| 1 |
♠K942
♥AKT7
♦AQJT2
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3♥ W -1 ♠2 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
50 2.63 1.38 3♠ S -1 ♦5 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -2 ♦6 10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -2 ♣Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 2 |
♠Q842
♥8653
♦63
♣964
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
| EW: 2♣ 6♦ 6/5♥ 4/3♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 3N E +2 ♣5 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
490 1.38 2.63 3N E +3 ♣7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
490 1.38 2.63 3N E +3 ♣7 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
490 1.38 2.63 3N E +3 ♣7 10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 3 |
♠Q74
♥AQ5
♦974
♣AJ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 1N W -1 ♣6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -1 ♣5 10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ E ♥3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ E +1 ♥3 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 4 |
♠KJ87
♥Q42
♦J63
♣Q42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♠6 NT6/7 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.88 0.13 1N S +1 ♣5 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
100 2.63 1.38 1N W -1 ♠7 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
100 1.38 2.63 1♠ N -1 ♦2 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.13 3.88 2♦ S -2 ♣9 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 5 |
♠QT3
♥J65
♦J974
♣Q87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦6/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 1♥ S +1 ♣4 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥T 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥9 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -2 ♣5 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 6 |
♠AK86
♥632
♦AJ
♣AK73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6/5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♦ S ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 2N N -2 ♥7 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
|
| 7 |
♠Q7642
♥K63
♦K93
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ S -1 ♠8 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ S -1 ♥A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ S -1 ♣9 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♠A 10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 8 |
♠Q85
♥AKQ653
♦J3
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +2 ♠J 10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ S +1 ♠J 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ N +1 ♠J 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ N +1 ♣T 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 9 |
♠J842
♥AT5
♦AKJ985
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 3♦ N +1 ♣K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♦5 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ N ♦4 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
200 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -4 ♥2 10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 10 |
♠J9843
♥5
♦K983
♣754
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥5/6 ♠5/6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.25 0.75 3♦ E -2 ♥A 1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.25 0.75 4♣ E -2 ♥A 10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ E +1 ♦4 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
300 0.13 3.88 2♥ S -3 ♦2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
|
| 11 |
♠AK6
♥Q7
♦A8753
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.63 1.38 3N S +2 ♥2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
460 2.63 1.38 3N N +2 ♥6 10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
460 2.63 1.38 3N N +2 ♥3 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
430 0.13 3.88 3N N +1 ♥4 1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 12 |
♠9
♥AT532
♦JT95
♣A73
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 3.88 0.13 4♥* N ♦A 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -2 ♥A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ W -1 ♦J 1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ E ♥7 10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 13 |
♠A6
♥KT8
♦AK3
♣76432
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠8 4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠2 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠2 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♠K 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠8 10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 14 |
♠T742
♥KT86532
♦8
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 6♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ N -2 ♣2 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
200 3.00 1.00 5♥ N -4 ♦Q 10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.50 2.50 5♦ E +1 ♦6 4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.50 2.50 5♦ E +1 ♣6 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
650 0.00 4.00 5♦* E +1 ♥A 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 15 |
♠A42
♥K652
♦KQ98
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♦6 10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♦A 4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S ♥4 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
90 0.50 3.50 1N N ♣5 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
90 0.50 3.50 2♦ N ♥J 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 16 |
♠AJ765
♥9632
♦A85
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -4 ♣9 5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 2.50 1.50 1N E -2 ♣6 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
200 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +3 ♦6 10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
170 1.00 3.00 1♠ N +3 ♥K 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠AQT53
♥AJT52
♦J
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♣2 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣T 10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
50 2.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣A 5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♣5 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 18 |
♠942
♥AQT
♦AT96
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♣5 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♠J 5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -2 ♦Q 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♥A 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.00 4.00 1N W ♦6 10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
|
| 19 |
♠A3
♥Q9
♦J6532
♣Q542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2/1♠ 3NT ♥4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠2 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♠5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠3 4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
50 1.50 2.50 4♦ N -1 ♠7 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♥4 10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 20 |
♠Q9542
♥AJ972
♦J7
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥A 10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣5 4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
100 1.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♠4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 ♣5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 ♥4 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 21 |
♠A9762
♥A
♦KQT4
♣JT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -2 ♠A 4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
100 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -2 ♦K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 1.38 2.63 3♥ W -1 ♣J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ W ♣J 10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 22 |
♠AT7
♥K87
♦QJ973
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♦T 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♥7 10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♦Q 4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠Q 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W ♣K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
|
| 23 |
♠Q53
♥72
♦7542
♣AT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
100 2.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♦K 4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♦A 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♥K 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥7 10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 24 |
♠6
♥AT8632
♦83
♣Q987
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 4♠* W -2 ♥A 2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
300 3.50 0.50 4♠* E -2 ♥A 10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 3N E -1 ♠5 4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥9 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 25 |
♠AJT742
♥A2
♦763
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.63 1.38 3♠ N -1 ♣5 10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
50 2.63 1.38 2♠ N -1 ♠5 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
50 2.63 1.38 2♠ N -1 ♥3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -2 ♥5 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
|
| 26 |
♠J9
♥AK976432
♦54
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +2 ♠A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
620 2.63 1.38 4♥ N ♣T 10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 0.75 3.25 3♥ N ♦8 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
140 0.75 3.25 3♥ N ♣T 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
|
| 27 |
♠984
♥A4
♦K97
♣A8743
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N N ♠3 8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
150 2.63 1.38 2N S +1 ♥Q 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
50 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♥Q 5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
50 0.75 3.25 3N N -1 ♠3 10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|