| 1 |
♠76
♥QJT86
♦J7532
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5/4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥Q 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♣Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 2.00 2.00 2♣ S -2 ♥A 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♥Q 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Katz-Dotters
|
| 2 |
♠KQ92
♥QJ4
♦J8
♣9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 3/2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N E ♠T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 2.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♥6 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
100 2.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♥6 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ E +1 ♠K 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Katz-Dotters
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 ♠5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 3 |
♠Q5
♥AQT9
♦654
♣T942
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N W +1 ♥9 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Katz-Dotters
150 1.50 2.50 2N E +1 ♦3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
150 1.50 2.50 1N E +2 ♠K 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Walker
150 1.50 2.50 1N E +2 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 1.50 2.50 1N E +2 ♥6 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 4 |
♠K87
♥JT7652
♦Q5
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N E ♦4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♦5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
150 2.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♦4 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Katz-Dotters
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♠7 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Winham-Murdock
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 ♠2 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 5 |
♠AK963
♥A83
♦-
♣AK863
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥2 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Murdock
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Katz-Dotters
630 1.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♥6 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
630 1.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♦6 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
300 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -3 ♦2 2-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 6 |
♠A8
♥AQ42
♦T52
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♣ N -2 ♦A 2-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
120 2.50 1.50 2N E ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Katz-Dotters
120 2.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♠3 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♠7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Murdock
180 0.00 4.00 2N E +2 ♣4 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 7 |
♠K53
♥Q98
♦74
♣KT983
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W ♦7 2-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W ♦7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Murdock
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♦7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Katz-Dotters
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦7 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦7 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 8 |
♠AJ5
♥QJ94
♦9654
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠2 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥K 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥T 2-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Katz-Dotters
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♣K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Winham-Murdock
800 0.00 4.00 5♥* S -4 ♣8 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 9 |
♠7
♥A53
♦J76
♣AQ8543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ E ♣T 2-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣2 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 3-Loops-Walker
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♠4 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Katz-Dotters
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 10 |
♠532
♥984
♦543
♣9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 1/-NT ♥7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♦6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♥K 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 3-Loops-Walker
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥8 2-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
400 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -4 ♦6 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Katz-Dotters
|
| 11 |
♠Q973
♥QJ642
♦6
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣8 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♣5 2-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♣8 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Katz-Dotters
300 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 ♣8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 12 |
♠865
♥3
♦5
♣KJ876542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT2 |
| EW: 3♦ 4/3♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦5 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Katz-Dotters
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦5 2-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
450 0.50 3.50 5♥ W ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♦5 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 13 |
♠AT6
♥9652
♦AJ52
♣75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: -/1♣ 2♠ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥A 2-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Katz-Dotters
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥A 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥A 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♥A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 14 |
♠J42
♥J973
♦-
♣K86532
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -2 ♦Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♥4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♣5 2-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Katz-Dotters
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♣5 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♣5 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 15 |
♠76
♥AJ86
♦53
♣AJT63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1/-♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠7/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♠7 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ E ♠7 2-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Katz-Dotters
100 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -1 ♥K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 16 |
♠QJ7
♥6542
♦6
♣JT965
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3/2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♦8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 ♠2 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ S +2 ♥4 2-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Katz-Dotters
120 0.00 4.00 1N S +1 ♣3 4-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Murdock
|
| 17 |
♠KJ54
♥6
♦K6542
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ -/1♠ ♥4 ♠6/7 NT5 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♦ N +2 ♥K 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 3.00 1.00 1♣ E +1 ♠9 2-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Murdock
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♦2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +1 ♦4 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♣6 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 18 |
♠A2
♥AKJ
♦AQ4
♣A9854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♣8 2-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Murdock
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♣2 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
600 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠3 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
150 1.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ N +1 ♦J 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
|
| 19 |
♠K85
♥75
♦J9843
♣752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♥7 2-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Murdock
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♦4 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♦4 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♦9 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♦4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
|
| 20 |
♠AKJ5
♥K
♦T962
♣Q953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦A 2-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Murdock
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦J 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 ♦J 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♣6 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Formoso-Nathanson
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S +1 ♦J 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 21 |
♠AK
♥T94
♦J874
♣T963
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♥ 4NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ W +2 ♦J 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Winham-Murdock
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ E +3 ♦K 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Katz-Dotters
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♠Q 2-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
| 22 |
♠J983
♥63
♦KQ942
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥6 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥K 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Winham-Murdock
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ E ♥K 2-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ E +1 ♣5 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Katz-Dotters
|
| 23 |
♠A97
♥T93
♦KQ75
♣K76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣A 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣A 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Winham-Murdock
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠9 2-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 1.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♥7 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 ♦6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Katz-Dotters
|
| 24 |
♠Q62
♥QT8
♦JT62
♣AT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥J 4-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Gelfand
430 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠7 5-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Winham-Murdock
210 2.00 2.00 2N N +3 ♠5 2-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -2 ♦2 3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Katz-Dotters
|