| 1 |
♠62
♥J7
♦J84
♣AQJ963
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ N -3 ♥A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥T 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣4 3-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 2 |
♠972
♥T63
♦AJ7
♣K842
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♠K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♠K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S ♠K 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♠K 3-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♠K 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 3 |
♠JT8
♥Q96
♦AQJ
♣A976
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠3 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♥Q 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
80 1.00 3.00 1♥ S ♦3 3-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
50 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 ♠3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 4 |
♠4
♥AJ32
♦T643
♣AKQ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +2 ♠J 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +2 ♠5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +2 ♠5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♥5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♣T 3-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 5 |
♠AJ6
♥53
♦8532
♣AK87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +2 ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +2 ♣A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +2 ♣A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣A 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣A 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 6 |
♠96
♥Q765
♦QT93
♣K62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣4/6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♠ W +4 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦Q 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♠6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥9 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♥7 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
|
| 7 |
♠985
♥Q2
♦A84
♣KJT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠2 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
600 2.50 1.50 3N S ♠2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♠7 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +4 ♦6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -1 ♠2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
| 8 |
♠97
♥KQ63
♦KT87
♣JT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 ♣5 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ W ♠7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ W ♥K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E ♦9 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠QJ763
♥T7
♦KT9
♣A96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦A 3-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 1.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
100 1.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠A 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♦Q 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 10 |
♠AKT983
♥964
♦Q9
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥7 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥7 3-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ W -1 ♠A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 11 |
♠KT842
♥653
♦QJ
♣K73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Johnson-Jean
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♠A 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♦4 3-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♣3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
|
| 12 |
♠JT43
♥QJT43
♦J9
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 ♥A 3-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♦A 6-Harken-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.00 2.00 5♣ W -3 ♠J 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
| 13 |
♠A9765
♥AT96
♦8
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2/1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♥6 3-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥8 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ N +1 ♥3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♦8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♥3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
| 14 |
♠7
♥AJ87654
♦A64
♣98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♥4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠2 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 2.00 2.00 5♥* N -1 ♦K 3-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ E ♠J 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
300 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -2 ♦5 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
| 15 |
♠J63
♥7
♦AT76
♣AQT87
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 7♦ 3♠ 7NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.00 1.00 3N S +4 ♥5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
720 3.00 1.00 3N S +4 ♥4 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
720 3.00 1.00 3N S +4 ♥2 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Johnson-Jean
690 1.00 3.00 5N S +1 ♥6 3-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ S ♠9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 16 |
♠A52
♥K863
♦A84
♣J73
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♦7 3-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥4 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠J 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -2 ♥T 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 ♥4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 17 |
♠J872
♥AKJ53
♦AJT
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3/2 ♥4 NT3/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥Q 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♣7 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 3-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E ♥9 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♥Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 18 |
♠QT
♥AT4
♦AQ63
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N N ♦5 3-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♦5 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♦5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♦J 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♦5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 19 |
♠65
♥J95
♦AT9
♣87432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2♦ 3/2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠A 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
200 3.00 1.00 4♠* E -1 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠7 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♥A 3-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
| 20 |
♠KJ73
♥98
♦T652
♣K96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♣ E +4 ♦8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
600 2.50 1.50 3N W ♠3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
600 2.50 1.50 3N W ♠3 3-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
630 0.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♠3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
630 0.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♠3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
|
| 21 |
♠9743
♥KT74
♦J97
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: -/1♣ 2♦ 4♠ ♣6/7 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦K 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♣Q 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥4 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦K 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣7 3-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
|
| 22 |
♠3
♥A75432
♦JT98
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +3 ♣5 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ E ♣5 3-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +2 ♥8 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +2 ♥6 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 23 |
♠AKQ5
♥T9876
♦76
♣32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 6♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 4♣ W +2 ♠A 3-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
170 3.50 0.50 3♣ W +3 ♠A 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♠A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
620 1.00 3.00 5♣ W +1 ♦7 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠A 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
| 24 |
♠QT8752
♥QJ65
♦64
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
| EW: 3/2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Emanuel-Frank
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♦3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ E -2 ♦T 6-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ E -1 ♠A 3-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Formoso-Ruggeri
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ E ♣Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|