N -2 ♥4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 7 |
♠Q875
♥7
♦AKQ76
♣Q64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6/5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣2 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣2 9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣2 10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 8 |
♠K542
♥J54
♦J42
♣987
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 1.17 4♠ W ♣9 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
420 2.83 1.17 4♠ E ♥T 9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.33 3.67 3N W +1 ♣9 10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 9 |
♠92
♥KQ72
♦AQ42
♣J87
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♣ S +1 ♠3 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♠3 10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
150 0.33 3.67 3N S -3 ♠Q 9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠A83
♥K65
♦T5
♣AKJT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/5♣ 3♦ 3/4♠ 2/3NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.25 0.75 3N N ♥7 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
600 3.25 0.75 3N N ♣4 9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.38 2.63 3N N -1 ♥7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
200 0.13 3.88 5♣ N -2 ♥A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
| 11 |
♠86
♥AQ74
♦Q976
♣T76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♣A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
140 2.63 1.38 3♠ E ♥6 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.38 2.63 1N E +2 ♣3 9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♥9 10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 12 |
♠AJT7643
♥83
♦-
♣AJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +2 ♦A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
650 2.63 1.38 4♠ N +1 ♣9 9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ N ♦A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ S ♣4 10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 13 |
♠J95
♥32
♦KQJ32
♣AT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 4.00 0.00 4♣* S ♥T 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣K 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦5 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♣K 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦5 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 14 |
♠A32
♥T9743
♦T653
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -3 ♣7 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.50 2.50 4♥ W -3 ♣7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♥K 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♦7 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♦7 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 15 |
♠AK95
♥KT2
♦J75
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ S ♠J 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥J 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥9 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♣A 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♥J 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
|
| 16 |
♠AQ954
♥T3
♦KT983
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣T 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣K 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S ♣A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +3 ♣A 9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 17 |
♠873
♥QT9876
♦J876
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 5NT ♥7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ W +1 ♥T 9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ E +2 ♥A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
150 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -3 ♣Q 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ E +1 ♥A 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
150 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +3 ♦4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 18 |
♠A9872
♥J63
♦J96
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ 2/1NT ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N ♥9 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥9 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦4 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥9 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 19 |
♠T642
♥AKJ73
♦A3
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠7/6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦9 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 ♥A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♦6 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -2 ♠A 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 20 |
♠QJT8
♥-
♦T9852
♣AQ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥8 10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♦T 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♦5 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
200 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 ♣4 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 21 |
♠T952
♥T94
♦75
♣QT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ W ♥4 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♥T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
400 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥K 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
400 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥K 10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
400 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥J 3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
|
| 22 |
♠J84
♥KQ763
♦KT
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♥ -/1♠ ♦5 ♠6/7 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ N ♠7 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
100 2.63 1.38 1N E -1 ♦4 10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.38 2.63 2♥ N -1 ♠7 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
150 0.13 3.88 2♥ N -3 ♠7 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
|
| 23 |
♠KT97
♥AK852
♦T4
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ N ♠4 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ N ♣K 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
170 1.38 2.63 3♥ N +1 ♣K 10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ N ♣K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
|
| 24 |
♠QT76
♥T4
♦7654
♣T84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.63 1.38 5♥ E +1 ♠6 10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
480 2.63 1.38 4♥ W +2 ♠Q 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
480 2.63 1.38 4♥ W +2 ♦5 2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
510 0.13 3.88 5♥ W +2 ♦7 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
|
| 25 |
♠8
♥4
♦AKJT862
♣K643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 3♦ N +2 ♠A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
130 1.17 2.83 3♦ N +1 ♠A 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
130 1.17 2.83 2♦ N +2 ♠A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
| 26 |
♠QJ97
♥84
♦J983
♣Q82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 3♥ W +1 ♠Q 10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠Q 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
680 0.33 3.67 4♥ W +2 ♥4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
| 27 |
♠4
♥KJT64
♦J42
♣J973
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3/2♥ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠4/2 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♠ W ♣3 10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
690 0.33 3.67 4♠* W +1 ♠2 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|